Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I finally got round to restoring an ET/NFT (Eberle) 38 in a Waltham wrist watch which I've had for years.

I had to fit a new balance staff, and the hairspring took some re-shaping - the terminal curve was all wrong (suggesting it might be the wrong hairspring).

I fitted a new mainspring 1.8 x 0.10 x 280 (as listed by Ranfft and BestFit).

I thought I might be chasing amplitude, but it turns out I have too much. It runs fine until it starts re-banking. I've oiled the pallet pivot jewels, but that didn't help.

I can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

Does anyone know roughly how much a drop of 0.01 in strength will change the amplitude ? 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

I'm curious about your thinking here as to why you think this may be the problem?

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

balance staff

When you fit the new balance staff did you polish the pivots?

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

It runs fine until it starts re-banking. I've oiled the pallet pivot jewels, but that didn't help.

I've also seen recommendations of using HP 1300 on the balance pivots. I suppose you could try heavier oil on the pallet fork pivots but they can be better to figure out what the problem is.

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm curious about your thinking here as to why you think this may be the problem?

The terminal curve was the wrong shape - there barely was one.

4 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

When you fit the new balance staff did you polish the pivots?

No

4 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I've also seen recommendations of using HP 1300 on the balance pivots. I suppose you could try heavier oil on the pallet fork pivots but they can be better to figure out what the problem is.

I tried HP1300 on both pallet pivots - didn't have a big effect.

I cannot find the lift angle for this movement. From what I can determine it's about 43°. Even with this setting it's reaching well over 300° before (what I think is) re-banking occurs. It's obvious on a pocket watch as you can clearly hear the "galloping". But it's not so easy to hear on a smallish movement.

The hairspring was covered in some goo, not sure what - so I did think it was coils sticking. I put it through the cleaning process twice, but it still didn't look spotless. Today I gave it a clean in the ultrasonic in acetone, then naphtha, then IPA. It looks a lot better now.  I'll see how it goes tomorrow.

I'm struggling to get good slow motion of the balance, to determine the lift angle, and see if any coils are sticking. My phone (Samsung A50) won't allow me to zoom when recording slo-mo. I can record through the microscope camera, then play back using VLC Video Player. But even at the slowest speed x0.25, it's hard to see what's going on.  Anyone got a better method?

Posted (edited)

I got the hairspring super clean and all coils nicely spaced.

I put a mark on the balance with tippex tape and determined lift angle is about 43°.

It started running nicely, steady plot, finally got beat error close to 0ms, amplitude  280°, 290° , 300­° - then re-banking  ahhhhhhh 💩💩💩

It's definitely re-banking as I can hear the galloping.

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

I can't understand it - I'm going to give up on this one and put it back on the shelf 😟

 

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
26 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I got the hairspring super clean and all coils nicely spaced.

I put a mark on the balance with tippex tape and determined lift angle is about 43°.

It started running nicely, steady plot, finally got beat error close to 0ms, amplitude  280°, 290° , 300­° - then re-banking  ahhhhhhh 💩💩💩

It's definitely re-banking as I can hear the galloping.

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

I can't understand it - I'm going to give up on this one and put it back on the shelf 😟

 

With this potentially being a 70 odd year old movement, was the spring you removed of an equivalent material to today's bought ones. So could same size but a higher tensile strength be the cause ?

Posted
30 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

was the spring you removed of an equivalent material to today's bought ones. So could same size but a higher tensile strength be the cause ?

The modern white mainsprings as they're called are supposed to be stronger for the same thickness as an original blued steel spring.

On 10/5/2023 at 7:15 AM, mikepilk said:

new balance staff,

What would be interesting is if we had proper timing machine diagnostics. Like does this occur in dial down only what does the watch do in dial up and what happens if it's crown down? How do things look of its only wound 50% so it's not giving you a problem so we can see if there is a problem with maybe the pivots better perhaps?

It's assumed that the new balance staff is perfect. Unfortunately my experiences been that sometimes are not perfect there's the possibility at one end may be different than the other end or maybe they're just not shaped right at all. For instance images of how the pivot is supposed to be shaped it's actually supposed to be a little flat on the end because if it's not you end up with exactly the problem you're having. I did this in school when I was shaping the end of the pivot I made it nice and round and the timing machine made a really nice galloping sound.

image.png.33430aa016f6cf479f1c62e195ac1cb0.png

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

Did you give up on the idea of going to weaker mainspring to see what would happen?

Posted (edited)
On 10/5/2023 at 5:45 PM, mikepilk said:

I  can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

 If this was to be the case,  then hairspring must be noticably longer than original to produce the right frequency. 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Posted
33 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 If this was to be the case,  then hairspring must be noticably longer than original to produce the right frequency. 

 

Help me to understand your thinking here Joe.  Are you saying a longer ( effectively weaker ) hs would add to the degree of rotation of the balance. I can understand as it has less strength to pull it back, but is also going to slow down the timing. 

Posted (edited)

It re-banks DU and DD. Vertical is OK as the amplitude drops enough. At less than full wind, the performance is good.

It's had an interesting history, as both balance hole jewels were just plain flat jewels 🥴

Edited by mikepilk
Posted

Did we ever get a picture of the movement so we can see what were talking about?

On 10/5/2023 at 7:15 AM, mikepilk said:

I fitted a new mainspring 1.8 x 0.10 x 280 (as listed by Ranfft and BestFit).

Thinking about factory specified mainsprings. When the Elgin watch company was in business they used to have factory tours and of course in some supervisor's office there would be a book. The book that specifies everything which unfortunately has no pictures which is very sad still a book explaining what's to be shown all the details etc. I snipped out an image of the book for you something that was wondered about and maybe your watch has the same problem? We can see and I highlighted as one of the watches too much amplitude what do they do well it goes someplace where they swap it for a weaker barrel. They don't specify here but for some of their watches and the older material book they actually have weaker mainsprings. Here they just swap for a weaker barrel. I wonder if they leave a little note to stick a Post-it note the watch that they did this? What would happen in the future if you were servicing the watch a use the Factory specified mainspring?

image.png.e942ae6addb6c3b50836df013ba3b874.png

Oh and what about something that were here we can blame it's a vintage watch using a blued steel spring there could be a lot of variation but what about newer watches like Rolex what about a 3135 it's a very common Rolex. How many mainsprings does it have an notice how one of them is what

image.png.f8530ee1fd6688d39f346b120acf2efa.png

Posted
3 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 Are you saying a longer ( effectively weaker ) hs would add to the degree of rotation of the balance. 

Correct,   Longer HS  adds to the degree of rotation, be it of the same CGS No or weaker.

What I am saying is;   in adition to the terminal curve suggesting wrong hairspring, the length of hairspring thus radius of the coil could suggest wrong hairspring. 

Providing long enough, any hairspring on a balance wheel can produce the desired frequency, one limiting factor in matching balance-hairspring is diameter of the coil. 

Smart of Mike to interpret his observance of the unshapely terminal curve/ coil  as possible wrong hairspring.

I would try the old or a weaker new mainspring.

Rgds

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

That's an interesting read @JohnR725

The question is John and @Nucejoe, is the weaker spring .01 or .02 weaker in thickness?

 

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Did we ever get a picture of the movement so we can see what were talking about?

 

9.thumb.jpg.bc778fbb559d16019d27b5fa57ab8dab.jpg

20160817_173115.thumb.jpg.2cccd0661169c0f0ece528aaf7ef8d05.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
7 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

When the Elgin watch company was in business they used to have factory tours and of course in some supervisor's office there would be a book. The book that specifies everything which unfortunately has no pictures which is very sad still a book explaining what's to be shown all the details etc. I snipped out an image of the book

I'm trying to understand if the book that specifies everything in some supervisor's office somehow went walkies during a factory tour that was attended by a guy called John . Considering that said John is now able to snip images from said book 😄.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm trying to understand if the book that specifies everything in some supervisor's office somehow went walkies during a factory tour that was attended by a guy called John . Considering that said John is now able to snip images from said book

I would've loved to visit the factory but never did. I obtain the book from somebody who used to visit Elgin Illinois and purchase things from former factory workers. As expected from a factory internal document no copyright date but based on the history part of the factory it probably came into existence about 1955.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I would've loved to visit the factory but never did. I obtain the book from somebody who used to visit Elgin Illinois and purchase things from former factory workers. As expected from a factory internal document no copyright date but based on the history part of the factory it probably came into existence about 1955.

 

 

Praise to former watch factory workers with incentive to aquire things with interesting information that might have otherwise been lost forever. 

Posted
18 hours ago, mikepilk said:

is the weaker spring .01 or .02 weaker in thickness?

Answering my own question :

I've just completed service/repair on a Movado 150MN which was re-banking.
(Odd that the two watches I'm currently working on have the same problem!).

The mainspring measured 1.30 x 0.11, which is incorrect. When fitted with the correct 1.30 x 0.10, the amplitude is about 270°.

So a reduction in thickness of 0.01 was enough to fix it.

[ I remember reading that wound springs can be considered as rectangular beams in bending, with moment of Inertia bd³/12
i.e. it depends on thickness cubed. So (0.10/0.11)³ = 0.75. So a reduction in strength of 25% - quite a lot ]

 

10.thumb.jpg.317aaf56b43758940d88362f99c22be0.jpg

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...