Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Tinkering with a Omega 1022 from hell :) . Always something that doesn't seam to work or broken. I think the device for hand winding is called wig-wag. The lowest little screw i manage to break the head of?There is a little end that sitting on a small spring in the end of the screw? And it's only a 0,50 thread so very tiny. There is a small holder on the underside of the bridge. Where should i find such a screw? Does it have a Omega number? Shall assemble the movement and see if it's working okay. The rotor should be working so i could finish it. A few others have tried to renovate this watch and failed. So my self confidence would be low if i failed :( DSC07391.JPGDSC07395.JPGDSC07393.JPG

Edited by rogart63
Posted
28 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

Tinkering with a Omega 1022 from hell :) . Always something that doesn't seam to work or broken. I think the device for hand winding is called wig-wag. The lowest little screw i manage to break the head of?There is a little end that sitting on a small spring in the end of the screw? And it's only a 0,50 thread so very tiny. There is a small holder on the underside of the bridge. Where should i find such a screw? Does it have a Omega number? Shall assemble the movement and see if it's working okay. The rotor should be working so i could finish it. A few others have tried to renovate this watch and failed. So my self confidence would be low if i failed :( DSC07391.JPGDSC07395.JPGDSC07393.JPG

The 1020 and 1022 are tough to work on....they run great, but have quirks like the one you've just mentioned. I happen to have some Omega parts at home from a Seamaster 1020 I recently overhauled successfully. When I get home later today, I'll see if I have that screw.

 

J

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, noirrac1j said:

The 1020 and 1022 are tough to work on....they run great, but have quirks like the one you've just mentioned. I happen to have some Omega parts at home from a Seamaster 1020 I recently overhauled successfully. When I get home later today, I'll see if I have that screw.

 

J

That would be so great :) If you look to the left in the last photo! You see a small spring that is caput. That sits under the second pinion gear? That was also broken. Fortunately an good one came along with the used movement plate i bought. 

 

Edited by rogart63
Posted
10 hours ago, rogart63 said:

Tinkering with a Omega 1022 from hell :) . Always something that doesn't seam to work or broken. I think the device for hand winding is called wig-wag. The lowest little screw i manage to break the head of?There is a little end that sitting on a small spring in the end of the screw? And it's only a 0,50 thread so very tiny. There is a small holder on the underside of the bridge. Where should i find such a screw? Does it have a Omega number? Shall assemble the movement and see if it's working okay. The rotor should be working so i could finish it. A few others have tried to renovate this watch and failed. So my self confidence would be low if i failed :( DSC07391.JPGDSC07395.JPGDSC07393.JPG

This is the sort of project I love. It will be well with the effort when complete giving great satisfaction when it starts to give a heart beat again. My advise is take your time inspect every part when disassembling so no disappointments when re-assembled. Enjoy.

  • Like 2
Posted

The little thin second pinion was broken also? All but lots of trouble? But can't give up now? The hands look like **BLEEP** to? And the second hands has missing tube? If i get it to work i am going to go with the AM hands from Speedtimerkollektions. 

The movement is now almost assembled and has minute and hour hands put on to see if it's working okay? 

Posted

i have an old seamster with this movement - its an absolute nightmare! crown constantly pulls all the way out when trying to set it, even though all the parts are absolutely fine! I've changed the setting lever and spring still does it. Does anyone have a digram for this movement? I've checked cousins and they don't have a very good breakdown that shows the keyless works etc

Posted

This sounds like wear to the stem collar allowing the stem to wobble about & fall out when it's in certain positions.  A nightmare to fix.   I have overcome this problem in the past by making an oversize stem to take up the slack.  

  • Like 1
Posted
The little thin second pinion was broken also? All but lots of trouble? But can't give up now? The hands look like **BLEEP** to? And the second hands has missing tube? If i get it to work i am going to go with the AM hands from Speedtimerkollektions. 

The movement is now almost assembled and has minute and hour hands put on to see if it's working okay? 


Hello Rogart,

Are these the right screw for the wig-wag? I have everything disassembled, so not sure if these are part of winding mechanism. They are very small....about 0.50mm thread.

57f95ca0a7a2865a3f9acf1f4a429743.jpg

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, noirrac1j said:


Hello Rogart,

Are these the right screw for the wig-wag? I have everything disassembled, so not sure if these are part of winding mechanism. They are very small....about 0.50mm thread.

57f95ca0a7a2865a3f9acf1f4a429743.jpg

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
 

Looks like those are the top two screws? The lower one is a little longer an has a small tap at the end. If you look at the picture that is the screw without the head. 

DSC07393.thumb.JPG.8216292b276eb6ae6866f8c6ac4d08a7.JPG

Posted

You can zoom in if you click the picture. 

This watch is giving me so much trouble. Discovered tonight that the second pinion was broken. And the crystal is non Omega. And i broke the stem when i was going to see if the movement would fit inside the case. :(

Posted
7 hours ago, rogart63 said:

You can zoom in if you click the picture. 

This watch is giving me so much trouble. Discovered tonight that the second pinion was broken. And the crystal is non Omega. And i broke the stem when i was going to see if the movement would fit inside the case. :(

Stay with it Rogart. I will check for that small screw with tap ...I definitely have a stem, so keep your head up!

JC

Posted
7 hours ago, noirrac1j said:

Stay with it Rogart. I will check for that small screw with tap ...I definitely have a stem, so keep your head up!

JC

Great. Not giving up yet then? It's one of the most difficult and toughest movements i have worked on? Would maybe have been better to buy a working movement at Ebay? Without so much trouble? 

If you can find a screw noirrac1i i will have a go at it again. Learn by doing wrong as they say :)

Posted
On 11/12/2016 at 7:54 AM, rogart63 said:

Great. Not giving up yet then? It's one of the most difficult and toughest movements i have worked on? Would maybe have been better to buy a working movement at Ebay? Without so much trouble? 

If you can find a screw noirrac1i i will have a go at it again. Learn by doing wrong as they say :)

Rogart forgive my delay in responding.....these are tumultuous times in the U.S.

I do have the stem, but not the little screw with tap. Let me know via message and I'll send it to you.

 

JC

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hello Rogart,

I got your message, but could not post a picture there, so came here. I am guessing you mean the click spring position so that it cathes the ratchet wheel yes? Here is a picture:

 

Omeha 1020 click spring position.jpg

J

Posted

This is the screw i broke. Have got a new one. But under the bridge is a small spring. I wonder if the yellow gear should be pressing on to the ratchet wheel or there should be a gap between the gear and the ratchet. But now when i see this picture i have figured it out. Thanks Joe. wigwag.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, rogart63 said:

This is the screw i broke. Have got a new one. But under the bridge is a small spring. I wonder if the yellow gear should be pressing on to the ratchet wheel or there should be a gap between the gear and the ratchet. But now when i see this picture i have figured it out. Thanks Joe. wigwag.jpg

That gear will only move when the stem is in the winding position. I am glad to be able to help. One suggestion on the cannon pinion. make sure is properly seated and that the date corrector lever is engaging the secondary gear that connects with the cannon pinion. This is very important.

 

JC

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, clockboy said:

I noticed this guy has a 1020 movement. Looking at the tech sheets it looks very similar to the 1022. It might be worth a gamble if no success elsewhere .

http://www.obsoletewatchandclockparts.com/wristwatchmovementsLtoP.htm

Hello Clock,

Yes you are correct. The Omega 1020 and 1022 are very similar. The main difference is in the date corrector yoke and calendar works.

JC

Posted (edited)

The movement is assembled but unfortunately doesn't run. It work on the timegrapher but the hands doesn't move. I don't think it's the cannon pinion? As the hands a tight to move.DSC07498.JPG


 

Could it be this little gear that is slipping? Click on the picture to get a larger picture. DSC07499.JPG



 

 

Edited by rogart63
Posted

Can you move the hands with the crown, or is it very tight? You say it worked on the timegrapher, but the hands didn't move? What did the timegrapher readout look like?

 

JC

Posted

How can i be so stupid? 

Tinkered with it this morning. And when i removed the upper two screws in the movement.The one that holds the day disc.  It  started to run. Why? 

One of the screws is to long and put pressure on the hour wheel. 

It wasn't an original. So now i am going to check if it runs and look for a shorter screw or shortening it a little. 

Posted

Sounds like you have sorted it, hopefully a shorter correct screw fitted all will be good, I ~have encountered similar whereas a too long screw had been fitted by someone else, in my case the screw was touching the main spring barrel, causing the power reserve too bind up.

  • Like 1
Posted

This is the part. DSC07513.JPG

And one of the screws are to long. Where not an original screw. Found two shorter screws so no it's working and the setting of the time is not stiff anymore. DSC07514.JPG

No i am going to put the other things back. And hopefully get a working watch again. And my self esteem is going to get a real boast :) 

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...