Jump to content

Omega Info Required


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently purchased a 1962 Omega ladies watch which has a cal. 455 automatic movement. It's a Ladymatic in a square case. The information inside on the case back ties up with the movement serial number. The crystal, which has yellowed a bit and is cushion shaped and curved on all four sides, I'll need to replace. It's working fine but I will give it a service though.

The point of sale information described the watch as an Omega Redima Tick. Can someone please explain to me what that means because I cannot find out much about it?

The movement serial number is: 19008899, which dates it to 1962

I don't want to upload any photos because I don't want them on the WWW just yet,  but inside the case back is engraved:

  • ACIER INOXYDABLE
  • OMEGA WATCH CO. (inside a triangle)
  • FAB. SUISSE
  • SWISS MADE
  • 3993 62 SC

Thanks in advance.

 

Edited by systeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've worked it out. There's a recent version of the Omega Ladymatic model called Redima Tick.

The seller of the one I purchased used that model info for the Ladymatic I purchased.

What I need to do now is find a replacement crystal for it.

59c3ae51cc7b0_Picture187.jpg.9a6d382d6eaabbe433fa0c8aaa7773bd.jpg

59c3ae5a88582_Picture190.jpg.3570156c68746c14eeb0b79fa7929120.jpg

59c3ae4577967_Picture186.jpg.c958643e09089c89241e02b4b1e502cb.jpg

 

Does anyone know where I can get a replacement crystal for this. It's cushion one, inside and out, with a flange so it can be glued in from inside the case. The bezel aperture is 17.5mm x 17.5mm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Watcher said:

Cousins sell it: code number RX1731734 or RX1741744 or RX1751754

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/rectangular-shaped-sternkreuz-rx

Thanks.

I think. but I stand to be corrected, that the RX is for inset fitting into the front of the bezel. The type in this watch is an underlayed type, i.e. with a flange for fitting from inside and gluing into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes RX is front fitting, but with a little care with a file or a mill they can be reshaped to be rear fitting. I have done this a couple of times with curvex watches. Hence my suggested range of sizes. The corners have to be rounded also. Otherwise you need the correct Omega part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Watcher said:

Yes RX is front fitting, but with a little care with a file or a mill they can be reshaped to be rear fitting. I have done this a couple of times with curvex watches. Hence my suggested range of sizes. The corners have to be rounded also. Otherwise you need the correct Omega part.

Hmm, I still do not think it's possible. I'm not sure of the name of this type of crystal. Probably 'underlayed capsule' or 'cylinder' type, or something like that. Here's a freehand cross section of it:

IMG_20170922_0001.thumb.jpg.083a1ce5c1e380c547aeab827b8f108d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you give the correct numbers to your supplier, you will obtain the correct glass. Just clean the whole case, use a little crystal cement when fitting the glass it should just press in. The old glass are you sure it is an Omega glass, a genuine Omega glass has the insignia in the middle.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

If you give the correct numbers to your supplier, you will obtain the correct glass. Just clean the whole case, use a little crystal cement when fitting the glass it should just press in. The old glass are you sure it is an Omega glass, a genuine Omega glass has the insignia in the middle.   

 

Cousins cannot obtain it, it's to do with the ongoing Swatch problem, I gave then the model number which is 3993 62 SC.

As for the Omega insignia, the watch was made in 1962. Maybe they didn't do that then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, I still do not think it's possible. I'm not sure of the name of this type of crystal. Probably 'underlayed capsule' or 'cylinder' type, or something like that. Here's a freehand cross section of it:

 

This can be made from an RX crystal. I have done it. Milling or filing and then polishing - you only need shallow lip and the dimensioning is crucial. But it is a tricky job - better left to the professional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...