Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, VWatchie said:

There's no need to be condescending Frank. All I am trying to convey is that there is no risk of the stake reaching the hole in the balance when using a Platax tool.

But that is a different pair of shoes, I never talked of that. I assume that the tool will not reach the hole, no matter what you use. Easy with simple stake, too, if you keep the stake between your fingers while hammering.
When I push the staff out after removing the hub, I use a stake with cylindrical pivot, a bit smaller than the hole.  

As I said, no punching method or tool can protect the hole 
- from widening by the distorted staff
- from distorting hole and balance arm to a funnel-like shape if the rivet is too thick (happened to me decades ago).

I apologize if I seemed to be condescending, tried to say it friendly, but meanwhile I am tired of repeating the facts. But I know now, we had different issues in mind.

Regards, Frank 

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, praezis said:

I apologize if I seemed to be condescending, tried to say it friendly, but meanwhile I am tired of repeating the facts. But I know now, we had different issues in mind.

No worries Frank! I see where you're coming from and thanks for clarifying! 🙂

I would really hope someone, @Jon(!?) would make a video of how to punch out a staff using a staking set without first removing the hub or the rivet. Yes, Frank, you have clearly demonstrated that it is destructive, but for those of us who have no other option and are willing to risk it.

I haven't tried it but one dear WRT member whom we haven't seen in a long time, @HSL (anyone in touch with him?), recommended I try to remove as much as possible of the rivet before punching it out by using a razor-sharpened stake. Yes, I know, it is the hub that you must remove using a lathe, but at least I would think/hope that removing the rivet would be a step in the right direction.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1)

I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054

Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole.

I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool.

IMG_3814.thumb.jpeg.c6222840640ef04ee8901727bc98445c.jpeg

IMG_3815.thumb.jpeg.fcfc017c92a02c04cb9a2542a1bcdf19.jpeg

Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow.

Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk;

IMG_3817.thumb.jpeg.5a425ea4918613f1710216cbab23a83f.jpeg

IMG_3820.thumb.jpeg.3f6c0f66987245f9b6251c841159ea6e.jpeg

That worked and the disk was hand-driven.

Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste.

One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble".

I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that at that point there wasn't much left of the seat.

IMG_3823.thumb.jpeg.e49e98c997352fa5d78490c90b819c85.jpeg

Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out.

Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm.

The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all.

IMG_3824.thumb.jpeg.158d8afa9f92e2224b0fb5e0587bbe3a.jpeg

Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat.

In my case, it worked perfect 🙂

I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 5
Posted

This way is dangerous. The problem is that the collet is not expected to be perfect in this tool and the wheel used for the grinding is big and easy can touch the balance wheel. Can You show the bottom side of the balance wheel?

Posted
9 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

The problem is that the collet is not expected to be perfect in this tool and the wheel used for the grinding is big and easy can touch the balance wheel

The whole process and the progress are closely observed, it's hand-driven and very controlled. I can't see the "danger", unless you are watching the TV while doing it.

As you could have read,

10 hours ago, Endeavor said:

no damage done to the wheel at all.

and in this quote "wheel" is the balance-wheel.

  • Like 1
Posted

I also see a bit of danger for the wheel, at least you have to keep away from it and may get a too thick rest ring. My rest rings are about 0.05 mm.

Better way would be a grinding wheel touching the staff with its circumference.

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat.

Not having all the fancy equipment, this is a way I came up with. I never said it was the best, the most ideal or the safest way.

Working on balances is always a delicate task whereby full concentration & common sense should prevail.

I was well aware of the "dangers" / short comings involved, hence my "warnings", as quoted above.

The balance wheel of the Omega was nice true, flat and one could clearly see how much gap there was left before the grinding wheel would touch the balance wheel. I stopped when the generously applied diamond paste started to touch the rim of the balance wheel, which turned out to be with a seat thickness left of 0.1mm. Tapping the remainder of the staff out went easy and flawless.

My idea of penning this article was to show/share a way which, in my case, succeeded perfectly. If deemed to risky, or if the balance wheel is not true or has a wobble, other methods have to be followed (which BTW, as you can read in this thread, are rife with "dangers" as well)

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/8/2024 at 10:26 AM, VWatchie said:

Thanks! I never heard the expression before but it makes sense. Looking at the pictures again it says "braclet" (misspelled).

You often see the term used on old watch part boxes.  Staffs for bracelet watches, timing washers for bracelet wstches etc.

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 3/5/2024 at 6:00 PM, VWatchie said:

I watched the entire video again and I can't recall him mentioning that, but he does state that the Platax "breaks the rivet without damaging the balance wheel". Also, I think it is worth noting that there is a significant difference between punching out a staff using a staking set and using a Platax tool. When using a Platax there's zero risk that the punch reaches down to the hole in the balance as the punch is hindered from reaching that far. It is the very idea behind the Platax. I think the risk of enlarging the hole in the balance is minimal when using a Platax and no greater or even less than when riveting the new staff. Also, as I understand it, using a lathe to remove the rivet isn't foolproof either.

If you look closely at the end result you will see that the staff is not centred. You can see side to side movement on the balance rim as it rotates. I think the hole in the balance wheel has got enlarged over the years as it's an old watch and has probably seen numerous staffs in its lifetime. Going through the same drama myself right now with an old watch and the slightly off centre hole has played havoc with the poise. Going to make it the best as I can by moving the rim weights to compensate.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...