Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a new article titled "Calibrating computer sound-system clock with GPS" at wlysenko.blogspot.com. This gives some detail about the GPS calibrator I mentioned previously. I have tried this on six computers. Watch-O-Scope reports daily rates of 2.2, 0.9, 2.1, -3.9, 0.9, and 0.9 s/d for the GPS signal.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, wlysenko said:

clock with GPS

Thanks for the document. It is a relatively inexpensive way to calibrate WOS.
I also saw the other articles posted on your blog. My attention was drawn to the article about the degausser.
I would like to invite you to see a post I made on YouTube on the subject. It is an empirical solution, but it works better than ebay degaussing devices.

https://youtu.be/ochzrXkHHF4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, guidovelasquez said:

I would like to invite you to see a post I made on YouTube on the subject. It is an empirical solution, but it works better than ebay degaussing devices.

https://youtu.be/ochzrXkHHF4

Thanks. These instant demagnetizers, as I call them, are very effective and easy to use. But as some commenter pointed out, a capacitor charged to high voltage can be very dangerous.

And speaking of inexpensive, I found (see my demagnetizer article) that it is possible to build an inexpensive gaussmeter.  A hall sensor costs only about $2.00.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2021 at 1:24 AM, wlysenko said:

"The output goes to a 3.5-mm-plug audio cable and is plugged into the line input of the sound card."

I love the idea of GPS time based calibration! 

Could a GPS receiver PPL/SCL signal be connected directly to a piezo element? (so that it could generate audio ticks/pulses loud enough to be detected by a timegrapher microphone) or must there be a driver stage/impedance matching between the PPL output and a piezo element?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hattori said:

I love the idea of GPS time based calibration! 

Precision timing aside, FYI we have a dedicated section where it's considered polite for new members to introduce themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2021 at 1:44 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

May be the ultimate sensor

maybe we should just hack an optical microphone? or even better yet hack a fiber optic microphone. the fiber optics is nice because you can run the optical source from somewhere else you don't have to have the laser there or whatever the light sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hattori said:

Could a GPS receiver PPL/SCL signal be connected directly to a piezo element? (so that it could generate audio ticks/pulses loud enough to be detected by a timegrapher microphone) or must there be a driver stage/impedance matching between the PPL output and a piezo element?

I think you are asking about using GPS on a stand-alone timing system, not a computer-based system like Watch-O-Scope.  I have done something similar to check the clock in a computer (a Sony) that did not have any audio input jacks but did have a built-in microphone. I connected the GPS PPS signal to the  line input of my usual computer and turned on the speakers. Now I could hear the PPS "ticks."  I placed the Sony computer, running the Watch-O-Scope software connected to the built-in microphone, near a speaker and did the timing. It worked. I don't know if the piezo element of your machine would pick up sounds in the air but it is worth trying. Turn up the volume and bring the mic close to the speaker. You may have to reduce the duty factor of the PPS signal (10% by default) to make this work because both the rising and falling edges produce a tick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wlysenko, I am only looking for an easy way to calibrate the sound-card clock. Just like you do. BUT I cannot use a line input into the sound card. So I am just trying to figure out if the PPS signal can be output into a simple transducer, like a piezo element? That transducer is then placed on the timegrapher microphone and Watch-O-Scope can be calibrated using the PPS pulses, rather than using less precise ticks from a quartz watch.

Edited by Hattori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hattori said:

and precise.

what about witschi's concerned that you should be using a GPS specifically used for timing purposes?

15 minutes ago, Hattori said:

piezo element

rather than a piezo what about a small magnetic speaker? Magnetic speakers have coils and more mass than a disk. Because for calibration we probably don't care but for an actual watch pickup were supposed be picking up a vibration not an audio sound. So I don't know how much vibrating a disk does versus a moving coil.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hattori said:

Wlysenko, I am only looking for an easy way to calibrate the sound-card clock. Just like you do. BUT I cannot use a line input into the sound card

Okay, here is what you want, I think. I fed the PPS output of the GPS receiver/antenna module (that would normally go to the line input in my normal  operation) into a piezo disk. I think it is the same kind of disk I used when I made my WOS microphone. The output is very faint. I can hardly hear it. I placed this output piezo touching the WOS mic piezo as seen in the photo.

piezo-mike.jpg.53c63b1d52a6566c4d12591da650b416.jpg

Then I ran the WOS mic into my WOS preamp, which was fed into the audio interface line input (exactly as I normally do). Here is what it looks like on the WOS scope view.

piezomethod.PNG.7d0788b13293e2ce8b6cc5c9ba5cf4b2.PNG

The GPS PPS is set to 5 Hz and 10% duty factor. The WOS software gives me my usual daily rate of +2.2 s/d.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! That is exactly what I am looking for! Thank you so much for testing this!

So maybe there needs to be a small amplification stage between the PPS signal and the transducer.  Good to know.

I wonder why the piezo creates two peaks from the square wave? The graph looks almost like one from a mechanical watch. And your timing result seems to be quite similar to the result from the other day. 

I ordered a GPS yesterday so I will soon be testing this.

"The GPS PPS is set to 5 Hz and 10% duty factor" What does Duty Factor mean?

Edited by Hattori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

what about witschi's concerned that you should be using a GPS specifically used for timing purposes?

rather than a piezo what about a small magnetic speaker? 

Are you wondering if I will loose sleep if Witschi gets to sell one less £1.595 GPS receiver/antenna? Hmmm, let me get back on that one.. 🙂

Thanks to wlysenko's test proving that a piezo transducer connected to the PPS can give an output loud enough to trigger the WOS, a simple earbud may be even better suited as a transducer thanks to lower impedance that may result in a higher output? I will give that a try before adding a simple amplification stage - as soon as I receive my £8.83 GPS receiver/antenna.

Edited by Hattori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hattori said:

Are you wondering if I will loose sleep if Witschi gets to sell one less £1.595 GPS receiver/antenna? Hmmm, let me get back on that one..

actually I was concerned about whether you'd be upset that? You going to go to all the trouble to calibrate your timing machine yet you're shortchanging yourself on a substandard GPS receiver.

What which she is recommending is a specific GPS for timing. So they claim a normal GPS is only good for 0.01-0.001 seconds.  whereas their GPS receiver claims to be Achieved tolerance of 1 PPS= +/- 15 - 75 ns (nano seconds), related to the atomic clock of the GPS system. = 0.015 – 0.075 milliseconds.  So how much sleep will either one of us have lost being concerned over the inaccuracy of a common GPS?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did note their claim on the accuracy of their GPS receiver. I guess they use it to motivate the very high price of their GPS. 

Meanwhile I will sleep even better knowing I saved £1.585 by going for only 0.01-0.001 seconds accuracy 🙂 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hattori said:

I did note their claim on the accuracy of their GPS receiver. I guess they use it to motivate the very high price of their GPS. 

what's interesting about their pricing is that it's an old GPS providing I'm reading the specs correctly. There is a link below to a timing GPS. If you look on eBay the Chinese have a circuit board with either the 8T or the cheaper older 6T version. But it does look like the 8T beats out witschi for specifications and price looks quite reasonable unfortunately doesn't have the antenna so you have to get that. Plus doesn't look like there's any specifications for the board minor challenge.

 

https://www.u-blox.com/en/product/neolea-m8t-series

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ordered this one from their Polish warehouse, yesterday. : https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001316189127.html 

fully aware there may not be a PPS socket on the board inside it (since it has the USB interface) BUT I like the fact that you get a M8030-KT GPS, an antenna, a housing and a "PSU" and I will try to find the PPS trace from the chip on the circuit board and solder a cable to it. Or just take the output voltage that lights up the "Syncro" 1 s blinking LED. I am just not sure if it has the same high accuracy as the PPS signal?

Should that not work I also ordered this:

GY-NEO6MV2 GPS Module Aircraft Flight Controller APM 2.5 TE518+ Flugregler | eBay

so that I will be sure to get the PPS signal.

 

Edited by Hattori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am not sure for the terms in english, but if I directly translate from Bulgarian or Russian, there are 'magnetic soft' and 'magnetic hard' magnetic materials. The first group will not get magnetised, thow they will be attracted by magnets. The soft iron for example. The second group, like hardened steel, will get magnetised. So non magnetic hairspring aloys belong to the first group.
    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angle the watch had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
    • Drilling is going to be difficult, firstly because the drill bits are so thin and brittle, expect to break a few. The second issue is access to the 'hole', as the other lug will be in the way, meaning that you will have to drill at a slight angle, putting a bending stress on the drill bit and with the slightest drop in concentration .... and back to my first point. I would be tempted to grind them flat with a Dremel type tool or small jewelers file, and then put a center punch in the center of the bit to be drilled so the drill bit doesn't skip around and break... but expect this to be slow and frustrating work. By the time you have done 4 of these you'll be an expert and can come back and tell us all the best way to do it if you go down this route. However, I would seriously consider What @watchweasol said and drill from the outside-in, this will ensure straight holes without having to work around the other lugs. It may be worthwhile making yourself a simple paper template so you can be sure to match the position of each hole before drilling. In the end you will be left with 4 holes on the outside of the lugs, but many cases are made this way and unless you are looking for it you probably won't notice or realise that it's not the way the watch was meant to be in the first place.
    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
×
×
  • Create New...