Jump to content

Movement holders?


BillM

Recommended Posts

I have several of these plastic movement holders and it seems like there’s never a good fit on any movement I use with them. 
This Seiko 6309 is barley held in place, when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes. 
what do you guys use? 

0EB499F7-721B-4CDB-8A46-3B79EF07A03E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Bergeon 4040.

Agreed, a solid tool.  I bought a cheep no-name holder from eBay with free returns.  It was supposed to be a spare holder.  I returned it because it was so poorly machined that only three corners would support the movement from underneath, hold the movement about it's periphery or touch the table at any one time.  The adjustment screw wobbled wich meant the offending corner changed from time to time and ruled out my interest in making any improvements to it.

But a quality tool, you will be better off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The P (plastic) versions don’t do as good a job as the metal versions, as they’re softer and don’t grip the movements as well. I suspect the plastic versions exist for fear of making markings on movements when using the steel ones, but I’ve not seen any damage caused by them - even when clamping them pretty tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you should own an 3D printer you can create perfect fitting holders custom made for each of the movements you work on.

AACEA999-7FF4-4B44-9E81-FD71911D8EA3.thumb.jpeg.a1745a35ec78aba5970559b4f415f36f.jpeg 

4 hours ago, BillM said:

… when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes….

With vice type holders thats my experience too.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mostly use the 4040 or it's little brother 4039, but I also have some that are phenolic fiber in those sizes and really like them too. For "flippy" movements like chronographs  a round full contact holder is best. The round bergeon can be had in any size and adapted, but I often turn them up from Delrin (I make it for a light friction fit) or brass or aluminum which I split and use a screw to tighten. The movement can be fit dial up or down.

 

In the pic bottom left is a commercial chrono holder, the other bottom ones are shop made. Above is one of the phenolic holders and a couple more Delrin shop made and a few of the round metal Bergeons.

20220729_101207.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

 For "flippy" movements like chronographs  a round full contact holder is best. The round bergeon can be had in any size and adapted, but I often turn them up from Delrin (I make it for a light friction fit) or brass or aluminum which I split and use a screw to tighten. The movement can be fit dial up or down.

"Flippy" is a good description. I had a Valjoux chrono flip out several times whilst testing the buttons. It just wouldn't sit properly in the 4040. I've ordered some cheap plastic holders. I'm hoping a bit of cutting/filing and they will be better for such movements.

image.thumb.png.2d37d398d16c35a480754ac8492c2a41.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great info here, thanks everyone. 
looks like I’ll Be making some round holders soon. 

nickelsliver,  do you machine the metals ones just under size and then use a cam screw to expand the opening to fit the movement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can never have too many dedicated size/shape movement holders. I like the Marshall (I think HR made them as well.) 4-sided vise style a lot for small movements, but it sometimes doesn't grip them right. Heck, even the Bergeon holder made for 6 3/4 x 8 ligne movements isn't perfect when trying to hold the movement dial down. Dial up it's great. But it's always nice to have one specifically designed to accommodate a particular movement. I'm always on the lookout for an interesting movement holder that looks like it will work well. 

The Bergeon 4040 looks like a good one, and is truly ubiquitous, but is one I don't have. Good luck.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, here’s my first custom movement holder, pretty happy with it, in fact I wish I would have made this before I started on this movement, I’ll almost done with it. 
 

I ordered the 4040 anyway, but figured I try making one in the mean time.  
thanks for all the help guys!
 

9DF1E4E5-D2E5-42A6-AD9D-070093CE3492.jpeg

64B72DA8-7B75-4210-895D-B1577BF5DD25.jpeg

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nice design. An inner and outer lip to accommodate both the bare movement and the movement+spacer ring.

Most of the available dedicated Seiko 7s26+ holders require the dial holder spacer to be in place.

One exception is the holder by Murphy Manufacturing. It has an inner ring that supports the bare plate and an outer sleeve that can be raised to hold the spacer ring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2022 at 2:59 AM, BillM said:

I have several of these plastic movement holders and it seems like there’s never a good fit on any movement I use with them. 
This Seiko 6309 is barley held in place, when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes. 
what do you guys use? 

0EB499F7-721B-4CDB-8A46-3B79EF07A03E.jpeg

Similar to the cheap Chinese ones. A lot of it has to do with the shape of movement plate. Bevels on the mainplate can cause uneveness on the jaws of the cheap holders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that you need to watch while placing the movement into the holder is what the holder is going to clamp on. In your very first photo it looks like you'd need to rotate the movement so the points where it engages are located on portions of the circumference where there is a solid section (rather than at a point where there is a cut out.

The 4040 has several ways that a movement can be placed and you have to ensure that you have the movement flat and lined up on both sides. You can also flip the 4040 over and use the different configuration on the bottom (or top).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2022 at 3:10 AM, grsnovi said:

One thing that you need to watch while placing the movement into the holder is what the holder is going to clamp on. In your very first photo it looks like you'd need to rotate the movement so the points where it engages are located on portions of the circumference where there is a solid section (rather than at a point where there is a cut out.

The 4040 has several ways that a movement can be placed and you have to ensure that you have the movement flat and lined up on both sides. You can also flip the 4040 over and use the different configuration on the bottom (or top).

Good point G, this is very common. Points of contact can low on cheap movement holders even on bergeon 4040 depending on the shape and layout of the movement. The cheap ones do not have enough depth on the jaws where the size increased are. I prefer the ones that have a wooden grip on each corner. Here are a couple of pocket watch and larger watch size holders and also a jewelers vice with a little hack to create the same idea. Also a circular full grip holder, here the curved jaws are undercut to help grip over a movement lip, also has a nice stable base that doesnt decrease when mounting smaller movements like the bergeon 4040 does.  I mostly use my adapted one as it gives me a nice table to put small parts on when working and the base is permanently sized and stable also. It has a good weight to it unlike other holders that knock about easily, you know its there so to speak. And then the fixed ones that seem far too light for me.

16625386288352696275268388711239.jpg

16625387042604815585657156050487.jpg

1662538757877282388275414005167.jpg

16625388364338617375805324268856.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...