Jump to content

Watch back gasket sizing


Recommended Posts

Hi gang,

I have replaced the battery in my wife's ESQ quartz watch. It has a snap back which was very difficult (for me anyway) to open.

I replaced the battery and replaced the gasket with one that was as close to my measurements as possible, using a set of calipers. The gasket seems to fit pretty well, but when I attempt to snap the case back on the gasket spooges out and now looks kind of stretched. When y'all size your gaskets do you choose the exact inside diameter to match the back or do you choose one slightly smaller so that it stretches over the back? 

Also, is there any magic trick to getting a really tight snap on back snapped back on?

Thanks all

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally aim to have a little tension in the gasket holding itself to the inside of the case back, so in other words, i'd pick one 1 or 2 mm smaller, too much smaller and the gasket will stretch thin and be ineffective but 1 or 2 mm of stretching ought to make little enough difference.

I've often found case back gaskets that didn't look stretched after i opened the watch to do just as you described, so its not unheard of, they just got degraded or agitated enough from opening to give them a touch too much slack. 

Invest in good case back press, that's my only advise for tight case backs, the way  modern watches are made now means even basic fashion manufacturers are able to make incredibly tight fitting case backs and it's just no longer realistic to expect to be able to work on watches and close them just with your bare hands. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks y'all. I will try sizing them a tad smaller in the future. I will also try a bit of grease to see if that helps. Coming from a woodworking background, I do have some parallel jaw claps that I may try to use to press the back on. It has already come in handy for pressing in a bracelet pin that I stupidly pushed partially out the wrong direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

Since gaskets are pretty cheap I usually get the exact size and also a size or two smaller.  I've encounter the same problem though as a result of the gasket being too thick.

Depends, from experience, I originally purchased various sizes lots from China, BIG MISTAKE, they perish over time, become brittle, and frey.  So I binned the lot and purchased the more expensive option boxsets Swiss ISO type thick from cousinsuk.  Its not worth risking a watch water resistance with anything else to be honest.

I find the £52GBP box assortment very good quality.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/o-ring-box-sets

Edited by SSTEEL
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...