Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First post on this forum - first stripdown of 7S26A. When checking the position of the oscillating weight prior to removal, could not align it as explained in the Tech Guide for Cal.NH25/26. It seems to be cut-away such that I cannot match the centre of the weight with the winding stem while lining the tip of the weight with the balance bridge pin and the hole in first reduction wheel gear.

Started to wonder if my Tech Guide refers to a 7S26B? The watch I wear has a 7S26B and the weight looks more like the one in the Tech Guide ie; not as cut-away. Have attached a pic of the weight removed from from the stripdown job. Is the setting position as described in my Tech Guide the same for all 7S26 calibres? 

Have also attached a pic of the dial holding spacer showing some glue (goo) which I presume was used to hold the date dial flat. Would this have been necessary?

Cheers

 

IMG_4415[1].JPG

IMG_4414[1].JPG

Posted
1 hour ago, Clicoon said:

Have also attached a pic of the dial holding spacer showing some glue (goo) which I presume was used to hold the date dial flat. Would this have been necessary?

May have been used to hold the main dial flat , I have see this "fix" with broken/loose dial legs. Date dial should move freely inside spacer, glue wouldn't help it move. Did main dial come off with a fight?

Posted

Sorry - obviously should have said main dial. Only 2 brass coloured pins on back of dial and plenty of spots of glue. All came away without any effort. 

Thanks.

Posted
8 hours ago, Clicoon said:

Sorry - obviously should have said main dial. Only 2 brass coloured pins on back of dial and plenty of spots of glue. All came away without any effort. 

Thanks.

Can't understand why would someone glue down dial unless there was issue with legs or dial screws, the two pins on back seems correct, hope you don't find any problems when you reassemble. Good luck.

Posted
1 hour ago, WileyDave said:

Can't understand why would someone glue down dial unless there was issue with legs or dial screws, the two pins on back seems correct, hope you don't find any problems when you reassemble. Good luck.

I see a lot of glue on Seikos from the Philippines. The OP can tell where this one comes from.

Posted

Thanks dadistic - the Tech Guide I'm using for Cals NH25/26 was mentioned as "typical" for 7S26 Cals. but size and alignment of oscillating weight is obviously different between A-B-C cals. Thanks to your link to the actual Seiko 7S26A Guide I will proceed with more confidence.

As to the dial, I thought there would be more than two brass pins for it to sit level but no sign of any missing. The two pins I see,  only protrude a small amount, in fact the spots of glue securing the dial markers protrude nearly as much as these two pins. Can therefore see why glue may have been necessary, but hope I can install without the need for it.

Once again thanks to those guiding me on my way.

 

Posted
Thanks dadistic - the Tech Guide I'm using for Cals NH25/26 was mentioned as "typical" for 7S26 Cals. but size and alignment of oscillating weight is obviously different between A-B-C cals. 

No, it is not. Only the writing changes.
Posted (edited)

The NH25/26 guide shows a differently shaped rotor. The rotors in the 7S26A and 7S26C Tech Guides are the same. I don't have a B, I don't know if one exists. 

Screenshot 2016-11-17 14.37.37.png

Edited by dadistic
Posted
The NH25/26 guide shows a differently shaped rotor. The rotors in the 7S26A and 7S26C Tech Guides are the same. I don't have a B, I don't know if one exists. 

The shape if the rotor doesn't matter. The rotor must be aligned with its center line at 3 as the red circle in the illustration shows. This the position in which the magic lever is most efficient when walking, using the pendolum movement of the arm.
Posted
15 hours ago, jdm said:

The shape if the rotor doesn't matter. The rotor must be aligned with its center line at 3 as the red circle in the illustration shows. This the position in which the magic lever is most efficient when walking, using the pendolum movement of the arm.

Correct. But the illustrated procedure is different, and can be confusing for someone who is not familiar with the movement. 

Posted
Correct. But the illustrated procedure is different, and can be confusing for someone who is not familiar with the movement. 


I think one should always try to fully understand what a tecnical manual tries to convey. Fortunately in this case it's easy as the illustration shows how the rotor must be dead on lined at 3H.
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks to all for the additional comment.

Now that I'm following the actual 7S26A tech guide the prior glitches are less likely. It will be some time before I get to reinstalling the rotor as I'm now at the early stage of reassembly and finding it a bit more difficult than the strip down. Much practice needed to reinsert small screws etc. Trying to assess the degree of wear on parts will also be problematic for me the novice. More study needed!

Cheers   

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't think it needs to be exact. The idea is to have the rotor hanging at its optimum position for winding.. which is crown down (ie when you're walking and swinging your arms) and having the winding pinion in the middle of its travel.

Now I haven't gone thru all the Seiko literature but I don't think that there is any different setting for watches which don't have the crown at 3 o'clock (quite a few have the crown at 3:40ish). We are talking a radial displacement of 1/15 or close to 30 degrees here so I say get it as near as possible and be happy.

Anil

 

Posted

Where was the watch purchased? Sounds like a possible Mumbay Seiko or from the Philippines...use of glue is very common there....:startle:

If you post an image from the back of the mvt, you can determine what mvt is used, the rotor can be replaced by one not fitting the mvt.

Posted
12 hours ago, Clicoon said:

Much practice needed to reinsert small screws etc. Trying to assess the degree of wear on parts will also be problematic for me the novice. More study needed!

When I did my first 7S26, I took the bridge on and off  ten times in a row as practice. Helped a lot.

Posted
Yes dadistic - that's exactly what I am doing at present. Need a steadying sip of something between each attempt !



You'll soon find that affects your ability to see [emoji23]
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...