Jump to content

1956 Bulova President 10BU movement work in progress


Recommended Posts

Just got this lovely little lad. Only just started researching, but thanks to @GuyMontag's suggestion, it appears to be a President. This thread at MyBulova backs that up.

Edit: also this thread at MyBulova that Guy linked, describing the "President P" variant. I haven't been able to find any other pictures or advertisements or mentions of the charcoal dial on the internet, but my Google-fu may not be strong enough.

It came to me fully wound and not running. Found some corrosion by the stem and on the crown wheel, so we'll have to see what's deeper inside.

Giving the balance a little push, it seems to want to run, but it feels gummy. The last Bulova movement I worked on had the lubricant in the jewels turn rock hard, and it felt exactly like this, so I'm hoping a good cleaning and service will fix it.

The face is in pretty rough shape around the diamonds, and I think I spy a fingerprint or two.

20221223_170232.thumb.jpg.8178736ea5065b98776abc436e3efa64.jpg

20221225_000305.thumb.jpg.7019b6b8838200894e9863a9f5f688d5.jpg

20221225_000432.thumb.jpg.58a918ac995645dcc2a3dd6628690294.jpg

20221225_000512.thumb.jpg.0f905c98d74a0d496e99d39fd534b4f1.jpg

20221225_000755.thumb.jpg.c079b9807e010c61c4fcb14d51709396.jpg

20221225_000801.thumb.jpg.f3db46b4cb92c336b9e415b16d614783.jpg

Anyway, I'll keep y'all updated of my progress as I go!

 

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
added link
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Just got this lovely little lad. Only just started researching, but thanks to @GuyMontag's suggestion, it appears to be a President. This thread at MyBulova backs that up.

Edit: also this thread at MyBulova that Guy linked, describing the "President P" variant. I haven't been able to find any other pictures or advertisements or mentions of the charcoal dial on the internet, but my Google-fu may not be strong enough.

It came to me fully wound and not running. Found some corrosion by the stem and on the crown wheel, so we'll have to see what's deeper inside.

Giving the balance a little push, it seems to want to run, but it feels gummy. The last Bulova movement I worked on had the lubricant in the jewels turn rock hard, and it felt exactly like this, so I'm hoping a good cleaning and service will fix it.

The face is in pretty rough shape around the diamonds, and I think I spy a fingerprint or two.

20221223_170232.thumb.jpg.8178736ea5065b98776abc436e3efa64.jpg

20221225_000305.thumb.jpg.7019b6b8838200894e9863a9f5f688d5.jpg

20221225_000432.thumb.jpg.58a918ac995645dcc2a3dd6628690294.jpg

20221225_000512.thumb.jpg.0f905c98d74a0d496e99d39fd534b4f1.jpg

20221225_000755.thumb.jpg.c079b9807e010c61c4fcb14d51709396.jpg

20221225_000801.thumb.jpg.f3db46b4cb92c336b9e415b16d614783.jpg

Anyway, I'll keep y'all updated of my progress as I go!

 

You have an import code there msb, is it axo ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corrosion doesn't seem too extensive. Other than the outer half of the stem, the keyless works look pretty good. There's some on the center wheel arbor, which may need replacing.

Someone scratched "8020" into the back of the dial.

Lots of side shake in the barrel bridge. Going to have to close that hole up. Definitely going to need a mainspring.

Overall though, could be worse. I don't see any cracked jewels or anything alarming. Yet.

 

20221227_223140.jpg

20221227_223147.jpg

20221227_224314.jpg

20221227_230534.jpg

20221227_230605.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Finally got back to work on this one, and boy did it clean up nicely. Only part replaced was the mainspring. It could probably use a new stem, and I lost the little spring on the stem during cleaning, but otherwise just cleaned and lubricated.

I polished the crystal with red rouge, then automotive plastic polish, and the results are nothing short of stunning. Despite the dial being a disaster up close, it really looks great on the wrist.

image.thumb.png.a5f86471bcb60719e08d7482b6d9c5cf.png

20230425_223111.thumb.jpg.e17542d802f8051e0284481e17a2ca61.jpg20230425_223137.thumb.jpg.269ee5df56e226b98d7144140b2e5134.jpg20230425_223126.thumb.jpg.83c6c3d639121977beee1b8010d6495f.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sorry to revive this old thread, but I could use some help.

I noticed today that the movement is loose in the case--when I wind or set the time, it wiggles the whole movement.

I'm not super experienced with front loaders. Is the friction between the dial and bezel what's supposed to hold it in place? It doesn't seem like there's enough here.

20230716_195002.thumb.jpg.317951b3a41df79aac968dd3817d8b2f.jpg

20230716_200109.thumb.jpg.b20de4eaca3206c60ed634b60755da5c.jpg

 

The movement ring on the back is free to spin in the case back, but it seems trapped in place (I haven't tried to force it out).

Edit: my other thought is looking at this lip on the movement ring. Is it possible the ring is supposed to go between the dial and movement? I'm still not sure how that would hold the movement in place, though.

20230716_195133.thumb.jpg.f71716aeff3856e7c1f3f76cb6704bd0.jpg

 

Oh wait, I just remembered something. There was a spring on the stem when I got it that somehow evaporated during cleaning. Could that be what keeps the movement centered? Seems weird, but I guess anything is possible.

If so, where does one find such a tiny replacement spring?

image.png.3f01b8eba0acec2e13bb594e1cef55b8.png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I don't know but a while back we had a misunderstanding about front loaders.  To me the back is removable but the movement comes out of the front, to you the back isn't removable. Does anyone know the answer or is it a mute point  

Looks like a one-piece case to me (monocoque).  Perhaps there was a reflector ring that interfaced to the bezel to hold the movement in place.  I cannot find this case in the Bullova Case Parts Catalog.  I do not see a movement number stamped on the inside where I would expect it.  If there is a number (not visible from the pictures) post that number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This watch has a 1956 date on the caseback which is before Bulova started using case numbers so it won't be in the case parts catalog. I don't have this watch but I have a handful that are somewhat similar.

 

 

2.thumb.jpg.fe1d298ed4341fa10a5bf5728f887ff2.jpg

1.thumb.jpg.a943ca05036d220af78ead3915f86c5a.jpg

 

None of them have a moveable ring like on yours. When the movements are in the case they are somewhat difficult to get out, I have to pry them up to get them to pop out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

I have to pry them up to get them to pop out.

That definitely does not describe mine. It just falls right out the front.

If I get some time tonight I'll pop off the dial and see what I can discover. Thanks for the info!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I don't know but a while back we had a misunderstanding about front loaders.  To me the back is removable but the movement comes out of the front, to you the back isn't removable. Does anyone know the answer or is it a mute point  

I do not know the official meaning of "front loader" but when I use the term, I mean that there is no back that can be removed.  Many pocket watches come out the front even though the back can be opened or removed.

Please, no offense, but it is "moot" and not "mute."  A common error.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I do not know the official meaning of "front loader" but when I use the term, I mean that there is no back that can be removed.  Many pocket watches come out the front even though the back can be opened or removed.

Please, no offense, but it is "moot" and not "mute."  A common error.

You are correct and something I  once knew.  No offence at  all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
×
×
  • Create New...