Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I received the Horia clone and so far am pretty impressed.  Hadn't used it yet though.

I also got an Epilame bottle that I will be using for cleaning pallet forks and balances.  Far less money than the crazy expensive ones I've seen.  Has a mesh basket to hold the parts.  A glass marble sits in the neck to reduce evaporation while the bottle is upright.  Silicone gaskets to keep it all sealed up.  Hopefully, they will hold up to solvents such as Hexane.  A bit larger in size than I expected.

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805561125727.html

 

epilame_bottle.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having hard time understanding where exactly is the epilame bottle needed. Is it not the same just having some small glass bottle and picking the part with tweezers? Maybe it's handy for treating multiple parts at once but I only submerge escape wheel. I treat pallet jewels with oiler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Malocchio said:

I'm having hard time understanding where exactly is the epilame bottle needed. Is it not the same just having some small glass bottle and picking the part with tweezers? Maybe it's handy for treating multiple parts at once but I only submerge escape wheel. I treat pallet jewels with oiler.

It's just easier to pick out the treated parts from the small metal basket than the bottom of the bottle, especially the cap jewels used in shock settings. All the time you are trying to pick them up the fluid is evaporating, also the small neck helps reduce fluid loss due to evaporation. But a definite 'nice to have' rather than a necessity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Waggy said:

It's just easier to pick out the treated parts from the small metal basket than the bottom of the bottle, especially the cap jewels used in shock settings. All the time you are trying to pick them up the fluid is evaporating, also the small neck helps reduce fluid loss due to evaporation. But a definite 'nice to have' rather than a necessity.

Ok for cap jewels I definitely understand. I use oiler for the cap jewels too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Malocchio said:

Ok for cap jewels I definitely understand. I use oiler for the cap jewels too. 

I forgot to mention cleaning jewels.  I'll be using this bottle for cleaning those, balance wheels and pallet forks.  The current bottle that I was using lets the Hexane evaporate too quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone tried the Chinese bezel remover tool with 4 wedge blades, a blue knob, and red aluminum base? Cousins may sell it too. The prices I see on it are suddenly about $20 lower than I remembered and it's moved from "not until I need it" into "sure why not" range. Unless it's junk. Thoughts?

Screenshot_20231014-105202.png.92c55c66ddfe5d54cf3d800a6615f0b5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

Has anyone tried the Chinese bezel remover tool with 4 wedge blades, a blue knob, and red aluminum base? Cousins may sell it too. The prices I see on it are suddenly about $20 lower than I remembered and it's moved from "not until I need it" into "sure why not" range. Unless it's junk. Thoughts?

 

I recently got one as they seemed so cheap, £16, and I'm surprised at how good the quality is. 

I also bought a screw extractor, as that seem cheap, about £13. I haven't used it yet, but the quality seems OK.

image.png.adddcefb08678b9c5e8041c461848e83.png

 

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mbwatch said:

Has anyone tried the Chinese bezel remover tool with 4 wedge blades, a blue knob, and red aluminum base? Cousins may sell it too. The prices I see on it are suddenly about $20 lower than I remembered and it's moved from "not until I need it" into "sure why not" range. Unless it's junk. Thoughts?

Screenshot_20231014-105202.png.92c55c66ddfe5d54cf3d800a6615f0b5.png

I have. My experience is that the blades are soft trash. I prefer this https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/microshock-case-opener-horotec?code=C0310

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I also bought a screw extractor, as that seem cheap, about £13. I haven't used it yet, but the quality seems OK.

I got the Bergeon version and although it works very well the tip of the rods that press against the screw easily disintegrates (can be bought as spares). So, my advice is don't press harder on the screw than what's required to get it turning.

11 hours ago, Malocchio said:

I have. My experience is that the blades are soft trash.

I got this type of bezel remover from CousinsUK, and have had no problem with the blades. The screws holding the blades, however, are "soft trash". Noticed it when I tried to tighten them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have experience of this hand removal tool? I guess it's for hand fitting too? Now I have a very cheap and wobbly hand press. There's so much play that it's like doing everything free hand. This one's $176 in Ali. Any hand press suggestions?

 

https://a.aliexpress.com/_mPo00bmScreenshot_2023-10-21-12-07-54-297_com.alibaba.aliexpresshd-edit.jpg

Edited by Malocchio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Malocchio said:

Does anyone have experience of this hand removal tool? I guess it's for hand fitting too? Now I have a very cheap and wobbly hand press. There's so much play that it's like doing everything free hand. This one's $176 in Ali. Any hand press suggestions?

 

https://a.aliexpress.com/_mPo00bmScreenshot_2023-10-21-12-07-54-297_com.alibaba.aliexpresshd-edit.jpg

I have one and I have had issues with it. The pushing needle is not exactly aligned the relevant holes and slot so it is extremely fiddly. I have only used this tool twice so it might just be me being cack handed. 

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I bought a hand press, but find them fiddly to use. I prefer just to press them on by hand. A removal tool for chrono's is useful. Have you got the price right - I see it for £48 ($58)

There are different prices for parts of the set. Complete set is $176 for me. I like to press a little with tweezers and finish with a press for some precision. That tool doesn't seem to come with any hand fitting attachments but according to description it should accept screw-in Bergeon pushers that cost like £17 a piece.

18 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I have one and I have had issues with it. The pushing needle is not exactly aligned the relevant holes and slot so it is extremely fiddly. I have only used this tool twice so it might just be me being cack handed. 

Is the needle used just for keeping the hand from falling when lifting the hand? Have you used it as a hand press?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2023 at 5:18 PM, mikepilk said:

I recently got one as they seemed so cheap, £16, and I'm surprised at how good the quality is. 

I also bought a screw extractor, as that seem cheap, about £13. I haven't used it yet, but the quality seems OK.

image.png.adddcefb08678b9c5e8041c461848e83.png

 

Thank you for the comment on the screw extractor. Ordered one.

Edited by rossjackson01
Spelling, Grammar, more information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have the movement holders for each specific movement, I just use a Bergeon 4040. So if the movement isn't sat exactly flat, and the often aren't, then the above type of hand fitting tools are no good. Hence I find just simple hand held pushers under a microscope work fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/21/2023 at 8:58 PM, GuyMontag said:

 

I have one of these and really like it.

 

One more thing. Don't you need to have many different size movement holders with it? The one I linked comes with four different sizes but even the biggest, 11½ Ligne, is too small for average Seikos. Larger holders don't seem to exist except for obviously the Bergeon ones that cost a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Malocchio said:

One more thing. Don't you need to have many different size movement holders with it? The one I linked comes with four different sizes but even the biggest, 11½ Ligne, is too small for average Seikos. Larger holders don't seem to exist except for obviously the Bergeon ones that cost a lot.

Yes, although you don't have to. However, if you use the holders designed for the press then you don't have to worry about lining up the holder to get the plunger aligned to the center hands, which for me is one of the biggest benefits of this press. With a normal movement holder you can make it work by covering the holder mount with something flat but then you have to align the plunger to the hands every time. Of course, if doing a chronograph or sub-seconds watches you need to move the holder regardless.

Someone uploaded a 3D design so you can print out a platform for the press. You can also 3D print the movement holders so you can have a custom holder for any movement you use with the press.

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GuyMontag said:

Yes, although you don't have to. However...

Thanks for the quick reply. I just noticed this was discussed on a previous page. I knew I had seen the discussion but somehow didn't find it with the search. I ordered the press and a Bergeon 5409 copy too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you are right. I can see now that the case would have been blued from new with a finish similar to the inner surfaces of the opening case back. As you say, there's no easy way to match that finish at home (obviously a home chemical blue such as the gun blue isn't quite acceptable). I will stick with cleaning with soap and water in the ultrasonic and consider the tarnish to be part of its charm. 
    • I can try a big tweezer the biggest I had in my set didn’t do the trick but I’ll check if my wife has some none watchmaking ones. 
    • Yes, gum netal, which actually means iron. It is thick enough to be grinded in order to remove the rust pits and then polished, but it will need blackening oxidation in the end for protection from getting rusty. The watch has nothing to do with the railways, it is the same like the 'squirrel' candys - You do not really expect to find a squirrel inside...
    • I think the app is misinterpreted the noise because of the extra case construction    Tom
    • I have just picked up a vintage soviet Zarja watch and I have been inspecting it prior to putting it on the 'to be serviced' pile. When I measured it with the timegrapher app, I found it was gaining loads of time. Taking the case back off, I find it's a tiny movement within a relatively large watch and it has a separate steel cover over the movement which presumably holds it in place against the caseback.   Checking the app again without the cover, I find it is actually running reasonably well for an untouched old watch. Putting the cover and the caseback back in place and it reads as massively gaining time again. This behaviour is consistent every time I take the cover on and off. I have checked the balance cock is fixed and the screw is tight, so I assume that the cover and case back are pinching the movement in some way and making it run fast. Not sure I can see how that works because if the cover is touching the balance, surely it would make it stop not run faster? It can't be touching just the hairspring to make it effectively shorter.  Placing only the cover in place or placing just the caseback in place (not even snapping it shut) both cause the fast running. Pretty sure there are a couple of millimetres clearance between the case back and the movement when the cover isn't there. I have also checked the watch, cover and case back for magnetism with another phone app but none of them seem to have an appreciable magnetic field. Perhaps I need to preemptively demagnetise and get a real compass to check them with.  I appreciate that this is just an app using the built in microphone on my phone - could it be misreading a ringing / reverberation of this cover to give the wrong result? Observing the watch just running on the bench closed up, it does seem to be appreciably gaining time. I will wind it, set the time and leave it running overnight and see how it does with no cover / back in place. Perhaps I will also see how it performs on the wrist to rule out misreading by the app    What am I missing here?
×
×
  • Create New...