Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I tried to order a crown for a couple of watches that have the same specs, and what I got was so far off what I wanted, that I'm going to ask for help this time.

I have two watches, one with a Cattin C66 movement and one with an EB8800 movement.  They both have the same stem thread and the same crown tube dimensions so I can order two of the same crown.  I spent 40 quid on a fancy Bergeon crown gauge, but it's got thread sizes in mm and not tap sizes.  I don't know how to convert tap sizes to mm...

So the dimensions I want are:

Crown: roughly 5.8mm in diameter and roughly 3.5mm tall (I measured these from another watch I have and thought it would look nice on these also)

Crown Tube: OD: 2mm+ ID: 1.6mm Length: 2.6mm

Stem thread: 1.2mm

These are both dive watches, so I though that the double o-ring type would be best, and I need it in chrome.  I found a couple on Cousins site that are within .5mm on the diameter and near what I want on the rest of the dimensions, but they only seem to come in Tap 9 and higher.  I found a chart here: https://blog.esslinger.com/stem-tap-mm-size-cross-reference-chart/  and it suggests that my 1.2mm measurement means tap 7, but I read several other places that suggest that almost all dive watches of this vintage have Tap 9.  This is why I'm asking...

I appreciate any feedback and suggestions.  I usually order from Cousins, and if Tap 9 is the right answer, then I think this one is the best fit:  9 x Ø5.50 x 2.50mm x (H3.4mm) SS, Swiss

Stem_Crown.JPG

Posted

Also, I just realized that perhaps the Bergeon gauge is perhaps measuring Threads per mm and maybe that's why the Tap conversion chart messed me up last time?

Posted

Have a look at Esslingers web site  and look up windingstem tap size chart,   then do the same for Cousins uk. For some reason cousins use a different tap per mm than all the others  so cross reference the mm size with the tap size. unfortunately the chart I have will not down load to the site.       cheers

 

Posted

Cousins has this in the description:

image.png.d67e8f1ca67aaacee005f631f3870df9.png

So by that perhaps I should be ordering tap 12 (12 = 1.2mm)?  It seems more logical than tap 7 but strange that they don't follow the same protocols as everyone else.

Posted

It is somewhat counter intuitive but stem diameters and tap sizes don't work that way, it just happens that Tap 9 coincides with 0.9mm which makes it look like it does.

Have a look here for a Tap size to diameter conversion chart.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Marc said:

It is somewhat counter intuitive but stem diameters and tap sizes don't work that way, it just happens that Tap 9 coincides with 0.9mm which makes it look like it does.

Have a look here for a Tap size to diameter conversion chart.

That has been discussed before and is just messed up. The Esslinger chart you linked has tap 9 being 1mm, who made that chart? is that authoritative? Where do "Tap units" come from? I can live without the answer, I believe one must only use diameter in mm, all the rest is confusing, inconsistent, and can lead to error.

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, jdm said:

The Esslinger chart you linked has tap 9 being 1mm

I hadn't actually noticed that, I just linked to the first conversion chart that came up in a Google search however I was always under the impression that Tap 9 and 0.9mm was the point where the two systems crossed over. It looks like either I have had it wrong all along or Esslinger has got it wrong, ther cousins listing suggests the latter.

But I agree with @jdm in that the simplest and most reliable system would be just to use the metric system.

Further Googlefoo suggests that the concencus is with Esslinger....

Edited by Marc
Additional info
Posted

The Esslinger chart is correct. The weirdness of the sizing comes from the old Martin screwplate norm, where thread diameter gets smaller as the number increases. Somehow in the past this got stuck to stem and crown threads and stayed stuck.

Posted

OK, so I *still* think Cousins must approach this differently.  From a different style of crown, on their site:

image.png.8a61dcbf6c12d33574743b49ed28adbb.png

As you can see, they seem to be associating Tap Size with diameter.  This seems to be why the last one I ordered (which was Tap 7 because I was using the Esslinger chart) was far too small for the stem that I have to fit this in.  Has anybody here ordered from Cousins that can confirm this?  It seems very strange to me to go against the norm.

Posted
1 hour ago, SAK335 said:

Has anybody here ordered from Cousins

I have always bought crowns from Cousins and have never had a problem, but then I have always ignored the tap size number and ordered in metric based on the dimension that I have measured from the stem.

Measure the stem and then order to fit, but use the same unit of measure for both measuring and ordering, that way you can't go wrong.

Posted
3 hours ago, SAK335 said:

It seems very strange to me to go against the norm.

Master nickelsilver has explained above what the good old chart is and from where it comes from. Now in 2022 we can use millimeters instead, the most common, almost universal, stem size is 0.9mm, if you need that just order that, it's written in the description and on the assortment boxes too. If Cousins ships you something that is not as described (very rarely happens) report that and you will be refunded.

c55530_pic1a_cmyk.jpg.af0ce7845437335920d6c8222528f1d5.jpg

 

Posted

OK, now I'm 100% convinced that Cousins is using the metric value as Tap value.  I had ordered a crown for these watches previously using the Esslinger chart, and since 1.2mm = Tap 7 in that chart, I ordered a Tap 7 crown.  I just found that crown and put it on my new Bergeon crown gauge, and it screws perfectly onto the 0.7mm post.

image.png.584251df095a5d76a18cd99f2ff50924.png

Here's the line item from the invoice:

image.png.7b8d6b033c90f9aefd07533f529b2619.png

By that logic I'm ordering a Tap 12 and let's keep our fingers crossed. 

 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...