Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And I had to stop at this point. I should be installing the start/stop actuator and reset lever, but the first one is damaged, so I need to source it.

Furthermore, I still need to get the balance wheel for the other Poljot, the Sturmanskie, swap it with the one belonging to this movement, and a stem and crown assembly, which was missing. So a lot to do and some parts to buy.... 

Posted

The operating lever (part 8140) for the Poljot 3133 movement is very hard to find. So I decided to look for an alternative. Being the 3133 from the Russian manufacturer in fact a "clone" of the Valjoux 7734, with some changes, I would expect some if not almost all parts be interchangeable.

A nice thread over at watchuseek explains the similarities and differences between these two movements:

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f54/poljot-3133-vs-valjoux-7734-lysanderxii-224306.html

So I set my searches on eBay for an operating lever for a Valjoux 7734. I am quite shocked at the prices I found, honestly... they start at 30€  to end up to 103€!!1 That is CRAZY!!!

 

 

Posted

Ok I just bought the balance wheel, complete with hairspring, and am looking for the other parts at reasonable prices.

Meanwhile, I installed the second dial I got with this movement. Looks good doesn't it?

dial_white.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

While I was waiting for the balance wheel to be marked as "shipped", which was earlier today, I sourced out a stem+crown and the operating lever, part 8140. I also bought the lever spring, part 8335, which was not cheap by any means... I hope all arrives for the end of this week....

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/13/2017 at 9:47 AM, GeorgeClarkson said:

So I set my searches on eBay for an operating lever for a Valjoux 7734. I am quite shocked at the prices I found, honestly... they start at 30€  to end up to 103€!!1 That is CRAZY!!!

Yes, I've discovered if the part is called "Valjoux" it's going to cost a pretty penny! :huh:

Alternately, I needed a minute recording jumper for a Venus 170 and was able to find one from a Strela 3017 (formerly Venus 150) that looks like it will work with minor modification... for about a quarter of the cost.

  • Like 1
Posted

It is getting addictive... The same person who sold me the stem+crown had an almost complete movement + case he was disassembling to sell it as parts... Story is that he had this complete watch that stopped working for who knows whatever reason (the chronograph was no working) so he sent it to a watchmaker to asses the problem and solve it.

Well, after two (2!!!) years he got it back, in pieces, inside a tin box... So I asked him how much he wanted for the whole thing, and we bargained a price we were both comfortable with, considering the status of the poor watch. So I will be receiving another 3133 to service, or use for parts this time.

I know you want pics, I can only give you the seller's, who I hope will forgive me for posting them here....

The first pic is, of course, the crown + stem...

s-l500.jpg

Posted

But there was more to it than I was expecting, since he also sent these pics. Basically a complete watch completely disassembled (probably some parts will be missing, since I don't know what he sold before) needing a lot of TLC...

$_12 (1).jpg

$_12 (2).jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Some of the parts arrived today, and I was eager to continue with the reassembly of this movement/watch... but I encountered some issues.... mainly incompatibility issues, that is.

But first, some pics...

This is what I received today: The balance wheel, the operating and fly-back lever spring, part no.8335 and the operating lever, part no.8140

Both the spring and the operating lever, since it was almost impossible to find them original Poljot, had to be sourced from its counterpart movement, Valjoux 7734. Since the Poljot 3133 is basically a "clone" of the 7733 from the swiss manufacturer, being built with the same machinery and tools, I was hoping they were fully copatible one with each other. But I was wrong...

IMG_20170120_133009675.jpg

Posted

Or at least partially wrong: the spring (part no.8335) is perfectly compatible, and works like a charm. I did compare it with an original Poljot spring, and although it is slightly longer on one end, it fits perfectly in the crevice of the movement, and it is the same width.

A pic of the bag containing the two Valjoux/poljot parts:

IMG_20170120_133040116.jpg

Posted

The issue is basically that the operating lever from Valjoux is slightly longer that the Poljot one. This means that it fits inside the same space as the original, but it is very hard to actuate. Furthermore, I also noticed that the end on the side of the hole for the post on the movement plate, where the screw should go, is also slightly thicker, so when you screw it down it locks the lever. While this is easily resolvable, with a bit of sanding, the fact that the lever is longer than necessary makes it all more difficult than it needed to be.

Now I have 2 options:

  1. I file down the end with the hole and then I also file the movement chronograph plate creating a slightly larger "C" gap
  2. I wait for the other movement I got, a Poljot 3133 as well, that should have a perfectly working 8140 operating lever. In this case, I bought this Valjoux part for nothing.

Of course I will wait for the other Poljot movement to arrive and try out that lever, but in the meantime I also wanted to see this movement working... I am a bit impatient, honestly.

BTW, I also installed the balance to see if the movement works, and it does.

IMG_20170120_134530845.jpg

Posted

And today I received the third movement, which is almost complete except for the balance wheel and balance cock(or balance bridge if you will).

Here's a pic of what I received: the almost complete movement on the right, a not so bad case and its back cover below, and some goodies inside the plastic box...

IMG_20170121_172332391.jpg

Posted

The plastic box contains another white dial with English writings, hands, the pallet fork and its screws, the stem and crown and the glass for the case, that I fear though belongs to another type of case since its border is too high. Pictured below the two white dials: on the left the dial that came with the Admiral on the right the new one. They are almost identical, where it not for the English writing and different font for the Roman numerals.

IMG_20170121_172505793.jpg

Posted

A close up of the movement, which is not so dirty as I expected to be, shows that, considering the style and position of the markings on the chronograph bridge, it was probably made around 1991.

IMG_20170121_172514884.jpg

Posted (edited)

And.... the third movement has been cleaned... and will be, without the parts that I need to use for the Admiral Watch, put back together. At the moment I am checking all the parts, one by one, to asses their status. I already saw that a couple of parts do show some rust, unfortunately.

As per the Admiral: the operating lever of this third movement is in perfect condition, and I already put it in place, and the movement is finally complete. The watch  itself has also received the stem and crown of the third spare watch, yet the crown is chromed so I will have to check out if I find a proper, gold plated crown IF I want to keep the case and dial of the Admiral

This leads me to another dilemma (the first one being sorted): what should I do with this case? the pushers are a bit pitted in their gold plating, the crown, as I said, is missing, the glass is completely scratched, but still allows the dial to be easily read. The problem is actually the dial, without the 11 hour marker, and the broken chronograph second hand.

It will be extremely hard to find a good looking watch with broken movement to get the complete case from. It would be much easier to just buy a NOS case, chromed, off eBay, for some 60€. Then fit the white dial and source proper hands, which are easier to find.

I haven't also tested the movement of the Admiral for accuracy. But I noticed it runs a bit fast. This is though due to the unregulated balance wheel, probably.

So what are your thoughts?

poljot_3133_admiral_rebuild_1.jpg

poljot_3133_admiral_rebuilt_2_.jpg

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
  • Like 1
Posted

Hmmm - 

White dial, new hands, replace the crown with a suitable generic, new glass,  and clean the case and pushers as best you can. See how it looks, might be OK! If not, you can then spend the money on a NOS case, and you'll only be out a glass and crown, which aren't a lot of money and may be useful elsewhere.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Very impressive work George; hats off :bow: It also cleaned up very nicely! Surely, by judging the pictures, you must have a bucket full of this Baltic sea sand ....... I've heard it's a collectors item :) 

I get a good idea what's in store for me :huh:

BTW; I bought the early 1992 Poljot 3133 "Sport", marked on the dial with "Made in the USSR". After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, only briefly after my model, the dials were marked with "Made in Russia" ......... I just couldn't resist ........ sorry ...... ;)

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...