Jump to content

Movement ID?


Recommended Posts

 

Hi all,

 

Got my hands on another of these late 30's watches. Didn't run at first but soon found that the issue was due to a turn of the HS that had positioned itself over the HS stud and effectively prevented any operation. Possibly caused by the same guy who tried to top up the watch with oil via the winding stem inlet :-)

 

Once corrected, it ticks along nicely.

 

As I like to id the movements I fiddle with even if they are working, I have uploaded a couple of snaps for feedback.

 

The star-in-shield symbol indicates this should be a Venus75 but all photos I find (ranfft included) show a quite different bridge design even though the dial side seems to be identical with Venus 75.

 

Where variations of this kind common in these days?

 

Also curious if anyone knows about the letters ( A R. ??) on the bridge.

 

I suppose it's a brand id but since the dial and casing have no brand indication whatsoever, I'm happy for feedback.

 

e82c5a8ffaeaa3f7565b3949ef2fcc2a.jpg5be0cabf7be02766fbdb850e57eb9156.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi rogart63,

Maybe...? AR apparently comes from Aristide Racine, one of the founders.

I did some googling and there's for sure connections between Enicar and Venus. But they seem to be of more recent history.

Regardless it's interesting to see the large variation even within a caliber designation as Venus 75. I can't help wondering about the driving forces behind designing a special bridge to fit this base plate.

Was it just about having "your own" and being able to put your logo on the design?

Doesn't really makes sense in this case where the dial and case are completely anonymous and that's what the regular consumer will see...








Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
    • Knocked out another 404 last night...when you are in the zone! This watch was a non-runner which I picked up as part of a lot of 8 watches, so works out to be $3.12 per watch. Before:   And the finished watch, new crown and stem and the crystal was cracked so was replaced. I also replaced the mainspring as the original was the old steel type spiral and very 'set' - all else is original: The Movement was a AS 1686, but in reading around a little the ACCRO watch company were sued for their use of the five point crown on their Jacques Pere range as it resembled Rolex, see below: ACCRO then reverted to just ACCRO on their watches - I have done some sniffing around the internet and haven't seen another example of ACCRO and the crown together on a dial so maybe I have something unusual, or maybe I was looking in the wrong places 🙂.  
    • This watch was damaged when I got it. I didn't break the escape wheel pivot, and I bodged a fix with epoxy to see if I could get it running. I'm not yet ready to get into lathe work, or shellacking jewels, and may never be. But I'm learning plenty with each watch I tackle. 
×
×
  • Create New...