Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hamilton Cal 64 movement.  The watch seems to gain time in all positions except PD.  I show a comparison of PU and PD but other positions are very close to PU trace.

The regulator pin wrt the center of the balance is a line more or less parallel to the pendant.  I think that is telling, but telling what?

image.png.f8b1a8199d9cb5e1e12d78dc467ce589.png

image.png.dfc3faea008ae888cbf9ba9b8765cf09.png

image.png.72147e46e15724fd0720f4d5876099d0.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

PU +14  208
PD -31   234
DU +9    230
DD +12   247

I'm assuming the graphical display looks fine for all of these no random dots or things to interfere? What's interesting is his pendant down is actually higher than dial up which is typically not a good thing. It's why the ends of the balance pivots are supposed to be slightly flat because of the round agenda put too much amplitude but typically in the pendant positions you will always drop amplitude and if you end up with a dial position less than a pendant position I'm always suspicious of something isn't right

not that on some of the high grade watches you can sometimes see their amplitudes are really really close spread like they spent a lot of time with balance jewel design and shape of the pivots to do that but still almost always see a bigger drop in the pendant/crown positions and dial up and down

of the other thing is it just leave it in one position and you watch it you see the numbers slowly going up and down or do they stay relatively constant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking at the graphical display again looks like the blue line as a little more irregularities than the other? You might just touch a little more lubrication on the other pallet stone sometimes a pallet stone lubrication issue was show up like this. Sometimes you have stuff like this it also screws up timekeeping. Just depends on how bad it is

so we had up with several things pivots were pivot issues anything related that would affect the pivots like to dial-up and dial down not being the same as an issue.

Poise of the balance although typically on modern balances there pretty closely poised but that will give you a poising air

if you want to get obsessed and looking for other things you should read the manual at the link below I would attach it but it's really big file size was better to give you a link. There are some positions of a watch where the escapement will change things. Conceivably when you have changes you'll have amplitude issues and depending upon the spacing of your regulator pins it will translate into timing issues.

this is where you looking for a poising issue you'd want to drop the amplitude down much lower than things like poising issues become much more dramatic on the other hand escapement issues will also become more dramatic

http://www.historictimekeepers.com/documents/Micromat.pdf

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great manual.  I wonder about the pallet fork.  It seems to have more "shake" in it than I would expect, but it is a totally subjective observation--not enough experience to intuit this. 

I put a dot of oil on the end of each pallet stone.  Will let it run awhile and I will check it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and with the disk hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and it has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 Very happy how this worked for me 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
    • one of the problems we have is visible versus invisible. For instance millennium disulfide another high pressure lubricant black in color. I was told by somebody worked for the Boeing company that they had a piston like device somewhere that has eight call it around it to grab it so it has to slide and in the collet has to grab. But if somebody puts that type of dry grease on where grease with that in it it embeds itself basically in the metal and they have to throw the whole part away they get use it all. So I suspect on all the dry powdery lubricants that they will go into all the basically microscopic cracks and crannies of the metaland that's where it is visually at least until you scrub it off your visually going to see it which is good because you want your lubrication the stay word is. But I'm sure it doesn't last forever on the metal it's just a really nice lubrication  
×
×
  • Create New...