Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a Patek caliber 28-255 (same as AP 2120 or Vacheron 1120) with a broken jewel in the combined barrel bridge (part 106). I measured the jewel before removing and the hole after removing as well as the part that sits in the jewel. 

The interior hole size needs to be 1.10. 

I measured the existing hole in the bridge at 1.74mm, which would lead me to look for a 1.75mm outside diameter jewel. Ideally, I would get a 110x175 jewel. I suppose I could look for a 110x180 and increase the hole size if required. 

The closest size I found was 110x170 center jewel. Even though I measured several times, I assumed I must have measured wrong and ordered this one. Didn't fit. 

Can anyone help me find a replacement jewel of an odd size like this? 

Worst case, I'll turn a brass bushing or buy a replacement bridge but I'd rather not. 

IMG_5084.thumb.jpg.14809459263c1bdb7d65c33ae80e329d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mzinski said:

I have a Patek caliber 28-255 (same as AP 2120 or Vacheron 1120) with a broken jewel in the combined barrel bridge (part 106). I measured the jewel before removing and the hole after removing as well as the part that sits in the jewel. 

The interior hole size needs to be 1.10. 

I measured the existing hole in the bridge at 1.74mm, which would lead me to look for a 1.75mm outside diameter jewel. Ideally, I would get a 110x175 jewel. I suppose I could look for a 110x180 and increase the hole size if required. 

So a jewel with a 1.10 mm hole, and 0.325 mm wall thickness !  They must be hard to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kind of odd that they went with an exterior size that's not a full 10th of a mm, but they certainly ordered these specifically for this caliber (and it's been around quite some time) so they could spec whatever they wanted. Something to be careful of is the jewel thickness- this is an ultra thin caliber, and the original jewel is probably going to be thinner than anything available as a generic jewel. If you can make a bushing to fit a smaller jewel, and have some beryllium copper bar, I would bet that a nice bushing made from that as a replacement for the jewel will work just fine. Then you can fit it to the original hole, and nothing has been changed on the watch.

 

I'm curious where you found one 1.10/1.70- do you mind sharing the supplier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

It's kind of odd that they went with an exterior size that's not a full 10th of a mm, but they certainly ordered these specifically for this caliber (and it's been around quite some time) so they could spec whatever they wanted. Something to be careful of is the jewel thickness- this is an ultra thin caliber, and the original jewel is probably going to be thinner than anything available as a generic jewel. If you can make a bushing to fit a smaller jewel, and have some beryllium copper bar, I would bet that a nice bushing made from that as a replacement for the jewel will work just fine. Then you can fit it to the original hole, and nothing has been changed on the watch.

 

I'm curious where you found one 1.10/1.70- do you mind sharing the supplier?

Ofrei had some 110x170 center jewels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

It's kind of odd that they went with an exterior size that's not a full 10th of a mm, but they certainly ordered these specifically for this caliber (and it's been around quite some time) so they could spec whatever they wanted. Something to be careful of is the jewel thickness- this is an ultra thin caliber, and the original jewel is probably going to be thinner than anything available as a generic jewel. If you can make a bushing to fit a smaller jewel, and have some beryllium copper bar, I would bet that a nice bushing made from that as a replacement for the jewel will work just fine. Then you can fit it to the original hole, and nothing has been changed on the watch.

 

I'm curious where you found one 1.10/1.70- do you mind sharing the supplier?

If you were to make the whole thing out of copper/brass/etc and forego the jewel all together, what material would you use? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Whats the budget for the correct jewel?  

 

   

 

Good question. Nothing necessarily set but I would like to target $50 +/-

Why? A new (used) bridge off eBay is $250. I don't want the price of a new jewel to get too close to a full replacement cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mzinski said:

Good question. Nothing necessarily set but I would like to target $50 +/-

Why? A new (used) bridge off eBay is $250. I don't want the price of a new jewel to get too close to a full replacement cost. 

This price neccesitates no covert CIA operation.  So I hush up.😷 lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the whole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
×
×
  • Create New...