Jump to content

Timex 21 Jewel!


jeffc83

Recommended Posts

I started a new topic because this isn't any ordinary Timex...this one actually has jewels and 21 of them, lol.  Also to my surprise, I noticed a little cote de geneve in there, wow, just wow...Apparently, Timex felt the need to add this but NOT use screws so I can service it the right way?  No words there, haha.  The following pictures show a 1969 21 Jewel Manual Wind before and after the watchpocolipse;)  Man, did this one need a lot of work.  The stem was literally rusted out towards the crown and it was wound tight.  This one took a longer bath than the others and the "swish" was more aggressive;)  In the end, I ended up with another beautiful watch and it too keeps very good time! (+/- 9 sec day so far)  In between projects, I serviced a Helbros as well....will post it up soon. 

post-1795-0-04066800-1458049687_thumb.pn

post-1795-0-99819000-1458049711_thumb.jp

post-1795-0-00080000-1458049715_thumb.pn

post-1795-0-92079000-1458049724_thumb.jp

post-1795-0-78994800-1458049729_thumb.jp

Edited by jeffc83
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done Jeff, but this is a watch repair forum and we like to see pictures of the engine, not just the bodywork! ;)

 

That would normally help but this is a Timex man, LOL ;)   I'll get some shots of the ol' dunk and swish method and will post them here.  I'll also take a few shots of this one since the decoration on the movement is quite nice!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would've been amazing if they used screws versus rivets on this one;)  To me, it looks nicer but is still an ordinary Timex movement.  As a comparison, I attached a pic of a standard movement that I serviced last night.

 

As a side note, the Timex bug is starting to go away so I'll be going back to nice Swiss movements again soon, 17 Jewel and up;)

post-1795-0-34659100-1458133722_thumb.jp

Edited by jeffc83
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found that entire tear-down really fascinating.  That movement really looks odd.  And what about the nylon shock ring around the movement?  Timex were pretty out-there designing such a thing.  Overall the restored watch looks great!  I love that 60s style.  Is it a pin lever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oldhippy; they're not that bad, lol.  They actually sold for a ridiculous cost of $65-70 back in the 60's, which was it's ultimate demise. (no one would pay that much so it failed)

 

Stroppy; yes, it has a pin-lever but the Jeweled models are a "jewel lever", which is quite interesting to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With something like this a gasket seal for instance if i cant find the relevant information i would use instinct to decide what fits and works best. You have the original gasket ( well maybe its original or hopefully it is )so its fairly easy to determine what material to use. Shape , for that i would look at the gasket seatings, are there grooves or recesses in either the case back or case or both, what shape are the grooves, flat or round etc, how does the gasket sit and behave in those seatings. Next thickness,that is going to be a bit of a guess, especially if the gasket is a soft one that has been heavily compressed over time. This is where a selection is going to come in handy, personally i would be choosing one that is giving me the feel of compression as its coming into contact with both of the mating surfaces. But not so much that the gasket is going to squash out and become distorted, again this is guesswork and feel is required with the allowance of compression over time, something you may want to check after six months. This part is a little moot as without a pressure test, good water resistance is not assured so the watch needs to treated as such and not as if it were a new diving watch ( not that i would treat any new diving watch as if were ). What you want to expect from your efforts is a little accidental rain catch, if you want more water resistance guarantee then a professional gasket replacement and pressure test is what you should be seeking which will be more than the value of this watch. Coincidentally i have the same watch, been searching for a stem for it for a while now. 
    • It might not be a hook it might be something like this. But still the mainspring is catching on something on the slip ring because it doesn't have its own outer slipping part like the modern ones. The image below came from some vintage Omega thing I'll have to see if I can find where that has gone to.documentation A different book has this          
    • I did not see a hook on the slip ring. I will check again tomorrow.
    • I think I'm having a confusion here? You would apply the breaking grease to the inside of the barrel then the slip ring would go inside. Then the mainspring goes in and it catches on the hook on the slip ring.
    • Thank you for the once again very thorough and informative reply. I'm sure at this point it's academic, but I'm always curious to know best practices. This then implies that If I'm planning to reuse the old mainspring (which I am), I should also reinstall the slip ring. I will do that and apply braking grease to the inside of the slip ring as if it were the barrel. This makes the most sense to me. Also, that bit about the center cannon pinion is very helpful. That wasn't in the tech sheet I have (attached) dated 1970. Omega 1001(1).pdf
×
×
  • Create New...