Jump to content

Setting wheel chamfer


Recommended Posts

Advice please. 

Am I correct is assuming that the setting wheel, when it has a chamfer, always has the chamfer edge placed down toward the sliding pinion?  The flat edge always to the top for contact with the plate that usually secures the minute wheel, hour wheel or other part of the keyless works.

Ross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Thats how my common sense says it should be, yet I seen set mech working fine with set wheel installed upside down and no sign of wear. 

I always set them with the chamfer down. Some movements work fine with them either way, but I recently rebuilt an Omega and found the hand setting very stiff and not smooth. I found that I'd put the setting wheel with the chamfer side up - turned it over and all was well.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GuyMontag, I am beginging to doubt my common sense now.

By intution one concludes , the chamfer is there to improve chance of mesh with the clutch. 

You don't believe me    !!!       ask Ross , he knows. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

GuyMontag, I am beginging to doubt my common sense now.

By intution one concludes , the chamfer is there to improve chance of mesh with the clutch. 

You don't believe me    !!!       ask Ross , he knows. 

 

What is odd is that the 11AOACB and the 11ANACB are basically the same movement with quickset date added to the 11AOACB and pretty much everything else interchanges. But the 11ANACB the tech sheet does not call this out for the  setting wheel and every 11ANACB I've worked on had both of the setting wheels with the beveled edge facing down 🤷‍♂️

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the anecdotal evidence, but whenever I have finished a watch and the time setting seems to grind, or has that 'gritty feeling' I have always found that the chamfer is facing up, when changing this things always seem smoother. I have never experienced the opposite so now I always put chamfer down, which aligns with most of the advice on here and many of the watch videos I have seen on line. I suppose there will always be exceptions to this rule, but I would think if you always put it down you will be making the correct call 99% of the time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

The tech sheet for the Bulova 11AOACB calls out that of the two setting wheels, the one that meshes with the sliding pinion goes beveled side UP:


setting-wheel.thumb.jpg.a5259acd2ee6eabd7fb9961c6c9c7282.jpg

There's something else that is unconventional with Bulova's guidelines. Anyone else spotted it?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

The 'hairspring does not move freely .... but leans against the regulator pin'.

I knew that. Well, I do now that you've told me. I was just testing you...... Isn't it funny that something becomes obvious when someone points it out?

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

There's something else that is unconventional with Bulova's guidelines. Anyone else spotted it?

I did see that when I read the tech sheet but I have to admit that I don't follow it. Same with their advice on how to oil the top pivot of the sweep second wheel. which doesn't make sense to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I existed before the term mechatronics engineer existed. I had to combine electricity, electronics, pneumatics, hydraulics and computing just to keep my own equipment working. I have never sub contracted any of my own repairs to the suppliers because I know I could do a better job. For a long time, dental suppliers in my country would bring their dead equipment to me that their own engineers cannot handle. I have accidentally embarrassed a couple of hospital heads of engineering by demonstrating their inadequacy.  I think mechatronics is the most under-appreciated, under valued of all the engineering sciences. I had a part-time dental assistant about 25 years ago, who was studying mechatronics in the polytechnic. She was absolutely clueless about the job prospects for a mechatronics engineer. I asked her about her aspirations and she replied that she really wanted to work in the games industry.  In our dental profession, equipment have evolved from simple mechanical to electro-mechanical to logic-driven electro-mechanical and currently to computer driven machines.  The medical equipment suppliers who employ mechanical engineers and/or mechanical engineers cannot cope with the repairs of the newer equipment. And many times end up changing whole modules and whole machines just because they cannot repair them. But I think HR is afraid to employ a mechatronics engineer just because they don't know what a mechatronics engineer does. Mechatronics is much more fun. It combines almost all of the engineering sciences and produces an all-rounded engineer. But until HR changes their mindset, not all door will be open.
    • Welcome Tarheel, there is a lot of help on this forum...
    • Hello and welcome to the forum.    Enjoy
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • I can't find anything similar either.  All the writing on the case was a form of advertising, stem set, Swiss lever etc usually found on older watches.
×
×
  • Create New...