Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, sorry if i'm being an idiot here. I have never run into a caseback like this before and I am at a loss for how to remove it. The watch is a front loader, the dial is too big to come out of the back. There are no clear notches for a case knife on the back, only a small hole that looks like it could fit a screwdriver. Looks like someone else has tried prying it open which made me think it's hot I open it. I tried prying it with a screwdriver, but felt that if i applied any more force it would just scratch or damage the case so i stopped. I took off the crystal and dial, to see if the watch had a split stem however it does not. I cannot access the setting lever screw from the front so am unsure of how to get this movement out. Hoping that I am just being a noob and the answer is simple. 

Thanks in advance for any help. 

WhatsApp Image 2024-06-10 at 20.17.36_07711813.jpg

WhatsApp Image 2024-06-10 at 20.17.14_5296735e.jpg

Posted (edited)

 You have a gold plated case and stainless steel back (two different metal), this tells me the back is removable.

The one piece cases, ( which I think are called monoblock ) tells us it has to be a front loader. 

I would place a piece of 1/2mm thick  cardboard on the " hole" and pry the back plate with screwdriver, the cardboard will hopefully keep the case from getting scratched. 

Removing the winding crown might let the movement to come out. 

The movement in your watch is likely to be a rotary in-house, thus collectable. 

 

Rgds

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

The movement in your watch is likely to be a rotary in-house

I'm pretty certain that Rotary never made their own movements. I have only ever seen AS, ETA, and Peseux movements inside Rotary watches, and some Chinese in more recent examples.

  • Like 2
Posted

Update: The caseback is finally off! The case knives I have are too large to fit inside such a small indent, and I also sadly do not have one of the screw in tools with a very narrow tip, which is what I most likely needed in the first place. In the end i just forced in a screwdriver with a bit more force that i was really comfortable with and the caseback shot off. Somehow I did not damage the case any further which I am happy about. 

Thanks for your advice, next payday I will most likely increase my caseback removal arsenal. 

Also for anyone interested the movement inside is an AS 1795

Posted
40 minutes ago, Marc said:

I'm pretty certain that Rotary never made their own movements. I have only ever seen AS, ETA, and Peseux movements inside Rotary watches, and some Chinese in more recent examples.

 For some reason I keep thinking Rotary and Longines are related, weren't both company  established by folks who were somehow related?  Did Rotary use movements made by Longines. 

I think this is the second time you corrected same mistake of mine on this point.

Rgds

Posted
38 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 For some reason I keep thinking Rotary and Longines are related, weren't both company  established by folks who were somehow related?  Did Rotary use movements made by Longines. 

I think this is the second time you corrected same mistake of mine on this point.

Rgds

Something tells me the same or something similar Joe, i have read something somewhere, doesn't mean to say it was accurate information though.  Oh  and Joe , where the hell have you been hiding ?

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Something tells me the same or something similar Joe, i have read something somewhere, doesn't mean to say it was accurate information though.  Oh  and Joe , where the hell have you been hiding ?

You may be right Joe, I've just looked back at my notes I have Longines , Wittnauer,  Record and Rotary together so i have definitely read about some connection between them.

I found a little snippet that stated Longines SA owned Rotary in 1972.  You only have to look at the winged logos to wonder 🤔

Screenshot_20240611-174528_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240611-174728_Google.jpg

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 Oh  and Joe , where the hell have you been hiding ?

 Hi matey, I was right here reading you all discussions, but the site wouldn't let me post a single word, then I found Richard's email on his profile and sent him two msg's I am not sure if he ever received any of them, or was Mark Lovic who fixed the issue.

It's hapened  before, so to get back I registere as a new member, say  nucejoe1   which awaits Mark's approval, he recognizes it's same ole nucejoe and fixes the issue.

Mark knows I used to be a superadict, need a fix, always let's me back in WRT

Rgds

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Posted

How strange, I  have been locked out of my account before, had to set up a new account and say " it's me, help". Didn't receive an email, try again ASAP and I'll see if it arrives, if so, I can get you reinstated. 

Let me know when you have sent the email. 

Posted
Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

 Didn't receive an email, try again ASAP and I'll see if it arrives, if so, I can get you reinstated. 

Let me know when you have sent the email. 

Hi Rich, your email seem to have an extra underline  "_"

I think I tried emailing you with and without that second underline.

PM sent.

Rgds

Posted

I used to think that ancient history was at the best flakely but modern history isn't so much better.  Personally I think that Rotary and Longines weren't connected but I could be wrong.  Who knows, with all the conflicting evidence ?

Posted

The place I worked we were longines agents. I had all their equipment all there service manuals. We were also agents for Rotary. Longines are in a different class. Rotary were bog standard. Again I say they are different and have no connection. Don't believe all you read on the internet.   

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I used to think that ancient history was at the best flakely but modern history isn't so much better.  Personally I think that Rotary and Longines weren't connected but I could be wrong.  Who knows, with all the conflicting evidence ?

There isn't much evidence at all to say they were , just that little piece of info , no idea how accurate that might be but i could not find anything else. The two watches are curious though , both claim to be Olympic editions and they're surely from the same factory the design is almost identical with a slightly different case, maybe just a one collaboration that has been made out to be more than just that.

Posted
On 6/11/2024 at 4:38 PM, Nucejoe said:

 For some reason I keep thinking Rotary and Longines are related, weren't both company  established by folks who were somehow related?  Did Rotary use movements made by Longines. 

I think this is the second time you corrected same mistake of mine on this point.

Rgds

Rotary usually have either ETA or AS movements in them. I work on them a lot. Vintage Rotary are under appreciated watches, usually with a nice movement. You can pick them up dirt cheap, spares are easy to find and they're usually really nice to work on.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/11/2024 at 4:10 PM, oldhippy said:

Don't believe all you read on the internet.   

You mean all that stuff about aliens and black helicopters isn't true?

Posted
12 hours ago, eccentric59 said:

You mean all that stuff about aliens and black helicopters isn't true?

I think you have to be mad if you think we are the only ones in this ever increasing universe. When you think of how old the universe is and compare it to how young Earth is. Aliens as you call them are probably millions of years technically advanced then us. Do I believe the U S A are hiding information from us. The quick answer is yes. I follow Steven Macon Greer if you have never heard of him look him up. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A helpful way in aid of assembly is to place all the wheels in their respective places, place to plate on the top and fit a couple of the nuts onto the pillars. This stops all the wheels wobbling about as they are lightly held by the plate, you can manoeuvre the pivots into their holes, using a tool , usually home made or can be bought on eBay. I made my own. As the pivots align and fall into place screw the nuts down a bit to keep up the tension on the plate untill all wheels are in place then tighten down sufficiently to keep the plate in place whilst checking the end shake on ALL wheels and their location when all is good only then tighten down the plate.
    • I'd say my Pultra 10 lathe. It is just so well made and everything fits so tightly together.
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy. 
    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...