Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is an Elgin pocket watch Grade 384.  I posted about making a staff and breaking the roller table.

I got a balance complete and installed it today.

It was running slow.  I thought maybe there was a hairspring length problem, so I exchanged with the original hairspring.  SLOW.

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

I am wondering about extra weight due to the extra screws.  This balance wheel is designed to compensate for temperature and the screws are part of that calibration process--I know that much.

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This is an Elgin pocket watch Grade 384.  I posted about making a staff and breaking the roller table.

I got a balance complete and installed it today.

It was running slow.  I thought maybe there was a hairspring length problem, so I exchanged with the original hairspring.  SLOW.

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

I am wondering about extra weight due to the extra screws.  This balance wheel is designed to compensate for temperature and the screws are part of that calibration process--I know that much.

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

If it runs slow. Depends how slow it runs. I would remove weight from the mean-time screws. But make sure it is not something else, like the regulator pins being too far apart. That would cause it to run slow. Or perhaps the hairspring is outside the regulator pins. Does it have a good amplitude?

Posted
57 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Isn't it an overcoil?

Yes.

 

2 hours ago, jdrichard said:

If it runs slow. Depends how slow it runs. I would remove weight from the mean-time screws. But make sure it is not something else, like the regulator pins being too far apart. That would cause it to run slow. Or perhaps the hairspring is outside the regulator pins. Does it have a good amplitude?

It has good amplitude.

While I think there is still some issue with the balance, it is secondary to another issue.  It seems that there is binding in the keyless works which is giving resistance to the center wheel via the cannon pinion.  This evening I discovered that that the minute hand even STOPPED while the balance was ticking away.

More investigation is required...but I am going to turn in.  Those who fight and run away live to fight another day.

It is a most interesting problem...I will keep you updated as it unfolds.

Posted

 

8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Should I shorten the hairpsring?  Remove screws?

With overcoils, removing weight from screws is THE option. 

 

8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Amplitude is good.

Now I am wondering about the actual balance wheel.  See the pictures.

Good amplitude sends me to look for  cause of the issue  outside main train,  I think you have found where the issue is located,  I would eliminate the minute train and see what happens. 

I haven't received a picutre.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

With overcoils, removing weight from screws is THE option. 

This is definitely correct. Over coil hairsprings are premade. Premade so that they can be in very exacting specifications. Changing the length with a screw up the specifications and is not acceptable unless you're super desperate and it's still not acceptable. The preferred method is to play with the screws that's why they're there.

And yes there it exacting specifications so it's best not the play with them too much and if you are playing with them try to do it close to the alarm if you are worried about the temperature because the closer you are to an arm the less likely it is to bother anything. Usually today nobody worries or cares about that.

7 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This evening I discovered that that the minute hand even STOPPED while the balance was ticking away.

Usually best to verify your watch is working before you case it up and put the hands on.

Then out of curiosity just how slow are we talking anyway? Plus I seem to be having eyesight problems I can't see the pictures?

 

Posted

I took the picture but failed to attache it.  Here it is.  The balance to the right is the old balance.

I have since removed the two screws at the spokes in order not to affect temperature compensation.  I figured that much out.

Yes it is an overcoil, and I see that the length should not be fiddled with.  In fact one of the studs has no feature for adjusting.

2022-03-01 16_56_31-20220301_163700.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Posted

OK, more pictures and an interesting discovery.

On the theory that there is some binding on the dial side (aka motion works), I took a look at the plate that covers the minute wheel.  It is not planer (shown in the image clamped to a razor blade).  Perhaps that is a problem.  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher.  I will provide some additional detail on a subsequent post.

2022-03-02 08_32_50-IMG_8178.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_34-IMG_8177.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_02-IMG_8175.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

Posted
9 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher. 

Is there any problem other than runing slow?   helps to know   how slow  ? 

I make sure the fault isn't anywhere else,  before I touch a balance of this grade.  think you are rushing.

Regards

 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Is there any problem other than runing slow?   helps to know   how slow  ? 

I make sure the fault isn't anywhere else,  before I touch a balance of this grade.  think you are rushing.

Regards

 

No, the staff was broken.  I attempted to make a staff and failed...broke the roller table (staff was 40um to large in diameter).  All of this was covered in a different post.  Bought a new balance complete on ebay.  That is what is installed on the balance cock. 

How slow?  The timegrapher indicated hundreds of seconds per day.  But, the signature was somewhat unbelievable.  Then I noticed that within a day, I lost an hour or more.  BUT!!!  At the end of the day yesterday I discovered that the keyless works work impeding the cannon pinion.  That is what caused me to investigate the minute wheel cover plate.

Am I going too fast and in the wrong order?  Perhaps.  Perhaps not.  Here is a timeline of this watch which has been going on for a week and a half.

Opened the watch to discover broken balance.
Proceeded with disassembly and clean anyway.
After clean, I disassembled the balance.
Found a staff that was close and turned it to fit (almost!! grrrr)
Installed the staff on the balance wheel.
Put the balance wheel in the watch without hairspring or roller table and guard.
Tested for end shake and side shake--seemed fine.
Installed the safety roller and roller jewel--busted the roller jewel because I failed to turn the staff down enough.
Found a new balance complete on ebay
Installed it when it arrived.
Good amplitude but erratic timegrapher behavior
Put the watch on my oscilloscope to view the trace.  A little noisy, but a reasonable (IMO) signature.
Appeared to be a little out of beat.  I adjusted the collet and got it closer in beat (though this was a minor issue)
Back on the bench, install hands
Discovered losing on the order of an hour during the day
<<<<at this point I should have spent some time in reflection>>>>
Removed the hairspring and installed the original hairspring.
No real difference.
Removed two screws from the balance.
THEN I DISCOVERED THAT THE KEYLESS WORKS MIGHT BE THE PROBLEM
Investigated the minute wheel and cover...non planar
It is running on the bench now without the minute-wheel cover plate
 

Posted

Here a timegrapher plot--snow storm

And...an oscilloscope trace.  I set the cursors to indicate 5Hz as a reference.

Yes, it seems to be going fast now...but that is after removing the two screws and some regulator adjustment.

2022-03-02 10_26_47-SDS00001.png ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 10_28_31-20220302_102239.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Posted

 I think you will be putting the screws and the spring that came on the new balance complete back on, as you have found the fault and its the minute gear bridge.

As always American watches show bad temper specially in area of banking pins, pallets so on.

I'll be reading JohnR advice and  trying to learn as you fix this one. 

Good luck

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 I think you will be putting the screws and the spring that came on the new balance complete back on, as you have found the fault and its the minute gear bridge.

As always American watches show bad temper specially in area of banking pins, pallets so on.

I'll be reading JohnR advice and  trying to learn as you fix this one. 

Good luck

 

 

 

I put the screws back on.  Gonna wait on the spring.  Every time you take it apart, there is additional risk.  The screws were easy because I have the right tools!!  Yay.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I decided not to read anything below the pictures because we have a problem?

As a reminder this is an American pocket watch and there's a problem? When the movement is out of the case there is no stem. Why is that a problem the stem is found in the case the position of the stem is controlled by the sleeve in the case. When an American pocket watch comes out of the case it goes into setting. Like my picture isn't that wheel in the setting position? As everybody should grasp if you run a watch while in setting your driving the entire setting mechanism and simplistically that is bad.

American watch companies grasping that their movements might have to run out of the case usually have a procedure to put it into the winding position or running position. I can't see enough of the movement to see what I need to see. Sometimes they'll be a screw that you turn other times they'll be a little lever like thing that's near where the stem would go in that you pull out. To basically look at how the setting components work and there should be something in there to allow it to go back in the winding position. That hopefully will improve things

then if you ever seen any of my windings and fussing is about hairsprings now you know why hairsprings are typically vibrated to each balance wheel. But if you have an over a coil of the over coil has to be made very exacting position. So what they do is they match the balance wheel to the hairspring. The factory had all the different timing screws and then they also undercut the balance screws themselves to bring each one into the right timing to match the hairspring. This is why mixing and matching hairsprings will result in dramatic timing issues. So I would put the original hairspring back on the balance wheel and try to deal with the hot otherwise you're going to have to be playing with the screws quite a bit and you may still have to do it if somebody did a mix-and-match of not grasping that one hairspring is not identical to another.

 

 

pocket watch running in setting mode is bad.JPG

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

I decided not to read anything below the pictures because we have a problem?

As a reminder this is an American pocket watch and there's a problem? When the movement is out of the case there is no stem. Why is that a problem the stem is found in the case the position of the stem is controlled by the sleeve in the case. When an American pocket watch comes out of the case it goes into setting. Like my picture isn't that wheel in the setting position? As everybody should grasp if you run a watch while in setting your driving the entire setting mechanism and simplistically that is bad.

American watch companies grasping that their movements might have to run out of the case usually have a procedure to put it into the winding position or running position. I can't see enough of the movement to see what I need to see. Sometimes they'll be a screw that you turn other times they'll be a little lever like thing that's near where the stem would go in that you pull out. To basically look at how the setting components work and there should be something in there to allow it to go back in the winding position. That hopefully will improve things

then if you ever seen any of my windings and fussing is about hairsprings now you know why hairsprings are typically vibrated to each balance wheel. But if you have an over a coil of the over coil has to be made very exacting position. So what they do is they match the balance wheel to the hairspring. The factory had all the different timing screws and then they also undercut the balance screws themselves to bring each one into the right timing to match the hairspring. This is why mixing and matching hairsprings will result in dramatic timing issues. So I would put the original hairspring back on the balance wheel and try to deal with the hot otherwise you're going to have to be playing with the screws quite a bit and you may still have to do it if somebody did a mix-and-match of not grasping that one hairspring is not identical to another.

 

 

pocket watch running in setting mode is bad.JPG

Good points of course.  What was not fully conveyed was that, literally, the cannon pinion would lock hard and the hand would not move.  I posted about the non-planarity of the minute wheel cover.  I have since investigated further.  Running your finger on the bottom of the plate I could also feel a burr.  Anyway, using an extra fine diamond plate, I smoothed the bottom and established a planar surface and thus removed the burr.

In terms of running in setting position, frankly I missed that.  Will remedy and report back.

As far is the uniqueness of every watch that goes out of the factory w/r to balance and hairspring--I get it.  To do it right, I should remove the staff, roller, and hairspring and put it on the other balance wheel--a matched set.  Gonna try to avoid that if possible (if I were a couple of years down the road, perhaps I would not hesitate).

I will report back.

Posted
10 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 To do it right, I should remove the staff, roller, and hairspring and put it on the other balance wheel--a matched set.  Gonna try to avoid that if possible (if I were a couple of years down the road, perhaps I would not hesitate).

I will report back.

It's simpler than that. The hairspring is matched to the balance assembly, which is comprised of the balance, staff and roller. For all intents and purposes the roller and staff are interchangeable; if you replace a staff (carefully) there is rarely any need to even touch the poise, much less the general rate, same with roller.

 

But the inertia of one balance compared to another, even seemingly identical, can vary wildly, so springs and balances become a set.

 

Also, you would never remove and reinstall a staff, as it would just be a mess.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Don't think I am being evasive...I am still working this problem...just stay tuned!!

I am multi-tasking...working on watches, clocks, mechanical, quartz...working on my brain plasticity!!

Posted

Update!!

I removed the two screws at the spokes and the watch ran too fast.  I replaced those spots with smaller screws.

It has kept good time over the last 24 hours and the regulator is about 30 degrees off center, so not too bad.

Progress

Posted
On 3/2/2022 at 9:37 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

OK, more pictures and an interesting discovery.

On the theory that there is some binding on the dial side (aka motion works), I took a look at the plate that covers the minute wheel.  It is not planer (shown in the image clamped to a razor blade).  Perhaps that is a problem.  Still does not resolve the terrible time signature on the time grapher.  I will provide some additional detail on a subsequent post.

2022-03-02 08_32_50-IMG_8178.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_34-IMG_8177.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-03-02 08_32_02-IMG_8175.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

You need to have a dial washer to ouch down the hour wheel so it engages when th the Minute wheel when the face is on and the watch is Not face up. Gravity not your friend.

Posted

Well, the saga continues...trying to dial this thing in like a RR watch!  It is an opportunity to learn new things.

This morning I added some timing washers.  Trying to get the regulator mid scale when timed. 

Happily, me pappy left me this nice assortment of timing washers...calibrated in minutes/day.

2022-03-10 08_32_36-Window.png

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

UPDATE: After swapping in successively smaller timing washers, I have this watch keeping great time with the regulator at mid scale!  Waiting on a sub second hand to arrive then I will finish this and deliver it to the owner.

  • Like 3
  • 1 year later...
Posted

This is an older one but I'm just stopping by to say I learned a bunch from this interesting thread. I came here to see if pulling out timing screws on a wristwatch movement might get me closer to timekeeping without pushing the regulator to its +limit. I knew the balance wheel and hairspring were matched, but what I had was one with a good staff & hairspring twisted badly right at the collet, and another with a good hairspring and broken staff.

 

It's quite a cheap 7j watch and it's for me to keep so I thought I'd try swapping them since I don't know how to fix a hairspring twisted where I can't even grip it.

But the main thing I got here is the info about American pocket watches driving the setting mechanism when uncased. This might explain why I've had a few where acceptable regulation goes awry once I cased it.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...