Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most, if not all Omegas have a serial number. I don't see one on this watch. I'm no expert on Omega, but the watch movement you have pictures of doesn't appear to be of particularly high quality.

I guess you could ask the seller what they base their claim on, but my gut feeling is that is probably not an early Omega. There is a list (incomplete?) of Omega serial numbers here.

http://www.pocketwatchrepair.com/histories/omega.html

Louis Brandt & Frere were the original company behind the Omega brand.

There is also a list of some of the trade marks of Omega Watch Co. SA / Louis Brandt & Frere
here.

https://www.mikrolisk.de/show.php?site=280&suchwort=Omega&searchWhere=all#sucheMarker

However to be a genuine Omega watch, it would almost certainly have the Omega brand on it. None of their other brand names are "Genuine Omega" either (but slightly closer connected to the Omega brand  than some of the more obvious fakes out there).

Be aware that some sellers will use association (like saying a Sicura pin lever is a Sicura by Brietling) to claim a watch has a particular pedigree, when that is not accurate. Sicura bought the Breitling brand when Breitling went out of business, so a more accurate statement might be Breitling by Sicura, but either way, Sicura watches are not the same thing as Breitling watches, any more than an Omega with an ETA movement in it is a Swatch.

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a Dennison case with the specially-fitted bow.  Really good case.  But although Omega has used Dennison cases before, I have to agree with the gentlemen before me: we see no symbol or name on the dial, no symbol or name evident on the movement, no serial number in sight, and no other indications.  If I were going to buy it, that seller would need to provide quite a bit of proof on this one if he wanted to convince me it was an Omega. I don't know where they hid the serial on this one (if it has one) but if under-dial photos or under-balance-cock photos were available, I'd ask to see them if the seller were asking Omega-level prices.

That said, if the seller is being extremely reasonable, I'd be tempted to buy it just for the case.  Those Dennison cases are nice.

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. There is a slight chance it is Omega, since some importers (important Jewellers for example) would insist on purchasing sterile dial watches. Also dials do get replaced after the fact, so it may be a replacement dial. However there would almost certainly be some makers mark some where on the watch, perhaps behind the dial, maybe behind the balance, or on the edge of the movement.

The case is quite nice, but if you buy it for the case only, that obviously should be reflected in the price you are willing to pay.

Although the case is Denison, I would kind of expect that too to be stamped with an Omega mark,

image.png.bf399b7d471a6c7a4ebc152d80b8bb5e.png

Something similar to this perhaps.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

It went for £80, way to much I think 

I would say so. If you look in the ebay sold listings for Omega pocket watches, under £80 there are currently 82 items, a large number of which look genuine, so if you are looking for a genuine Omega PW in that price bracket, take your time, and find something with less questionable provenance.

image.png.3edf7bac4dcfd826912e192e724eabd1.png

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what its worth, if you look up Omega and/or Brandt on bidfun, you will see quite a number of different calibers, but none seem an exact match for the one above.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk

Enter the keyword omega  (or brandt).

The serial numbers generally appear on both the dial side, and/or on at least one of the bridges on the balance side.
There are also Omega trade marks on most of the examples and in some cases an Ω on the balance cock.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi all,  I am currently working on a tissot 2481 (equal to an omega 1481) and have tried to replace the mainspring, I ordered the correct spring from cousins but the centre spiral wasn’t tight enough for the arbour, the only option I had (with limited skills and knowledge) was to bend the spring to suit, after several attempts to get the correct size it led to the spring snapping is there an alternative mainspring suggestion as it seems it is the cousins Swiss one I’m having the issue with or does anyone know where I can source a mainspring barrel complete? thank you in advance Sam
    • Update Learning by my observations. Looking under the microscope it is obvious I am not the first. Minute scratches on the pallet bridge. Found the problem. The train of wheels bridge had not been placed correct. Pivot hole on the second wheel was lifted by pressure on the screws. None of the train would turn. The pallet fork jewels were misaligned. Spring on the jewel for balance on the dial side was broken. The balance would not rotate as the pallet fork would not engage. Hairspring was out of shape.  It had obviously never worked since the last person did the 'service'.  Priced replacement pallet fork and balance. Cheaper to get a new movement. Conversed with owner. This is what he wants. Ah well.
    • That still seems to be what mine is designed for. No position has any effect on friction. And it feels like overkill to be an eccentric adjustment since the anvil plate already has enough motion. It's one more thing to knock out of adjustment at the wrong time.
    • Yes thats possible, that pivot could well have more friction when sat in the dimple, might be enough to stop the balance. If the dimple is deep enough and the staff pivot has worn down as well, which it most probably has then the staff could end up riding on the underneath of the balance jewel at it's shoulder height and stop the oscillations.  When the spring is removed it is only held at one point , at the collet on the staff, in this situation the spring is free to take on it's own natural shape. When fitted to the movement the spring is then held at 2 points, the collet and the stud, 3 if you include the regulating pins. In that situation the spring is being pulled from its natural shape if the 3 points are not correctly adjusted to match the spring's shape, usually just at the stud can bring things into alignment. Bunching up of the coils more often makes the spring oscillate faster, in effect taking the active timing point from the regulating pins to the bunched up coils , closest to the collet.
×
×
  • Create New...