Jump to content

Just a little wear


transporter

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi is this wear common throughout the clock.  Its pretty bad a lot of bushing to do, never seen a clock so worn the pivots themselves will be suspect. 

Yep, it wear throughout the clock, both trains. 
I was initially called by the customer to set their clock up after they had moved it from upstairs to downstairs.
On arrival the crutch was bent beyond belief where the husband had “got” it going after they had thoughtfully removed the pendulum and forced it back into place.

Its a longcase strike movement from wales dated mid 1700’s so it’s had a fair old life so far.
i will bush sympathetically and where I can without needing to make new components. 

6C64EE43-6819-4435-8AB2-50A9CC52097B.jpeg

52A25ED0-0C4D-48A6-B35C-80A2890BF77F.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 hour Longcase clocks always need a lot of work when it comes to wear, most likely the pivots are worn and the pinion's. Something not right in those two photos both pivots are not long enough for the plate, you might have a made up movement in other words parts that didn't start out together. What is the name on the dial and place.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's odd that the holes are so round, while being so oversize. Perhaps in the past they were broached round, and the pivots retouched, but bushings not put in to compensate the new size difference?

 

As the wear happens the hole tends to go oblong, increasing the surface area touching the pivot (as well as shifting the centers).

 

pivot hole wear2.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name on dial is Lewis from Llanidloes, researched from my Brittens old clocks and watches and it comes up with him from around the 1700,s

Wow I’ve really missed something with this clock……….

it’s running backwards!!!!!!

weight is set up as per the Huygens way, escapement running normally but minute hand going in reverse 😁

12FB6642-9785-41D1-9D9D-44561A7B8AF9.jpeg

Silly me, I threaded the chain incorrectly, I’m driving the great wheel clockwise not anti-clockwise 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...