Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I need help identifying this movement. Pictures below.

It was my dad's watch with the brand name VARIX Suisse.

The only markings i can find are on the barrel bridge - "101" and 2 markings on the mainplate - "BRCVCT + DEP." and "164".

I googled and looked at a couple of online movement catalogs to no avail.

Thank you for your help!

Steve

7403BABC-1B76-4403-A783-BB5587377E6A_1_105_c.jpeg

D60409B1-C319-4D06-BD98-E704CBA8C84B_1_105_c.jpeg

9E7880CA-600B-48C8-BB69-FD3B8D4E1F85_1_105_c.jpeg

33AD1309-2D01-428B-A056-307419B77248_1_105_c.jpeg

A659D72F-BA21-49CC-ABF5-80CCABF86BFB_1_105_c.jpeg

Posted

I don't suppose we can get a diameter? With a diameter in ligne  as that's how we measure watches or in metric I've attached a PDF see you can convert it. The reason for this is material books printed from the venture when it started exactly the 50s through the mid 70's perhaps during that time range material books what have what's called the fingerprint system. So you look in your book and if you know the size I just gave you a sample below to see what it looks like. But with the size and a clear picture the setting parts you did attempt to figure out what your watches. Without a size that I have to guess and that takes way more time which I'm not going to. So a nice picture of the setting parts and the size of the watch I can look at my book and see what it is.

 

image.thumb.png.704e2eeeabb4a8164907edd20cfd6577.png

watch-ligne-size-chart.pdf

  • Like 2
Posted

@RichardHarris123 Thank you! - Actuallly, it's not "BREVET" but "BRCVCT" when you look under a microscope. Unless it's a stylized "E" but the "E" on the second word "DEP" portion is clearly an "E". Either way, i couldn't find anything.

@Marc - the diameter is 26.66 mm (11.8 ligne) or if i round off by the chart @JohnR725 posted, 11 3/4 ligne.

@JohnR725 - Thanks for the chart!!!

I wonder if the "plus sign" in the first picture below is associated with a movement maker?

3D1351C1-FFD0-4F35-AC09-FB7CA8C0759A_1_105_c.jpeg

79DCDFBB-2007-4E62-A589-94F06E22FC04.jpeg

A9A91A42-0691-4761-AB78-76AA21DA0A76_1_105_c.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, signcarver said:

Actuallly, it's not "BREVET" but "BRCVCT

Actually your incorrect I snipped something of a website that had to do with hallmarks of markings of watches this will explain

image.thumb.png.ba317b0b13ce70b5f3369b6f6faaa48f.png

 

image.png

  • Like 2
Posted

@JohnR725 Thank you! Mystery of BREVET + DEP solved. 

An interesting tidbit, but unrelated to this post, is that on the inside of the caseback there are the letters "ACIER INOX". I originally thought it might be the case manufacturer, but it's actually French for Stainless Steel. Who knew...

C7C8B468-BF06-4137-83C5-2C3E41E1A3CD_1_105_c.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Marc said:

@Nucejoe check setting works and orientation of balance cock...

Ya , I wasn't anything close.🙃

 I think its a copy though,  theres no trade mark , no caliber designation, hand engraved, E looks C , B looks more like D or O. 6

But copy of what.

Rgds

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Posted

The watch world is littered with examples of ebouche's that have been supplied by one company to be built into watches made by a different company who modify or refinish it to their own requirements (ebouche literally means rough or unfinished), even removing the original manufacturers branding, if it was even there in the first place (it could well be a contract requirement that the ebouche's are supplied un-branded). Such modifications could be technical improvements to the movement, or could just be cosmetic, including changing the shape of the bridges.

I very much doubt this is a "copy" of anything, but is an AS1194 supplied un-branded to the client company for them to  finish as their own. AS might even have carried out the modifications themselves to the client's specification.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Thank you all!

@Marc - Thank you! I will look at the Bestfit Enclyclopedia for the RoAmer MST 372. By the way, nice web site.

@JohnR725 - Thank you! The picture in the link you sent looks very similar, but the train of wheels bridge is a slightly different shape. I'm going to compare parts of my watch with the Bestfit Encyclopedia.

@Nucejoe - Thank you!

@RichardHarris123 - Thank you! Unfortunately no trademarks or caliber number.

I will report back.

Edited by signcarver
corrected links to responders
Posted
4 hours ago, Marc said:

The watch world is littered with examples of ebouche's that have been supplied by one company to be built into watches made by a different company who modify or refinish it to their own requirements (ebouche literally means rough or unfinished), even removing the original manufacturers branding, if it was even there in the first place (it could well be a contract requirement that the ebouche's are supplied un-branded). Such modifications could be technical improvements to the movement, or could just be cosmetic, including changing the shape of the bridges.

I very much doubt this is a "copy" of anything, but is an AS1194 supplied un-branded to the client company for them to  finish as their own. AS might even have carried out the modifications themselves to the client's specification.

People collecting or repairing watches often are very confused by who made their movement. I was a lecture where somebody was giving the history of the Gruen Watch company and there is something quite fascinating. The collectors for being fascinated with who actually made the Gruen movements. What I was fascinated with is the company who made the movements who else were they making movements for who else needed high grade movements? Then some of the key players like their OEM company so much they purchased stock in the company with one of them finally purchasing the company as their own in 2004. You can see the sales price at the link below and you probably be surprised with who the company is you probably thought they made their own movements. Well they do now comes the own the company.

The other thing of interest in the lecture was for OEM type movements when you have several high-end companies purchasing to make their movement look different they change the plate layouts and took out a patent. They still have people having the same movement but the plates will be laid out differently. This is why in the Gruen lecture he said there's still trying to figure out who made some of the movements and then be comparing with other companies to see if they could figure it out similarities and things.

https://www.watch-wiki.net/doku.php?id=aegler

2 hours ago, signcarver said:

Thank you! The picture in the link you sent looks very similar, but the train of wheels bridge is a slightly different shape. I'm going to compare parts of my watch with the Bestfit Encyclopedia.

 

So back to the problem of your watch identifying it? So yes the identification seems simple look at setting parts if they agree we have a number or do we? Why did companies like bestfit come into existence? So for instance we've identified the set bridge a key component in identification of your watch but have we identified the watch yet?

Let's look at the top of the bestfit book noticed what it says gives you the caliber number the size the page where we can find the setting parts the part numbers and movement interchangeability?

image.png.fc069c66ad8a39faa34aeaf86943a779.png

 

Let's go to the bottom of the page and we see that the 1194 as a base caliber of 1158. Notice in a few other movement still use the same base caliber?

image.png.21549099ce60964b450cd3d09e15db81.png

Now back to why do companies like bestfit exist? Even in this example we see in that a lot of parts will interchange and then we end up with a lot of other companies conceivably purchasing the movement putting their own name on it some companies like Bulova would possibly sell their own parts and soon you can end up with hundreds of parts packets considerably all containing the exact same part. Or maybe the company doesn't even have parts than you don't get that many parts at all. But then companies like bestfit come along they help you to identify your watch they give you part numbers and then you can hopefully purchase parts. Or maybe you do something a little different digital bestfit is online at makes it a lot easier to do things like this

for instance that unique set bridge that identifies your watch I wonder who else is using that set bridge? 

 

 

image.png.f8251245529a6d4b74e1908a476d0326.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

@JohnR725 Fascinating information! I had read that the original Rolex Daytona movements were outsourced, but had no idea other movements were. 

I haven't worked on that many watches, so i like to identify the movement in case i break something while servicing it. 

Thanks again for helping me in this journey.

Posted
2 hours ago, signcarver said:

I haven't worked on that many watches, so i like to identify the movement in case i break something while servicing it

Spare parts unfortunately will always be a problem for one reason or another. Even if you 100% identify watch especially of its vintage there may be no spare parts available anymore. r have a mystery watch and try to find another one on eBay Howdy describe your mystery watch to see if anyone is selling another mystery watch that you can purchase for spare parts that becomes quite a challenge.

Then since we believe we have identified the base caliber what about seeing if it actually matches the base caliber parts? You can look in the bestfit book because they do the same thing as the website. Such as this website

https://www.windingstems.com/product.php

Normally you using it if you want a stem or their other part the staff the other thing I use it for its a quick way to get dimensions where you don't have to look in the bestfit book which does list both of these by dimensions in addition to caliber numbers.

So you know or think you have a caliber number you can look up your stem get the sizes and see how closely your stem matches.

Then the setting parts of the peculiar thing where their unique for identification purposes to the company's get together and decide on that or did it just happened because of? But you start going beyond the unique parts how many parts will interchange in a watch with anything else? For instance the stem look at all the watches that use the same stem and I classic we have a variation but not much of a variation

image.png.810b3eded27699514c852befdfb789d0.png

Now we get the dimensions and yes a lot of watches use that particular stem

image.png.d34b0fb1fc1769ee820b6daf7d38b9e6.png

Now let's go to a different website in addition to bestfit online which you have to pay for is another free site.  Which for the most part has exactly everything the same but not always and if you find a part here you can go to the main site and see if it's available for purchase sometimes it is

http://cgi.julesborel.com/

Oh now we get to another problem certain movements set up and made over time will have variations. So depending upon the parts you need you need to be aware of exactly what you need. For instance balance complete there are four of them. Or the cannon pinion they came in different heights looks like six of those. The escape wheel is interesting because it comes in four separate types and the references to the type of pivot it has what is a conical or straight pivots. So all the various combinations are here so if you order and escape wheel you have to get the right one or it won't fit.

Then one of my favorite parts the pallet arbor. Yes when you break the pivot off the arbor can be replaced providing you have the right tools to push it out and push it back in again and put it exactly where it was before. Pallet arbors are interesting because look at how many use the exact same one. So there are some parts that interchange with almost everything in the universe and then other parts that are unique to your watch. More than likely what we're seeing is depending upon who is manufacturing the movement conceivably they outsourced parts like the pallet arbor which was made by somebody else. You go down the list far enough that even looks like a couple of Rolex watches use the same arbor.

So not only do you have companies manufacturing OEM movements conceivably you have them purchasing OEM components from other companies. This would definitely apply to a lot of the specialty things like the jewels or the mainspring or apparently pallet fork arbors.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=[^}D_Es

 

 

 

Four of them are listed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, signcarver said:

By the way, nice web site.

Cheers, I ought to try and get around to updating it 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, signcarver said:

caseback only has limited into which appears to be a serial number, which didn't  pan out. (picture of case back below)

You're not going to find anything on your case back as the database won't have anything. In order to use the case back search you have to have a watch that you actually know who manufactured at it has to company that had parts listed for their cases like Seiko Rolex Omega and others yours does not fall under that category

I snipped out an image for you notice I circled something that's where you want to go click on one of those links see where that takes you

image.thumb.png.679eec75392321a53cbc76e806d9606a.png

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...