Jump to content

Mainspring help (again)


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, been awhile I know, another question, I need a new mainspring for a nice old cylinder fob watch im working on, 

My springs dimensions are as follows, 1.29mm height x 0.16mm thick x 300 mm length, barrel diameter is 11.31mm

On cousins the closest that my untrained brain can find is 1.25 x .115 x 340 now I know these measurements are abit off from my original ones but could someone please tell me what measurements are allowable to change so you can get a spring as close as possible if an exact replacement is not available? 

I can hazard a guess that I could drop a little on height as I have done so before after a kind member here pointed me in the correct direction for a new spring once before, but before I continue to ask the same quest over and over I need to learn this stuff once and for all so I don't have to keep annoying you all.

cheers guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting situation. I'm no expert by any means but it looks like you should give it a shot. The replacement spring may be a touch underpowering but it's also longer, so it may work to fit it in the barrel. I figure the power difference would be low enough that you could compensate by regulating the hairspring.

The alternative is a thicker hairspring which would over power a bit which is find unless the movement knocks.

Let us know how it turns out!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to remember a third of the barrel too be taken up by the barrel arbor a third by the spring and the other third left for space.

With many of these old pocket watches, you will never find the exact match. It is better to be a little weaker then to strong, providing it will run for 30 hours unless it is of 8 day duration.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably me that pointed you at this page last time... http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php

I wouldn't assume the watch has the correct spring fitted, but would work backwards from what you know... barrel diameter and arbour diameter, and use the calculator.

If you can't find a spring on Cousins, then try John at obsoletewatchandclockparts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thickness 0,16 is much too strong, 0,115 much too weak.

Hight and length are no critical sizes, but thickness should be right. My calculator says thickness  0,135 ... 0,14  length 350 ... 360.

I will post a little program for this and other calculations soon.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manyy thanks guys, sorry was away with work again and haven't been online for a couple of days let alone at the bench trying to solve the mainspring problem, will hopefully be on top of this in the next few days and have one on order and soon fitted back in the movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 🤣 i think your first statement is rather dramatic, but i will take it in good humour.  I think the thread speaks for itself John.  What we are aiming for and when i say we, thats not actually that many that have spoke up. Is to have a back up plan to keep members in touch in case the forum ever disappears. So in essence yes the group has maybe taken on a life of its own and would like to remain together forever ( 🤣 i can also be dramatic )  maybe more members need to give some input of how they feel about it or say they are just not that bothered.  Either way at least the question gets answered. Can i ask what the forum means to you and how you would feel without it ?
    • you should go to the European patent office and look up watch patents. I'm guessing it's probably impossible to make anything related to watches without stepping on somebody's patent it's good that they expire with time. They've literally as far as I can tell patented everything and anything. this is why is pointing out their other formulas for the Epilam I'm pretty sure Rolex might have their own formula for instance. somewhere in the universe I was once reading things that were rejected for patents for basically this kind of thing. So yes there is rules on what can and cannot be patented but I'm sure things fall through the cracks.  
    • Here is all the info on the 'Brocot' suspension block and regulating arbor. http://www.ian-partridge.co.uk/brocotsq.htm
    • I usually don't read new introductions but when you came to the group did you want to learn watch repair? The reason I ask is your watch seems so suffered some damage under your hands. And now you're ready to move on to a new patient and have you learned? I often relate watch repair like learning to be a doctor lots of practicing. Even though this is a damaged watch have you practice taking it apart and putting it together a whole bunch at times so you feel confident that the next watch you probably won't break anything? Then when watches were invented specifically pallet forks they didn't have epoxy glue which even if they did they wouldn't you used anyway because the pallet stones need to be moved around they need to be adjusted. so the substance of choice for holding pallet stones and roller jewel's in is shellac. It's a really interesting substance were if it's warmed up at melts the palace on can be moved around hopefully the correct position when it cools shellac hardens back up in the pallet stone will be held in place. If you're carefully could probably put your pallet stone back just warm up the fork carefully ideally there's a tool for this and your pallet stone would be fine.
    • Hi @JohnR725, I would say its a happy end, the watch was in a much worser state and turned out quite nice(imho). I just hoped for a higher result after all that work.  I agree with you, as long as it runs and keeps time, Im happy. Thank you for your advices!   
×
×
  • Create New...