Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

I have a brand new ETA 955.412 movement replacing another with stem damage. With the following steps:

  • Place minute/hour wheel.
  • Place front plate and secure.
  • Place hands (pressed on easily).
  • Inserted new battery.
  • Ensured crown is pushed fully home.

Trouble is, it doesn't function at all. My first thought is I messed it up somehow! Whilst I'm no watchmaker, my day job is engineer so I'd like to figure it out (if the movement was not bust from purchase).

What I've checked is:

  • Changing time with crown works perfectly.
  • Date changing functions perfectly.
  • New battery (voltage 1.58V) measured at chip.
  • Coil measures 1.5k ohm.
  • Current draw of around ~2uA.

I'd be grateful for any advice!

Thanks.

Posted

Do you have a quartz watch tester? This will tell you if the electronics is producing a pulse.
Failing a tester an oscilloscope will do that too.
Then is the rotor turning? If you demagnetise a quartz movement, everything works except the rotor is no longer turned by the coil.
The movement may look perfect, even still in ETA packaging, but it may have been demagnetised intentionally or accidentally.
Hope this helps
Cheers Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Check battery? This movement are pretty simple. You see when the wheels turn? New or NOS ? Could be an old but new movement that has been around for some years. 

Posted

All I know is that these 955s -just like most quartz movements- are quite unpredictable.

For one of these watches, I polished case, repaired bracelet ("watchmaker" said bring it to Tissot, LoL) and replaced battery for my sister in law. After few days it came back dead and had to replace move.t.

Posted

Mmm...
In my experience the 955 is one of the more reliable quartz movements. But it's been around for a while and age does a quartz no good.
The mechanics need servicing just like a clockwork watch and damp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Mmm...
In my experience the 955 is one of the more reliable quartz movements. But it's been around for a while and age does a quartz no good.
The mechanics need servicing just like a clockwork watch and damp does in the electrics.
A flat battery can be caused by a fault and a new battery may not fix the watch. With a meter you can check the current draw which should be 2 micro amps or less but microammeters are neither common nor cheap.
Most Japanese movements are usually cheap enough that a swap out is the cost effective fix. Swatch's pricing policy on quartz is similar to its mechanical watch policy so a service is a good first step.
I'm not beating the drum for quartz but you need to understand it's different.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
 

In my experience the 955 is one of the more reliable quartz movements. But it's been around for a while and age does a quartz no good.

Well, as it happens, almost every mov.t on heart is described as a"workhorse".. which gives you a good feeling until you meet a broken one :blink:

 

With a meter you can check the current draw which should be 2 micro amps or less but microammeters are neither common nor cheap.

Indeed. I saw a digital one which looked good and under 100 Euro, but didn't get it.

 


Most Japanese movements are usually cheap enough that a swap out is the cost effective fix. Swatch's pricing policy on quartz is similar to its mechanical watch policy so a service is a good first step.

I took the 955 apart and put it back up before giving up. Mark has made a great video about it. I found difficult to align pivots in the bridge.

Posted

I doubt you could de-magnetise the rotor as I believe it is normally made with what is called a 'permanent magnet'.  I tried to de-magnetise a rotor in my early days of messing with watches thinking it should be de-magnetised.  Despite many efforts I never managed to de-magnetise it (and it still worked afterwards!).  Maybe a very powerful de-magnetiser could do the job but would probably de-magnetise everything within a large range!!!!

  • Like 1
Posted

I can only refer to my point about testing for a pulse. A tester at about 30gbp may be too much to rescue one watch but I use mine every time have a quartz movement to fix.
Cheers Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Back to basics.
1. When you fitted the stem did you keep pressure on the crown whilst tightening the screw. If so it could jam the movement. But the hands will adjust when pulling the crown.
Re fit the stem and see if this works.
You say the hands fitted easily. That's good. But make sure the hour hand has not been pushed down too far. This can cause a jam. It should sit flush on its seating and be perfectly horizontal.
Also I had a Invicta Pro Diver. The quartz version . Awful watch. Fitted with a Seiko PC 21 movement
I demagnetised it on my elma push button. Also on my cheap chinese demagnetiser. I got the hands to spin round but could not get the damm thing to stop working. Still keeps perfect time !.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Posted
I doubt you could de-magnetise the rotor as I believe it is normally made with what is called a 'permanent magnet'.  I tried to de-magnetise a rotor in my early days of messing with watches thinking it should be de-magnetised.  Despite many efforts I never managed to de-magnetise it (and it still worked afterwards!).  Maybe a very powerful de-magnetiser could do the job but would probably de-magnetise everything within a large range!!!!

You may well be correct. I've never tried to demagnetise a rotor but I'm repeating some frequently read advice. I suppose it would take a lot of zap to neutralise a permanent magnet!
I know that you should never try and clean the rotor with the rest of the parts because it picks every bit of steel dust or swarf.
Cheers Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...