Jump to content

Is this safe to use?


Recommended Posts

I didn't really see a forum to post issues/questions relating to demagnatizers, so I am posting here.

Any EE's here?  I bought a vintage demagnetizer and just received it.  There was an oily substance on it, which seemed strange.  So, I opened it up.  Oily stuff all over the inside cover and components.  Leaking out of the capacitors?  Not sure if this thing is safe to use or I should try to return it.

20231221_172007.thumb.jpg.86f0f82404640199f7425f83f0c3e9e9.jpg

20231221_172140.thumb.jpg.9eb5043ebc0f6adb73d4758a24059174.jpg

20231221_172144.thumb.jpg.822a96b3ecb764cef8c6e70c5568bc9c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the problem with buying vintage electronics. Unless you know how to repair and refurbish electronic equipment or are willing to spend money getting someone to repair and certify it safe, stay away from vintage electronics. 

Those look like film capacitors and are unlikely to leak anything. It actually looks like paper/foil capacitors. Some of them were coated with a varnish to insulate and prevent oxidation of the metal foil. The varnish could have deteriorated into that oily stuff.

Could you get some closeup photos of the markings on all the capacitors? That would help us identify what kind of capacitors they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

That's the problem with buying vintage electronics. Unless you know how to repair and refurbish electronic equipment or are willing to spend money getting someone to repair and certify it safe, stay away from vintage electronics. 

Those look like film capacitors and are unlikely to leak anything. It actually looks like paper/foil capacitors. Some of them were coated with a varnish to insulate and prevent oxidation of the metal foil. The varnish could have deteriorated into that oily stuff.

Could you get some closeup photos of the markings on all the capacitors? That would help us identify what kind of capacitors they are.

Well, I was imagining simpler electronics.  I've worked on various electronics projects before, but am not familiar with these capacitors.  One of them looks perfectly fine, but the other 3 look oily/waxy.

20231221_192117.jpg

20231221_192152.jpg

20231221_192205.jpg

20231221_192259.jpg

20231221_192232.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of your mylar and paper capacitors are probably okay it's this one that I would be concerned about

image.png.4abb3562aaddd5d3e34490ad9237a84a.png

Especially since something has leaked out from somewhere unless it had leaked in from the top through the cracks in the case leaked from somewhere it's probably This is this looks like electrolytic capacitor. This should be markings on it some place just not visible in the photograph

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

oil type, which is the best kind of capacitor in my opinion

We won't know until we get the numbers but something leaked and all the other capacitors shouldn't have anything resembling a fluid.

 

3 hours ago, gpraceman said:

The big silver cylinder, if that is what you mean, doesn't have any signs of leakage.

Interesting I need to improve my reading skills it doesn't look like this leaked? So if this didn't leak what exactly was leaking?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

All of your mylar and paper capacitors are probably okay it's this one that I would be concerned about

image.png.4abb3562aaddd5d3e34490ad9237a84a.png

Especially since something has leaked out from somewhere unless it had leaked in from the top through the cracks in the case leaked from somewhere it's probably This is this looks like electrolytic capacitor. This should be markings on it some place just not visible in the photograph

I'm not seeing any signs of leakage from that.  Here's some photos of it.

20231222_000727.jpg

20231222_000805.jpg

3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

We won't know until we get the numbers but something leaked and all the other capacitors shouldn't have anything resembling a fluid.

 

Interesting I need to improve my reading skills it doesn't look like this leaked? So if this didn't leak what exactly was leaking?

 

I am only seeing the oilyness on the 4 paper capacitors.  There's the smaller one that doesn't show that oilyness at all.

20231221_212029.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It reminds me of in one of the newer demagnetizer they're using a motor starting capacitor in the case of the one that I was looking at it is a solid capacitor but yours is probably filled with something. But it still brings up what exactly was leaking? Is there anything lurking underneath the circuit board or the whatever board that is?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

It reminds me of in one of the newer demagnetizer they're using a motor starting capacitor in the case of the one that I was looking at it is a solid capacitor but yours is probably filled with something. But it still brings up what exactly was leaking? Is there anything lurking underneath the circuit board or the whatever board that is?

Here's some side views.  Nothing else seems to have that oily substance on it except for a spot on the board.

20231222_001703.jpg

20231222_001714.jpg

20231222_001721.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Maybe what leaked came down from the top is in a box with other stuff and something gets spilled on it? Out of curiosity if you plug it in preferably when it's back in its case and push the button that what happens?

I did a quick operational test of it (in the case) with the cover screws placed in the white zone.  It caused the screws to jump due to the magnetic field pulse and the light flashed briefly.  That is all as should be expected.

There was only a bit of the oily stuff on the outside of the case and lots in the bottom of the case.  It rather seems that the stuff leaked out of the case (not into the case) as it tumbled around during shipping.

s-l1600b.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The silver Aerovox capacitor is not electrolytic most likely. Otherwise we wouldn‘t have two leads of the same color soldered on. So it should be safe.

IMG_5531.jpeg.3760b4cc2b467e89f4c1ee1d2d966638.jpeg

 

EDIT:

The Aerovox 610 is an oil filled metallized polypropylene film capacitor as @HectorLooi mentioned already.

This is how this kind of demagnetizer works:

https://sound-au.com/clocks/demagnetiser.html

Edited by Kalanag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Kalanag said:

 

OK. I have restored several of the newer ones. I am certain they are all the same, essentially. I remove the caps, diodes, and resistors and toss them. The only thing I keep is the coil and the switch. I replaced the circuit completely with new components. If you search this forum, you will see the results of my work.

16 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

OK. I have restored several of the newer ones. I am certain they are all the same, essentially. I remove the caps, diodes, and resistors and toss them. The only thing I keep is the coil and the switch. I replaced the circuit completely with new components. If you search this forum, you will see the results of my work.

 

I add a switch in mine because the 4uF cap is rated at 370V and the voltage multiplier puts continuous stress on it. You have to turn it on, wait about 10 seconds, then hit the demag button.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

@gpraceman I do this kind of stuff with fair frequency. My Fluke can measure capacitance. Let's get together, poke it a bit, make up a parts order with Digikey/Mouser, and we can bang that out in a hurry once the parts arrive. 

Sounds like a plan.  I'm not worried about measuring the current parts.  I'm inclined to just replace them with new more reliable components.  I've been reading that the paper variety capacitors are unreliable and should be replaced.  https://antiqueradio.org/recap.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gpraceman said:

Sounds like a plan.  I'm not worried about measuring the current parts.  I'm inclined to just replace them with new more reliable components.  I've been reading that the paper variety capacitors are unreliable and should be replaced.  https://antiqueradio.org/recap.htm

I am happy to share my PCB layout if you want to replicate what I did. The  4 uF cap is labeled In my pictures. You can find it on the Internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

You mean schematic? Yes. That one has only a single coil, best I can tell.

https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/electronic-demagnetizer-repair.152142/

Thanks for the link.

15 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

OK. I have restored several of the newer ones. I am certain they are all the same, essentially. I remove the caps, diodes, and resistors and toss them. The only thing I keep is the coil and the switch. I replaced the circuit completely with new components. If you search this forum, you will see the results of my work.

I pulled off the top panel to see if there was any components hiding in there.  I don't see any diodes.  I see one large resistor and a couple of selenium rectifiers.  Any real reason to replace those?

I would think that there should be a fuse in there.

A power LED would be nice, but that would take away from the original look.

The switch sticks in the pressed position.  I'll see if I can get that working better or it'll end up on the replacement list.

 

20231222_183327.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've also heard it called the "top side" and the dial side the "bottom side", which should make any non-repairer very confused. There are many examples and sometimes it comes down to personal preference. Personally, I like to say "dial train" whereas most other people would use the term "motion works".
    • Is magnetism such a major problem that we (as home hobbyists) need to spend $$$ on a fancy demagnetiser? I use one of the cheap blue Chinese demagnetisers (£10 from ebay). It works, and has never failed to demagnetise a movement, or my screwdrivers. Magnetometer - who needs one?  Take a very small screw. If it sticks to the clean part, it is magnetised 🤣
    • My overall preference is to use traditional names and terms, that became my habit when i was taught joinery by old boy chippies 2 generations older than me , that had their time in the 40's. But what i often do is adjust the names and terms i use according to who I'm talking with. Sometimes i will say trainside and occasionally watchmaker's side. I try to find a balance between accommodating other folk ( there's no point speaking a foreign language to someone who doesn't understand it ) and using a name that appears to me to be more relevant as to its use or description. But using the name lever can be quite confusing,  some watches might have parts that are also levers, release levers, which in effect is what the pallet fork is, an escapement release lever. 
    • Then put the case number in here https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/search-seiko-case-parts and it should give you the crown 
    • I come across to replace the crystal of a 7734 chronograph.  What make it special there a printed chapter ring  which fits inside the recess of crystal before inserting into the case. I am thinking of a high dome crystal such as Sternkreuz ATCH, fitting diameter OD332/ID320.  For this purpose, tension ring will be removed and fit in the chapter ring.  I understand the crystal size may not perfectly fit these two dimension.  Should aim to find the right ID, then OD can be grinded to reduce without much difficulty.  To find the right crystal, the easiest way is to get know of the OD/ID relationship of Sternkreuz ATCH/ATCG (otherwise the OD of the crystal and tension ring).  I hope you are able to help to minimize the trial and errors.
×
×
  • Create New...