Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

those are gorgeous! i love the old chronos - and WOW! do they look complicated. there was so much work put into the dials. they have such character.

Posted

Love the Chrono Rafal. I have one of these waiting a service and an older one that I've been wearing a while.

Usually these have a red centre second hand with a pear shaped pip on the end, has yours been replaced? Did you follow Roland Ranfft's advice for rufurbishing the chrono pinion?

S

Posted

Chrono is in fact restoration job. It came with broken glass, bend second pinion and missing second hand. I got replacement second pinion in quite good condition so no need for washer replacement. Second hand is not original as I couldnt find proper one, Ive seen some which suppouse to be for that model but I wasnt happy with them. My watchmaker replaced tube on one of hands I had in my parts pile and it fits ok. Watch look cool and keeps good time so it will stay like that until I get proper hand.

Posted (edited)

i have 5 , bugger to get working, problem is the perishable part of the chrono, uses a vertical clutch

Roland Ranfft's advice is to replace the rubber (or leather on early versions) washer with a piece cut from a crystal protector sticker. I didn't have any of those so used two layers of an AA car winscreen sticker. I just punched it out with punches from a staking set, and glued it down with superglue. Roland says that the thickness is not important as that can be adjusted out, but one layer was too thin for that.

The Essembl-o-graph watchmaking manuals include one for the Pierce 134, which explains the function of every part and how to set all of the adjusters, which was invaluable. I actually had more difficulty with the base movement as I fitted a new balance complete and really struggled to form enough of a gap on the terminal curve to keep the second coil away from the curb pin and keep the collet centred at the same time.

Just my experience!

S

Edited by StuartBaker104
  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...