Jump to content

How much weaker mainspring should I get to stop re-banking?


Recommended Posts

I finally got round to restoring an ET/NFT (Eberle) 38 in a Waltham wrist watch which I've had for years.

I had to fit a new balance staff, and the hairspring took some re-shaping - the terminal curve was all wrong (suggesting it might be the wrong hairspring).

I fitted a new mainspring 1.8 x 0.10 x 280 (as listed by Ranfft and BestFit).

I thought I might be chasing amplitude, but it turns out I have too much. It runs fine until it starts re-banking. I've oiled the pallet pivot jewels, but that didn't help.

I can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

Does anyone know roughly how much a drop of 0.01 in strength will change the amplitude ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

I'm curious about your thinking here as to why you think this may be the problem?

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

balance staff

When you fit the new balance staff did you polish the pivots?

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

It runs fine until it starts re-banking. I've oiled the pallet pivot jewels, but that didn't help.

I've also seen recommendations of using HP 1300 on the balance pivots. I suppose you could try heavier oil on the pallet fork pivots but they can be better to figure out what the problem is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm curious about your thinking here as to why you think this may be the problem?

The terminal curve was the wrong shape - there barely was one.

4 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

When you fit the new balance staff did you polish the pivots?

No

4 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I've also seen recommendations of using HP 1300 on the balance pivots. I suppose you could try heavier oil on the pallet fork pivots but they can be better to figure out what the problem is.

I tried HP1300 on both pallet pivots - didn't have a big effect.

I cannot find the lift angle for this movement. From what I can determine it's about 43°. Even with this setting it's reaching well over 300° before (what I think is) re-banking occurs. It's obvious on a pocket watch as you can clearly hear the "galloping". But it's not so easy to hear on a smallish movement.

The hairspring was covered in some goo, not sure what - so I did think it was coils sticking. I put it through the cleaning process twice, but it still didn't look spotless. Today I gave it a clean in the ultrasonic in acetone, then naphtha, then IPA. It looks a lot better now.  I'll see how it goes tomorrow.

I'm struggling to get good slow motion of the balance, to determine the lift angle, and see if any coils are sticking. My phone (Samsung A50) won't allow me to zoom when recording slo-mo. I can record through the microscope camera, then play back using VLC Video Player. But even at the slowest speed x0.25, it's hard to see what's going on.  Anyone got a better method?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the hairspring super clean and all coils nicely spaced.

I put a mark on the balance with tippex tape and determined lift angle is about 43°.

It started running nicely, steady plot, finally got beat error close to 0ms, amplitude  280°, 290° , 300­° - then re-banking  ahhhhhhh 💩💩💩

It's definitely re-banking as I can hear the galloping.

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

I can't understand it - I'm going to give up on this one and put it back on the shelf 😟

 

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I got the hairspring super clean and all coils nicely spaced.

I put a mark on the balance with tippex tape and determined lift angle is about 43°.

It started running nicely, steady plot, finally got beat error close to 0ms, amplitude  280°, 290° , 300­° - then re-banking  ahhhhhhh 💩💩💩

It's definitely re-banking as I can hear the galloping.

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

I can't understand it - I'm going to give up on this one and put it back on the shelf 😟

 

With this potentially being a 70 odd year old movement, was the spring you removed of an equivalent material to today's bought ones. So could same size but a higher tensile strength be the cause ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

was the spring you removed of an equivalent material to today's bought ones. So could same size but a higher tensile strength be the cause ?

The modern white mainsprings as they're called are supposed to be stronger for the same thickness as an original blued steel spring.

On 10/5/2023 at 7:15 AM, mikepilk said:

new balance staff,

What would be interesting is if we had proper timing machine diagnostics. Like does this occur in dial down only what does the watch do in dial up and what happens if it's crown down? How do things look of its only wound 50% so it's not giving you a problem so we can see if there is a problem with maybe the pivots better perhaps?

It's assumed that the new balance staff is perfect. Unfortunately my experiences been that sometimes are not perfect there's the possibility at one end may be different than the other end or maybe they're just not shaped right at all. For instance images of how the pivot is supposed to be shaped it's actually supposed to be a little flat on the end because if it's not you end up with exactly the problem you're having. I did this in school when I was shaping the end of the pivot I made it nice and round and the timing machine made a really nice galloping sound.

image.png.33430aa016f6cf479f1c62e195ac1cb0.png

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

I measured the mainspring - it's the correct size.

Did you give up on the idea of going to weaker mainspring to see what would happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2023 at 5:45 PM, mikepilk said:

I  can only think that the balance/hairspring may be wrong?

 If this was to be the case,  then hairspring must be noticably longer than original to produce the right frequency. 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 If this was to be the case,  then hairspring must be noticably longer than original to produce the right frequency. 

 

Help me to understand your thinking here Joe.  Are you saying a longer ( effectively weaker ) hs would add to the degree of rotation of the balance. I can understand as it has less strength to pull it back, but is also going to slow down the timing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It re-banks DU and DD. Vertical is OK as the amplitude drops enough. At less than full wind, the performance is good.

It's had an interesting history, as both balance hole jewels were just plain flat jewels 🥴

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did we ever get a picture of the movement so we can see what were talking about?

On 10/5/2023 at 7:15 AM, mikepilk said:

I fitted a new mainspring 1.8 x 0.10 x 280 (as listed by Ranfft and BestFit).

Thinking about factory specified mainsprings. When the Elgin watch company was in business they used to have factory tours and of course in some supervisor's office there would be a book. The book that specifies everything which unfortunately has no pictures which is very sad still a book explaining what's to be shown all the details etc. I snipped out an image of the book for you something that was wondered about and maybe your watch has the same problem? We can see and I highlighted as one of the watches too much amplitude what do they do well it goes someplace where they swap it for a weaker barrel. They don't specify here but for some of their watches and the older material book they actually have weaker mainsprings. Here they just swap for a weaker barrel. I wonder if they leave a little note to stick a Post-it note the watch that they did this? What would happen in the future if you were servicing the watch a use the Factory specified mainspring?

image.png.e942ae6addb6c3b50836df013ba3b874.png

Oh and what about something that were here we can blame it's a vintage watch using a blued steel spring there could be a lot of variation but what about newer watches like Rolex what about a 3135 it's a very common Rolex. How many mainsprings does it have an notice how one of them is what

image.png.f8530ee1fd6688d39f346b120acf2efa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 Are you saying a longer ( effectively weaker ) hs would add to the degree of rotation of the balance. 

Correct,   Longer HS  adds to the degree of rotation, be it of the same CGS No or weaker.

What I am saying is;   in adition to the terminal curve suggesting wrong hairspring, the length of hairspring thus radius of the coil could suggest wrong hairspring. 

Providing long enough, any hairspring on a balance wheel can produce the desired frequency, one limiting factor in matching balance-hairspring is diameter of the coil. 

Smart of Mike to interpret his observance of the unshapely terminal curve/ coil  as possible wrong hairspring.

I would try the old or a weaker new mainspring.

Rgds

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

When the Elgin watch company was in business they used to have factory tours and of course in some supervisor's office there would be a book. The book that specifies everything which unfortunately has no pictures which is very sad still a book explaining what's to be shown all the details etc. I snipped out an image of the book

I'm trying to understand if the book that specifies everything in some supervisor's office somehow went walkies during a factory tour that was attended by a guy called John . Considering that said John is now able to snip images from said book 😄.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm trying to understand if the book that specifies everything in some supervisor's office somehow went walkies during a factory tour that was attended by a guy called John . Considering that said John is now able to snip images from said book

I would've loved to visit the factory but never did. I obtain the book from somebody who used to visit Elgin Illinois and purchase things from former factory workers. As expected from a factory internal document no copyright date but based on the history part of the factory it probably came into existence about 1955.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I would've loved to visit the factory but never did. I obtain the book from somebody who used to visit Elgin Illinois and purchase things from former factory workers. As expected from a factory internal document no copyright date but based on the history part of the factory it probably came into existence about 1955.

 

 

Praise to former watch factory workers with incentive to aquire things with interesting information that might have otherwise been lost forever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, mikepilk said:

is the weaker spring .01 or .02 weaker in thickness?

Answering my own question :

I've just completed service/repair on a Movado 150MN which was re-banking.
(Odd that the two watches I'm currently working on have the same problem!).

The mainspring measured 1.30 x 0.11, which is incorrect. When fitted with the correct 1.30 x 0.10, the amplitude is about 270°.

So a reduction in thickness of 0.01 was enough to fix it.

[ I remember reading that wound springs can be considered as rectangular beams in bending, with moment of Inertia bd³/12
i.e. it depends on thickness cubed. So (0.10/0.11)³ = 0.75. So a reduction in strength of 25% - quite a lot ]

 

10.thumb.jpg.317aaf56b43758940d88362f99c22be0.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angled case the watch the case had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
    • Drilling is going to be difficult, firstly because the drill bits are so thin and brittle, expect to break a few. The second issue is access to the 'hole', as the other lug will be in the way, meaning that you will have to drill at a slight angle, putting a bending stress on the drill bit and with the slightest drop in concentration .... and back to my first point. I would be tempted to grind them flat with a Dremel type tool or small jewelers file, and then put a center punch in the center of the bit to be drilled so the drill bit doesn't skip around and break... but expect this to be slow and frustrating work. By the time you have done 4 of these you'll be an expert and can come back and tell us all the best way to do it if you go down this route. However, I would seriously consider What @watchweasol said and drill from the outside-in, this will ensure straight holes without having to work around the other lugs. It may be worthwhile making yourself a simple paper template so you can be sure to match the position of each hole before drilling. In the end you will be left with 4 holes on the outside of the lugs, but many cases are made this way and unless you are looking for it you probably won't notice or realise that it's not the way the watch was meant to be in the first place.
    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...