Jump to content

Can Venus 175 & 178 parts be interchanged


Recommended Posts

According to Cousins parts database there are 2 alternative chrono runners for the 178. One with a height of 7.8mm from the Venus 150 (and 175) and one with a height of 9.2mm from the Venus 152.

However the Venus 178 parts list https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/993_Venus 178.pdf says its the same part as the 175. If you have the old one you can measure it to check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

According to Cousins parts database there are 2 alternative chrono runners for the 178. One with a height of 7.8mm from the Venus 150 (and 175) and one with a height of 9.2mm from the Venus 152.

However the Venus 178 parts list https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/993_Venus 178.pdf says its the same part as the 175. If you have the old one you can measure it to check.

Thanks yes I do have the old one so I will check

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On many Swiss movements the chronograph runner is part 8000- that's kind of standard nomenclature.

The thing to consider is the length of the shaft for the runner on a 178 vs a 175.  Manual wind chronographs with an hour recorder often have runners with a longer shaft- the reason for this is that the dial has to sit 1mm or so off the plate in order to accommodate the gearing for the hour recorder; so it wouldn't surprise me if the shaft is longer on a Venus 178 chronograph runner as opposed to the Venus 175 runner.  The same goes for the minute recording runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/01/2018 at 9:16 PM, RyMoeller said:

On many Swiss movements the chronograph runner is part 8000- that's kind of standard nomenclature.

The thing to consider is the length of the shaft for the runner on a 178 vs a 175.  Manual wind chronographs with an hour recorder often have runners with a longer shaft- the reason for this is that the dial has to sit 1mm or so off the plate in order to accommodate the gearing for the hour recorder; so it wouldn't surprise me if the shaft is longer on a Venus 178 chronograph runner as opposed to the Venus 175 runner.  The same goes for the minute recording runner.

Thanks I looked into it and there is a difference in the length.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
    • Thanks, OH! I agree with you. I'm currently looking at them under magnification, and they are consistent in shape and form for each section (flat pushers, pump pushers, concave, reamers, etc.). Though, a few are in bad condition and need to be replaced.  Before I cancel the return I have already initiated on eBay, can any of our members check to see if there are inconsistencies in markings on their sets? Also, I have included a snapshot of the bottom of one of the pump pushers, which are very unique in shape.  Can someone tell me if the bottoms of their pump pushers match this photo?  I'm hoping that Seitz had some inconsistencies in manufacturing over the years regarding markings.  Crossing my fingers. I appreciate you guys. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...