Jump to content

Create own watch from existing movement?


Recommended Posts

I've come across this online site that sell movements without the face or the dials or anything. It is the online shop for a physical shop that is close to me but I was wondering what is the reason behind selling these movements like this? Is it to build your own watch by choosing a face and the hands and all that or is it to practice with. Some clearer info would be appreciated

 

Untitled.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could do that but in most cases its to replace an existing movement in a watch because quite often that is the most economical thing to do with quartz movements especially total replacement of the movement is often the cheapest and quickest option than expending the time and effort to fix an existing movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of these movements are quartz. When repairing a quartz watch, a new movement is often the most cost effective fix. The same can be true of inexpensive mechanical watches. That’s why most new bare movements are bought.
You could as you suggest build your own watch, and some folks will rescue a dead mechanical watch with a quartz movement.
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?

Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaaah that makes more sense. The odds of finding the exact movement for the one you need might be a bit slim? I've also wondered about the watch balance wheel. Do they all differ depending on the movement they are being used in or are the more basic mechanical watches using a standard type of balance wheel?
Thanks for the info so far. I'm most likely going to asking questions as they come up.
Interesting and I see where you're coming from but interchangeable parts does not denote cheapness, in fact it's the opposite. The initial set up of such machinery would be beyond the financial capabilities of most watchmakers.
Seiko enjoy a high degree of interchangeable parts including balance assemblies which is why they may be so popular with the watch repairer

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Neileg said:

Balance wheels aren’t really standardised but a dozen quartz movements might cover 90% of the watches you come across.

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What diggingstony meant to say is simply that Seiko balances are interchangeable across 7S, 4R, 6R, 70x and may be even older movements. Indeed, a nice point for repairers and tinkerers.

Yes I understood the point. All I meant was that quartz movements are less varied than mechanical watches (on the whole).
Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 at 20° C) than 9504 (305 at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 at -25° to +125° C.
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...