Jump to content

Seiko 5 Problem Identified...


Recommended Posts

Some of you may remember that, some weeks ago, I picked up a cheap Seiko 5 automatic for a tenner - not the nice one with the blue face that I posted about recently, a different one - and discovered that it wasn't holding a wind.

 

I took the case back off and then the rotor arm to discover that a forked spring or lever activated by the back and forward movement of the rotor isn't connecting properly with a gear wheel - and this is the gear wheel which helps to turn the ratchet wheel, etc... The gear wheel is incredibly worn and not responding to the action of the lever. You can see the offending spring on either side of the worn gear in the close-up below.

 

To replace or not to replace? The answer, for me, is no. I'll keep the movement for spares as the balance is in good order.

 

Seiko%205%20problem.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will, in order to replace the broken part the whole train wheel bridge needs to be removed I regret.

 

It is secured to the driving wheel with a little circlip which is under the train wheel bridge.

 

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries - I've just sniped a nice Seiko 5 on eBay for a tenner! It's in GWO except for a broken crystal and missing hands. All this happened 25 years ago and it's been lying in a drawer wrapped in a cloth since then.

 

So. I can decide how I want to play this. My guess is I'll take the hands (they match) from the first one and refurbish the one I've just sniped - and I have another one in the offing on eBay...

 

It'll end up being a Seiko FrankenFive!

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries Will...Just find a good Wheel on eBay ( the rotor and his train Wheel ) and you will restart your Seiko 5... a good friend here had a movement for mine ( 6119C ) My movement was missing all the automatic train Wheel and the smal spring that retain the ratchet Wheel, now my Watch works very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...