Jump to content

Photographing Watches

Alaskamick

By Alaskamick
in Tools & Equipment

 Share

Recommended Posts

Alaskamick WRT Addict

Alaskamick

Posted
Posted

Does anyone have suggestions for a low priced simple camera for producing really good close up photos of watches.

 

All of the DSLR cameras are much too complicated for straight forward simple shots and are designed for doing a multitude of complex things, none of which I need.

 

I have a decent stand on which to mount a camera, good LED lighting but not a suitable camera.

 

I want to mount the camera and leave it in place and only use it for watches.

 

Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated.

 

Many thanks, Mike

JumboSlim New Member

JumboSlim

Posted
Posted

Hi,

 

I'd happily recommend a Fuji HS10, it's a bridge camera with great macro capabilities, but also with full manual control for focus, metering, white balance etc.

They are a few years old now and available online for good prices, I recently sold my 3rd for £30.

 

attached is a shot I took with one a couple of years ago.

post-1835-0-39117900-1455886885_thumb.jp

WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted

I have two Fuji Finepix cameras of different vintages - both excellent instruments.

 

When you get one, read reviews and compare lens quality rather than number of megapixels. My older Fuji is 4Mpixels and the lens is superb. Both have inbuilt macro capabilities.

 

Cheers,

 

Will

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted

Wonderful shot by JumboSlim. Remember "inbuilt macro capability" is nothing more that marketing name for zoom quick setting for zoom and few others. Nice to have but no optical qualities are added/

ramrod Super WRT Addict

ramrod

Posted
Posted

JSlim - what is a "bridge camera"? i've not heard that term before.

 

i agree wholeheartedly with Will. i own a canon T3 that is very capable, but i also use some of the older SD lenses because i like the manual focus capability. but the 50mm lenses i use are NOT that great. they don't live up to the capability of the camera. i need better lenses.

 

also, do not discount the simple phone camera. i know - heresy. but some of the best pictures of my stuff has come from my droid camera. the phone cameras are far and away better than they were only a few years ago. for most people, it's the only camera that they have, so phone manufacturers are making them better all of the time.

  • Like 1
WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted

A bridge camera is a sort of cross between a compact point-and-shoot and a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex), i.e. point-and-shoot with some manual control. I had a Sony bridge camera for about 5 months - hated it. The lens was rubbish, making nonsense of its "20 Megapixels" boast. Got rid of it and bought my Canon 70D. There are some excellent bridge cameras out there - the Sony was just not one of them.

WileyDave WRT Addict

WileyDave

Posted
Posted

Thanks Willfly, I just purchased a Fuji finepix S8600 it came out around 2014 for a little over $100 usd, has 7cm macro capability and 36x zoom, I will post some new pics after learning curve!

  • 1 month later...
Alienfox Watch Enthusiast

Alienfox

Posted
Posted

As an Ex pro photographer (still do a bit from time to time) I have several really good cameras, but I tend to use my Canon G12 for photographing my watches which are placed inside a light tent with strobe/Flash heads supplying the light, great if you have a studio and everything available 24/7, However, the little G12 with some cheap aquarium LED Lamps works just as well, one of my other hobbies is keeping marine corals and fish, so I purchased a few spare lamps just in case on ebay for £7.00 each, BARGIN.

A couple of examples below.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Hidom-Overhead-LED-Clip-on-Aquarium-Fish-Tank-Lighting-Lights-Lamp-Flexible-Arm-/141395741658?var=&hash=item20ebd7cbda:m:mElwY3N0URqJfPcTxpodKyA

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Aquarium-Fish-Tank-LED-Clip-Light-Lighting-Lamp-Flexible-Arm-White-Blue-Color-UK-/221374247602?var=&hash=item338aeef2b2:m:mVePNbWSKk3RinaFBpdpc5Q

  • Like 2
Alaskamick WRT Addict

Alaskamick

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Alienfox, can you tell me how many LEDs are needed for a really well lit shot as I think I will purchase a couple of these.

I did buy an LED ring light which is purpose made to fit on the lens but when I tried it out there was a perfect reflection of the clrcle of LEDs in the shot which virtually obliterated the watch itself. Is there anything I could do to stop the reflection before I buy these ?

I'm using a Nikon D70 with an AF-S Micro NIKKOR 40mm 1:2.8G lens mounted on a proper stand.

The photos are beautiful with this camera but spoilt by the reflection of the LEDs

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Alienfox Watch Enthusiast

Alienfox

Posted
Posted

If you place the lights at 45o above the watch and 45o at the sides you should eliminate nearly all reflections?  Also if you place a tissue over the lights it acts like a soft-box.

DJT2 WRT Addict

DJT2

Posted
Posted

I've been experimenting with bouncing the light off a white peice of card. I'm quite pleased with some of the results, but I'm definitely going to make a light box

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a lightbox and true white LED lighting, but I always get the best results with natural light.

 

25814978492_a0353ab007_c.jpg

Edited by jdm
rogart63 Distinguished Member

rogart63

Posted
Posted (edited)

A cheap light box is a IKEA paper waste basket FNISS. It's transparent . If you just can figure out how to cut the hole in it? It's a little hard plastic. If you need to cut a hole? 

$1.99 Fniss light tent

 

Edited by rogart63
  • Like 1
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Alaskamick said:

jdm.  Can you tell me how many LEDs are in the lamps you use are there are 3 different sizes available on the site you posted.

15W, It's probably even too much.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tIB
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By tIB · Posted

      Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • Malocchio
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By Malocchio · Posted

      I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • nickelsilver
      A lathe with indexing that won't break the bank?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • SidKop
      Opinions on Seiko's 4R and 6R movement quality from those more able to judge

      By SidKop · Posted

      I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
    • watchweasol
      Greetings From Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

      By watchweasol · Posted

      Welcome to the forum enjoy
×
×
  • Create New...