Jump to content

Just venting, got a dud Ollie Baker Mainspring winder


Recommended Posts

I'm just venting a bit, after nearly a year of thinking about buying one I finally ordered an Ollie Baker Clock Mainspring winder from the USA to be shipped to me in Australia.

I received it a few weeks ago, but due to me spraining my wrist I only went to use it for the first time this week.

After mounting it to a board and going to use it I discovered it has several manufacturing defects.

1) The 'tailstock' is several millimeters higher than the headstock, so it holds the mainsprings at an angles.

2)The headstock has been machined off center ever so slightly so it wobbles up and down when turned, this wouldn't be a huge issue if the tailstock wasn't already several mms higher.

3) The pin that holds the click up to stop the winder from turning backwards has not been finished off properly leaving a sharp edge on it which catches and stops you from flicking it over to change the direction when it is under load, although this is only a minor problem that I can easily fix

4) I would not even complain about this if I didn't have the other problems, but the winding handle is just screwed to the arm by an allen screw, which of course unwinds itself when you turn the handle, again this is something I can easily fix, but shouldn't have to.

 

I've contacted the seller who has been around for a while and hopefully they will help resolve the problem, but just annoyed I've waited all this time and got a dud.

I can resolve issue 3 and 4 if the seller can resolve atleast issue 1. Of course the big question is it the headstock, or the tailstock that was manufactuered to the incorrect height...

If they don't want to come to the party I purchased via paypal so will take it to them and they will resolve it, but would rather go first directly to the seller and hope we can resolve it between ourselves

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tmuir said:

I'm just venting a bit, after nearly a year of thinking about buying one I finally ordered an Ollie Baker Clock Mainspring winder from the USA to be shipped to me in Australia.

I received it a few weeks ago, but due to me spraining my wrist I only went to use it for the first time this week.

After mounting it to a board and going to use it I discovered it has several manufacturing defects.

1) The 'tailstock' is several millimeters higher than the headstock, so it holds the mainsprings at an angles.

2)The headstock has been machined off center ever so slightly so it wobbles up and down when turned, this wouldn't be a huge issue if the tailstock wasn't already several mms higher.

3) The pin that holds the click up to stop the winder from turning backwards has not been finished off properly leaving a sharp edge on it which catches and stops you from flicking it over to change the direction when it is under load, although this is only a minor problem that I can easily fix

4) I would not even complain about this if I didn't have the other problems, but the winding handle is just screwed to the arm by an allen screw, which of course unwinds itself when you turn the handle, again this is something I can easily fix, but shouldn't have to.

 

I've contacted the seller who has been around for a while and hopefully they will help resolve the problem, but just annoyed I've waited all this time and got a dud.

I can resolve issue 3 and 4 if the seller can resolve atleast issue 1. Of course the big question is it the headstock, or the tailstock that was manufactuered to the incorrect height...

If they don't want to come to the party I purchased via paypal so will take it to them and they will resolve it, but would rather go first directly to the seller and hope we can resolve it between ourselves

I have had a Ollie for several years and have no problems what so ever. Are you sure it is a genuine Ollie. The Ollie baker is well made and solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its an Ollie Baker 'style' mainspring winder, it does have the companies name engraved onto it that made it, but wont post it yet as I may of just got a 'Friday Afternoon' apprentice piece and as long as its sorted I will be happy with that.

The parts are solid enough, its just someone miss measured on one part and were a bit slack on the finish of another part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to keep everyone updated I have been in touch with where I purchased the widner from and provided photos and measurements and they have been in touch with the manufacturer and they are going to machine me up replacement head and tailstocks for the winder, so hopefully in a couple of weeks it will all be resolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just to follow up I received replacement parts during this week and just reassembled my mainspring winder today and it all looks good, so problem is now solved.

Yes this was made by the main supplier of these in the USA, I know of 4 other people with the same brand of mainspring winder and theirs had no issues, I must of just got unlucky, but the manufacturer just going by my photos agreed their was an issue and made me the new parts and sent them to me at their expense so I am happy.

Now I can finally reassemble the clock barrels I am working on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...