Jump to content

Timegrapher Says, +/- 8S/d. Real Life Shows Fast By20 Secs/min


Legarm

Recommended Posts

Serviced ETA 2871, put on timegrapher and the Timegrapher says, +/- 8s/d. Real life shows fast by 20 secs/min.

Could the mainspring be wrong? didn't renew it on servicing as all looked good.

Any ideas chaps & Ladies.........

Keith

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serviced ETA 2871, put on timegrapher and the Timegrapher says, +/- 8s/d. Real life shows fast by 20 secs/min.

Could the mainspring be wrong? didn't renew it on servicing as all looked good.

Any ideas chaps & Ladies.........

Keith

Tested in different angles ? Upside down ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Keith, have you tried checking your timegrapher against a watch that you know keeps good time? If not, it might be worth doing just in case it has developed a fault. It certainly is an odd result you are getting and I know you would have checked all the usual possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say real life, do you mean real life while wearing it?  or if you set it on the desk face up and 'don't touch it' for an hour is it 20 seconds a minute fast?

I had one that I thought had a similiar issue but it turned out to be a loose cannon pinion and the minute hand was moving around making me think it was running fast and of course the timeographer was showing normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The timegrapher listens to the escapement and it sounds like this is doing exactly what it should.

Is it possiblie to mix up the train wheels on this movement to get the wrong ratios?

S

 

Hmmmmm...... no, mix the train wheels and it won,t budge as the pinion leaves would be in oposition on at least one wheel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the escapement is slipping. You can get this fault with clocks all looks great but it slips now and again and whizzes on a bit then functions normal again for a while. The cause in clocks is normally is a very badly worn escapement. 

Have you checked this area on the watch is it functioning correctly. The only other thing I can think of is the minute hand is loose & is slipping  around the minute wheel post or a loose cannon pinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say real life, do you mean real life while wearing it?  or if you set it on the desk face up and 'don't touch it' for an hour is it 20 seconds a minute fast?

I had one that I thought had a similiar issue but it turned out to be a loose cannon pinion and the minute hand was moving around making me think it was running fast and of course the timeographer was showing normal.

 

The cannon pinion on the 2871 is drived by a Driving wheel, perhaps this has come loose from the wheel. I shall check when I've had me Brekky............... Keith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the escapement is slipping. You can get this fault with clocks all looks great but it slips now and again and whizzes on a bit then functions normal again for a while. The cause in clocks is normally is a very badly worn escapement. 

Have you checked this area on the watch is it functioning correctly. The only other thing I can think of is the minute hand is loose & is slipping  around the minute wheel post or a loose cannon pinion.

 

Does function normally at all. I am going to check the cannon driving wheel..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checked the pinion and it is as it should be.

Sent from my XT1021 using Tapatalk

This has me & others totally baffled. If the hands are not slipping & the cannon pinion is good then it is a total mystery as the timegrapher is showing no errors with the main train. Is the cannon pinion riding up or is the dial washer missing.

Have you tested the watch on the timegrapher fully assembled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you replace any parts on the service and did you check what frequency the timegrapher showed? Was the watch working before you serviced it?

This calibre can be converted from 3hz to 4hz by swapping the balance, escape wheel and sweep second wheel. Yours should show 21600 on the timegrapher rather than 28800...

If you leave the watch on the timegrapher for one minute, does it gain there or only when being worn?

S

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you replace any parts on the service and did you check what frequency the timegrapher showed? Was the watch working before you serviced it?

This calibre can be converted from 3hz to 4hz by swapping the balance, escape wheel and sweep second wheel. Yours should show 21600 on the timegrapher rather than 28800...

If you leave the watch on the timegrapher for one minute, does it gain there or only when being worn?

S

Just my thought? But couldn't confirm it . Could it be a mix of parts between the two different movements . Think  if you have the wrong balance? 

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has me & others totally baffled. If the hands are not slipping & the cannon pinion is good then it is a total mystery as the timegrapher is showing no errors with the main train. Is the cannon pinion riding up or is the dial washer missing.

Have you tested the watch on the timegrapher fully assembled.

 

Tested fully assembled and Mvt only. It's a really nice condition West End Military. So really want to get it correct. Can't have the Army turning up too early....

 

Did you replace any parts on the service and did you check what frequency the timegrapher showed? Was the watch working before you serviced it?

This calibre can be converted from 3hz to 4hz by swapping the balance, escape wheel and sweep second wheel. Yours should show 21600 on the timegrapher rather than 28800...

If you leave the watch on the timegrapher for one minute, does it gain there or only when being worn?

S

 

Not changed any parts. Was running fast when I got it. All I can think of is the Mainspring has been replaced in the past and over-powered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested fully assembled and Mvt only. It's a really nice condition West End Military. So really want to get it correct. Can't have the Army turning up too early....

 

 

Not changed any parts. Was running fast when I got it. All I can think of is the Mainspring has been replaced in the past and over-powered. 

If it is the mainspring then I would have thought it would run fast all of the time also I have read if a spring is fitted that is too strong you get a issue called over banking and you would not get nice reading on the timegrapher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is the mainspring then I would have thought it would run fast all of the time also I have read if a spring is fitted that is too strong you get a issue called over banking and you would not get nice reading on the timegrapher.

 

it does run fast all the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...