Jump to content

Vostpk Factory Tour


Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

I can say that those hand-operated presses wouldn't be allowed in the USA with all of the OSHA safety regulations. Too exposed.

Yes, on a machinist forum I frequent someone wanted to sell some small presses and there was a unanimous cry "if they were made after 19xx they're scrap". Presses scare the bejezus out of me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

they can and are allowed-you'd be surprised at how many are out there that do still exist and run. I know cuz I've worked on lots of them for years. most if not all have been retrofitted and upgraded with dead man switches and light curtains for safety, from the small 1 tons all the way up to the heavy hitters like the 400 ton that have foundations and pilings that go as deep as 40 ft. if you get anywhere near the business end of the press and it shuts it down in less than what it takes to blink an eye. they're fascinating to watch, much less fun to work on tho...this is interesting to see that they still use ancient presses in their facility. for further reading look up the history of Deuber-Hampden American pocketwatches and where the whole plant and several of its technicians went to in 1921...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading on the machinist forum about a guy carrying out a punch and die set, setting it in someone's trunk, and the set slamming closed as he set it in. There was a mention of "popping grapes" which horrified me but apparently the bloke made a full recovery. I'm eternally terrified of punch sets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What amazes me is there was absolutely no attempt to "sanitize" or hide anything. The setup looks like it was from the '80s. Except for the part where they were using what looks like China made timegraphers.

I can't wait to see the insides of a Chinese watch factory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

What amazes me is there was absolutely no attempt to "sanitize" or hide anything. The setup looks like it was from the '80s. Except for the part where they were using what looks like China made timegraphers.

I can't wait to see the insides of a Chinese watch factory.

Most of the set up looked way older than the eighties to me.  Does anyone have any idea how old some of the machines are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I remember reading on the machinist forum about a guy carrying out a punch and die set, setting it in someone's trunk, and the set slamming closed as he set it in. There was a mention of "popping grapes" which horrified me but apparently the bloke made a full recovery. I'm eternally terrified of punch sets.

🤢 🤮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way back when the super for my building was a punch press operator during the day. He was missing several fingers.

No doubt operators under time pressure would disable the safety manacles on the press, they were uncomfortable and interfered with loading the press.

Modern optical fences are much better.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I watched the Vostok video. YouTube figured I liked it, and served me up this one of the Raketa factory this morning:

If you're not hip to the tech, you can turn on closed captions, and under settings have it auto-translate to whatever language. It's a bit hit or miss, and started out good, but toward the end of the video (I assume when things started getting technical) it pretty much fell apart into an unintelligible word salad.

The first half looks to be just hanging out in the gift shop, but they do ultimately show the actual manufacturing. Very different from Vostok. Vostok is much bigger, but looks like ancient tools being kept alive by accident. Raketa looks much more like what I would expect a Russian watch manufacturer to look like; old tools, but reasonably well maintained. If I were to buy a new Russian watch today, I'd definitely be looking at a Raketa over a Vostok.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2022 at 7:43 PM, nickelsilver said:

set slamming closed as he set it in. There was a mention of "popping grapes"

worked with a guy in a huge mfg. facility that included a punch press dept. . one of the operators was missing his left hand and forearm to just below his elbow. still working on the presses 30+ years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed 
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...