Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This hole accepts the screw that holds the balance cock.  The threads are stripped.  Gotta wonder how that happened.

This is far more serious than the Lorsa thread issue I posted about last year.  I do not think closing with a domed tap will be enough.

Also, the cock may not allow a larger diameter screw unless I open the hole in the cock...maybe that is what I will have to do.

Thoughts/

IMG_8222.JPG

IMG_8223.JPG

Posted
52 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Thoughts

I would try a bit of closing hole first.  If absolutely no holding to the screw, you will need to drill the hole bigger, fit a brass plug, then tap it for the original screw.

I don't know what the book says but having one I would do all that on the lathe with faceplate fixture to hold the plate, enlarge the thread hole, drill the plug, and tap it with the tailstock as a guide.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jdm said:

I would try a bit of closing hole first.  If absolutely no holding to the screw, you will need to drill the hole bigger, fit a brass plug, then tap it for the original screw.

I don't know what the book says but having one I would do all that on the lathe with faceplate fixture to hold the plate, enlarge the thread hole, drill the plug, and tap it with the tailstock as a guide.

This sounds like a fun lathe project.  I do not have a faceplate fixture...not even sure what that is, but I will do some googling.  In the mean time, I made find a donor watch...you know...worst case scenario!

Posted
40 minutes ago, jdm said:

I would try a bit of closing hole first.  If absolutely no holding to the screw, you will need to drill the hole bigger, fit a brass plug, then tap it for the original screw.

I don't know what the book says but having one I would do all that on the lathe with faceplate fixture to hold the plate, enlarge the thread hole, drill the plug, and tap it with the tailstock as a guide.

That’s exactly what I was thinking. Needs to be spot on target and the faceplate holder will do that. 

Posted
14 hours ago, jdrichard said:

faceplate holder

Oh boy...something else to buy.  Can somebody show me a picture?  I have seen some pictures on the interweb but want to be sure I am looking for the right thing.

Posted

Oh and I assume you have the Elgin tap assortment? One of the things nice With Elgin once had was a small box of all of the taps for the various screw sizes they had.

 

Posted
8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

OK, I know what I am looking for...on the hunt!!!

I thought for anyone else that wants to know what a faceplate is I have some images.

watchmakers faceplate page 3.JPG

face plate page 2.JPG

face plate page 1.JPG

Posted
6 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Hoping it turns true.

You do know that it doesn't actually have to turn true don't you? In other words the Centering pin that comes in the backside really doesn't have to center. There's other ways to Center things on the faceplate like the thing I always find the peculiar name you use a wobble stick. There is a term you can look up then you don't need the thing that's in the backside and then he can also be absolutely sure you're running true.

Posted

Well, what I mean is...the holding disk is perpendicular to the collet. if it is manufactured correctly...a good assumption, then all is well. but, if it were dropped or otherwise mistreated, then it might wobble. once i get it, i will return for guidance.

Posted
On 3/8/2022 at 3:58 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

Bought one on ebay. Hoping it turns true. Will see when it arrives. Excited to learn something new.

It arrived today.  Beautiful...should work great (not "user" proof though...lol).

QUESTION

How much greater than the screw diameter should the bushing diameter be?  If the screw diameter is 1mm what should the diameter of the bushing be?

Posted
3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

How much greater than the screw diameter should the bushing diameter be?  If the screw diameter is 1mm what should the diameter of the bushing be?

I'm no machinist, but I would shoot for a similar excess diameter as the brass jewel settings have around the jewels.  That seems like plenty, and it would keep the visual appearance consistent

  • Like 1
Posted

Well, I have decided for the option of tapping larger threads in the plate and making an appropriate screw.  Seems like less of a risk for an amateur.  I made the screw so far.

2022-03-13 12_18_18-IMG_8256.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-13 12_18_33-IMG_8259.JPG ‎- Photos.png

  • Like 2
Posted

Is that your first screw? That looks great! Looks like you tapped with a screwplate, Martin L? The thread pitch will be different to Elgin, but doesn't mean it won't work. Work it in with a little oil.

 

Which reminds me, how do mathematicians deal with constipation?

They work it out with a pencil.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Is that your first screw? That looks great! Looks like you tapped with a screwplate, Martin L? The thread pitch will be different to Elgin, but doesn't mean it won't work. Work it in with a little oil.

 

Which reminds me, how do mathematicians deal with constipation?

They work it out with a pencil.

This is my 4th or 5th screw. I get a little better each time.

yes, a screw plate. I have 4 or 5...don’t remember which one. I tapped the hole using a tap Thea seemed to match the screw plate, but, in the end I think it was a little off, so the screw itself became the tap.

i am very confused be these screw plates I have and screws and thread sizes in general for watches.

Posted

Threads are bit of a can of worms. The old Martin threads, the most common screwplates, are by and large pretty close to modern metric threads. But the U.S. companies generally had their own threads- each company had its own threads.

  • Like 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

i am very confused be these screw plates I have and screws and thread sizes in general for watches.

I suppose the confusion has to do with trying to figure out the standards?

1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

But the U.S. companies generally had their own threads- each company had its own threads.

Darn somebody beat me to the answer?

Yes everyone assumes their standards for screws sizes used in everything on the planet. But all the American watch companies had their own sizes. I think only Elgin and Waltham ever published their sizes everyone else it's a mystery.  

It's why you can have a whole bunch of boxes of screws and try to replace one find that none of them will fit.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

You guys are “Johnny on the spot” answering this screw dilemma...but I need one of you geniuses to answer my clock question because, that is the one where I am really “screwed.”

  • 9 months later...
Posted
On 3/8/2022 at 3:54 PM, JohnR725 said:

I thought for anyone else that wants to know what a faceplate is I have some images.

watchmakers faceplate page 3.JPG

face plate page 2.JPG

face plate page 1.JPG

@JohnR725, I have one of these but it was missing the index pin that runs through the center.  So, I recently purchased some 4.5mm round stock to make one.  The round stock is a perfect fit except that my faceplate(s) have a key inside the collet housing...much like the spindle of a WW lathe.  Seems to me there is no good reason for this key>  The index pin is symmetric in the theta plane.  There seems to me no reason for key in the collet.  Any thoughts???

The key is made of soft metal and I can punch it out easily enough.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
×
×
  • Create New...