Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Since June 8th will be my B-Day, and if all goes well I will also become father for the first time (well, that will probably NOT happen on the same day, but I can still wish, can't I?) I decided to pull the trigger on a watch I liked on eBay.

The only issue is that I did so, while surfing the site with my mobile phone, so the pictures were rather small...

Are you starting to get the picture of the issue, here?

Fact is, that after analyzing the seller pics on my PC, I started noticing "strange" things... I will leave the pics talk for themselves... The movement looks ok, as does the case, the permanent seconds hand and minute counter are detached from their pinions, but that was declared in the auction, so no issue.

The issue is that the dial markings appear not to match. Check the tachymeter marking for "60" which logically should be directly over and properly aligned with the 12 hour marking. Is it the picture angle that plays tricks on my eyes, or is it a bit shifted to the right??

I have not received the watch yet, so a personal inspection is yet to be made. Could eventually this be a reason to give the watch back? No mentio on a redial on the auction text... 

What do you experts think?

$_57 (4).JPG

$_57 (5).JPG

$_57 (10).JPG

$_57 (2).JPG

$_57 (3).JPG

$_57 (6).JPG

$_57 (8).JPG

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
Posted

A few things I see that are a bit strange:

- No brand name

- It doesn't say swiss made anywhere

- On the small dial to the left, you can clearly see that the "45" markers aren't aligned

- Strange markings on the outer section of the dial at the 12 o'clock, 1 o'clock and between 2 and 3 o'clock positions

  • Like 1
Posted

interesting. have you compared it to other ebay pics? i'd be curious to see what you find.

yeah - no "swiss made" on it is the first thing i noticed. another thing - the crystal bezel seems to be in remarkeable condition compared to the rest of the case. there's no schmutz on it where it meets the crystal. on the other hand, there is a bit of schmutz on the pushers and crown. could it be a replacement crystal? they might have cleaned up the bezel when they replaced it.

if it is a redial, they did a great job with the patina, but fell short on marking placement. that "12" and "60" misalignment is odd indeed.

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

 

oh - and congratulations on fatherhood. there's nothing like that euphoria. and it doesn't go away.

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, frenchie said:

A few things I see that are a bit strange:

- No brand name

- It doesn't say swiss made anywhere

- On the small dial to the left, you can clearly see that the "45" markers aren't aligned

- Strange markings on the outer section of the dial at the 12 o'clock, 1 o'clock and between 2 and 3 o'clock positions

13 minutes ago, ramrod said:

interesting. have you compared it to other ebay pics? i'd be curious to see what you find.

yeah - no "swiss made" on it is the first thing i noticed. another thing - the crystal bezel seems to be in remarkeable condition compared to the rest of the case. there's no schmutz on it where it meets the crystal. on the other hand, there is a bit of schmutz on the pushers and crown. could it be a replacement crystal? they might have cleaned up the bezel when they replaced it.

if it is a redial, they did a great job with the patina, but fell short on marking placement. that "12" and "60" misalignment is odd indeed.

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

 

oh - and congratulations on fatherhood. there's nothing like that euphoria. and it doesn't go away.

Spot on Frenchie on what I noticed too

Ramrod, thanks for the congrats, I am sure this is one thing I will never forget... :)

As per the Patina, actually I believe this is a common dial with normal patina, to which the misaligned markings were applied to make it more interesting.

Whatever the right answer might be, I have some original dials here with me, so it actually does not make any difference. The important thing is that the movement is intact and working well as decribed in the auction and that I can easily replace the dial with an original one (I won't resell the watch, it is for my personal use).

 

Posted
1 hour ago, ramrod said:

frenchie - are the "45"s supposed to line up?

Pretty sure...

 

Some links to pictures from a quick google image search:

219-700x400.jpg

 

14dabad2d8dfe075409c4831ccd8805db.jpg

 

One other thing I noticed: you have the 2 and 7 numbers, but not the 4 or the 10, which makes the dial not symmetrical. Should it be something like this??

 163273400_-two-registers-three-color-dia

 

Finally, a link to an ebay listing (not mine, informational only): http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-HYDEPARK-Military-Chronograph-Landeron-48-All-Original-Watch-L8-/371421599832?hash=item567a73d858:g:7QwAAOSwPcVVy26f

 

IMO, all things considered, it's really nitpicking ;) As long as you're happy with it, it will look good on your wrist I'm sure !

Posted

The more I look at the pictures, the more I think it is a redial, and a quite badly made one at that. But nevertheless, I will check it out when it arrives, and if it does look too quirky, I will replace the dial with an original one.

@frenchie: you are right, this is not the first landeron-based chrono I have, and all the ones I possess have the same layout as the ones in the pics you posted.

Attachd a pic of my HEMA Chronograph with Landeron 248 movement that I am wearng at the moment, and my Walker Chrono, also based on a L.248 (pic taken while servicing it).

1.jpg

landeron248_1.jpg

Posted

BTW: the Walker has no "swiss made" since it got so riuned and unreadable, I decided at the time (a couple of years ago) to just completely remove it. I do regret it since...

Posted

Congratulations on your new baby, Geoge! Is the new watch for him/her? You are getting ahead of yourself!! :D

Cheers,

Bob

Posted
5 hours ago, bobm12 said:

Congratulations on your new baby, Geoge! Is the new watch for him/her? You are getting ahead of yourself!! :D

Cheers,

Bob

It will be a Priincess, so "her".... and no, the watch is for me :P I already prepared something special for her, that I will only show when she'll be old enough to wear it.... ;)

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

And all our fears were correct.... it must be a redial, and a pretty bad one too....

P1010022.JPG

 

Either a redial, or the blue tachymeter scale was applied on a second moment... but please also note from the picture above that the chronograph minute dial hhole, on the right, is not perfectly round, but somewhat oval: it was milled through to better center the minute pinion, which makes me think this dial does not belong at all to this movement, but was later adapted.

Your thoughts?

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This is fascinating.  I always wonder what the thinking was behind actions like that.  A Landeron 248 isn't too uncommon I don't think so it seems strange that so much work would go into making the wrong dial work as opposed to just finding the right one.  On the other hand, it's just these kind of things that get me excited about watch restoration.  It's no fun if the watch you started with didn't have gremlins inside!

Congrats on fatherhood by the way.  I have two princesses of my own.  They're the best thing to ever happen to me.  :)

Posted
10 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

This is fascinating.  I always wonder what the thinking was behind actions like that.  A Landeron 248 isn't too uncommon I don't think so it seems strange that so much work would go into making the wrong dial work as opposed to just finding the right one.  On the other hand, it's just these kind of things that get me excited about watch restoration.  It's no fun if the watch you started with didn't have gremlins inside!

Congrats on fatherhood by the way.  I have two princesses of my own.  They're the best thing to ever happen to me.  :)

Hi RyMoeller and thanks for the congrats on my fatherhood, I still cannot wrap my head around it....

As per the thoughts behind a dodgy work like the one done on my watch, I honestly believe that it was a matter of laziness after all. The guy probably had a movement, a case and a dial, wanted to "bake" himself a working watch (probably to sell for a small profit on eBay - which he did btw) and didn't care if the pieces all fit properly together... He probably hoped the new owner didn't know/care/notice the incongruence.

We both got what we wanted, though: he got a bit of money, I got a working movement, a case and a dial to remind me how things "should not be done". I bought this watch actually for the spares.... so no real harm.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Final update on this saga.... I used a Landeron 151 to make a new watch using the case and a correct and original Chronograph Suisse dial, since the L48 movement has some issues I still need to resolve.

This is the final result.

IMG_20160720_070221500.jpg

IMG_20160720_070413272_HDR.jpg

IMG_20160720_070517100.jpg



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I tried pushing to dome the washer in and had no success, but stuffing it full of o-ring gaskets worked much better than I expected. It takes some pressure but not as much as you might imagine, but it does take patience ... and a couple of dozen small gaskets. I used the pendant tube of a watch case to stuff the gaskets in as I didn't have a way to machine a tool to suit.
    • I can't answer your question, sorry, but you probably don't what to transfer the spring to a new wheel. Springs and wheels are paired ("vibrated" together) to get the right timing and transferring the spring to a new wheel is quite likely to see you minutes per day out with no way to correct it. Some may tell you to replace the balance staff, but if you're a beginner you're probably better off sourcing a replacement "balance complete" if you can: staff, roller, wheel and spring already assembled as a unit.
    • I'm sure it's the ancien. My measurements: A = 342. The slight bend in the pivot would make much less than a thousandth of a mm difference to this so I don't think 348 is plausible unless there has been significant wear on the pivots. B is hard to measure without first removing the balance wheel. I measured to the other side of the balance wheel as best I could (263) then subtracted the thickness of the wheel (69) to get 194. This could easily be three or four hundredths out, so 195 looks right. (196 could also be right.) J couldn't be measured. I did my best to measure where the balance wheel has been riveted on and got about 95, so 85 before riveting is plausible. (60 is not.) G again couldn't be measured without first removing the roller. I get 37 where the staff emerges from the roller so 41 at the other end of the taper seems plausible. (43 is also plausible to me.) K = 60. (Definitely larger than 55.)   I've never replaced a balance staff; it'll be a new adventure for me. I'll have to read up on how to maximise my chance of removing the old one without damaging the balance wheel without having access to a lathe. I also need to explore how to remove the roller without damaging it. I won't actually place an order until I've gone through the rest of the movement. With the number of issues I've already found, I'll be amazed if I don't have more surprises in store. There are some watch part suppliers in Australia but nothing like Cousins or Otto Frei or Jules Borel. AllTimeCo is fine for basic parts for modern watches: batteries, bands, some crowns, stems, seals, movements, some tools, etc., but not really anything for vintage watches. Australian Jewellers Supplies is similar. Cousins charges about £9 for shipping to Australia which is about AU$19 and not too bad (considering Australian parcel post is $11) but I still want to minimise the number of times I'm paying it. I need to explore other options closer to home. There may be something in Singapore or China that would have what I want and ship it faster/more economically.  
    • Hi, I just finished the service of a Rolex 3135. Amplitude is great, 295 degrees horizontal after 2 hours and 280 after 12 hours. Vertical positions are 25 degrees down on those. I am however seeing a rate variation with temperature. I have 0 SPD on wrist, say 38 degrees and +7 SPD at 18 degrees room temperature. That equates to +0.35 SPD which is within spec I believe (+-0.5 SPD/ Deg C max). It just seems more than I would expect from such a high quality movement. To put that in context, I see similar rate variation with temperature for a Seiko 7S26. Just wondering what you guys see. Thanks, Steve.
    • For years I've done it the el-cheapo way (read: cleaning by hand). Bought a 2nd Elma S15(H) ultra-sonic, including proper cleaning-fluids (Elma WF Pro (cleaning) & Elma Suprol Pro (rinse)) and entered a complete different cleaning world. These cleaning fluids are none-water based and not that easy to obtain. Initially I bought these fluids in Germany "SKSONIC" (www.sksonic.de) but last year they stopped shipping international. Perhaps they resumed international shipping? You can always ask them. You could also ask @VWatchie, he lives "next-door". As for the fumes; I use the ultra-sonic in my garage, partly for the fumes, but more for our dog ...... he goes "bananas" when I switch on the ultra-sonic. Oh, next on your list (if you consider watch-repair as a long-time hobby), a Microscope (up to 50x is enough).  Pegwood leaves, observed under the microscope that is, whole tree-trunks behind 🫣 Ultra-sonic, in combination with proper cleaning fluids, takes care of the cleaning.
×
×
  • Create New...