Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a front loading watch and every time I put the Crystal on it put to much pressure on the stem and is very hard to set the time.

What am I doing wrong? Do I need to replace the Crystal? I polished the Crystal before i set it in. Did I miss shape the Crystal?

b96321be617a5cac3d2b27c3e568c568.jpg

bf0e5f609bcc21fbde74fa5e79a87466.jpg

513800da260dd7017b0130e6ade437d7.jpg

87643230ec1f1db30db6858ba933ffc7.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Remember to use a gold ring if you do use a tension ring crystal. It may not be a tension ring type if the ring would end up obscuring the dial text when fitted, but it's hard to tell from your photos. 

Does the inner rim where the crystal fits have a ridge?

Posted
20 minutes ago, rodabod said:

Remember to use a gold ring if you do use a tension ring crystal. It may not be a tension ring type if the ring would end up obscuring the dial text when fitted, but it's hard to tell from your photos. 

Does the inner rim where the crystal fits have a ridge?

The problem here is it might not be the right glass.

Posted

looks like the wrong crystal,  who made the watch?   i have never seen a crystal with a " stem notch".   a "front loader" usually  requires a factory spec. crystal.

Posted
looks like the wrong crystal,  who made the watch?   i have never seen a crystal with a " stem notch".   a "front loader" usually  requires a factory spec. crystal.




It was made by Hamilton. It has a Hamilton 818 movement. It is a beach craft award for service watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I don't like that nasty mark round the side of the glass. I'm thinking it might need a tension ring glass.




This is the one it came with before I serviced the movement. I don't remember if it was hard to set before I removed the Crystal to start the service.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

It seems to me that any crystal , even a generic , should have a flat bottom that would seat on the rim above the stem tube . 

Being a front loader , the stem is a 2 piece model or , there is a notch on the dial that can be accessed after the crystal is removed so the setting lever can be pushed to remove the stem ,  or the dial feet are friction fit into the holes in the movement , and after removing the dial the setting lever can be accessed to remove the stem .  In any case the point I am aiming at is that maybe the  stem is not original and there is a raised portion on the stem that is interfering with the crystal .  

Posted
It seems to me that any crystal , even a generic , should have a flat bottom that would seat on the rim above the stem tube . 

Being a front loader , the stem is a 2 piece model or , there is a notch on the dial that can be accessed after the crystal is removed so the setting lever can be pushed to remove the stem ,  or the dial feet are friction fit into the holes in the movement , and after removing the dial the setting lever can be accessed to remove the stem .  In any case the point I am aiming at is that maybe the  stem is not original and there is a raised portion on the stem that is interfering with the crystal .  




Is it hard to align some movements and stems in front loaders? I have never had a problem in the past. But I don't get a lot of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

No , not really .  If it's a 2 piece stem the part with the crown will separate as it is intended to do , but the other half is still usually in the tube and because you pull to remove the crown half the part that is still on the watch is in the setting position and you have to use a tool to push it to the winding position so it's easier to remove the movement .  I have done Omega Cosmics ,Dynamics and other watches , and the movement nestles into the case . As a matter of fact I just remembered that on the Dynamic you put a pegwood in the dial hole for the date and rotate the movement counter clockwise 1/8 turn to unlock the movement from the case . Seiko has a front loader that after the crystal is removed , you use a screwdriver or tweezers on a ring around the dial to rotate the movement .

I guess the answer is to get info on the particular watch you are working on to know how to proceed .  In this forum a member was working on a Breitling Top Time and once he took off the crystal , he wasn't sure how to remove the movement or dial . The dial was a friction fit where the dial feet were pressed into holes in the movement that had plastic keepers . Once the dial was gently pried up and off it became obvious how to remove the stem and movement .  You can probably do a search for Breitling Top Time and get the actual procedure .

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...