Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I got asked by a watchmaker friend to have a look at this, he knows zero about electrical stuff and I know a little bit more than that, haha. It runs on a synchronous motor, which had a broken lead. Another friend soldered on new leads for him, but it didn't run; I got it apart and checked everything, back together, and it runs!

 

But, if I check with a voltmeter between one of the leads and the chassis I get around 60 volts, and around 7 on the other lead. Also chassis to ground on the variac (to feed it 120 volts), around 60 volts there too. Checking continuity between the leads and chassis (unplugged) I get nothing, checking the coil out of the piece, nothing from lead to coil case, there should not be any way for these volts to be escaping. Any of you electric gurus have an idea what's happening? I haven't licked my finger and touched the chassis and a water pipe yet but I'm getting tempted...

 

 

 

 

20211106_154233.jpg

20211106_154905.jpg

20211106_155042.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
Posted

The clock isn't earthed is it? It's just the two wires going to the stator. Your high impedance meter might just be picking up mains hum. I'm assuming you're on the ac setting on the meter. Connect one end of your meter to earth and the other touching your finger and you'll get a reading even though there's no real voltage.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

checking the coil out of the piece, nothing from lead to coil case, there should not be any way for these volts to be escaping.

I assume when you're looking for coil continuity you have the resistance range relatively low? Like if you're using a digital meter on the 2K range and the resistance here is really high you're not going to see it. So put the meter on the highest resistance range and see if it detects anything.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's an autoranging meter, so nothing I can change there (there's a Simpson 260 around here somewhere but I trust the digital a little more).

5 minutes ago, Plato said:

The clock isn't earthed is it? It's just the two wires going to the stator. Your high impedance meter might just be picking up mains hum. I'm assuming you're on the ac setting on the meter. Connect one end of your meter to earth and the other touching your finger and you'll get a reading even though there's no real voltage.

No earth, just the two leads.

 

Didn't mention it in the first post, but when I started looking it over I hooked it to the variac, on zero volts, then cranked up to 120- with a hand on the chassis- and got whacked! Checking continuity just after and there was definitely a small short from a lead to chassis. I put new heat shrink and potted the small section of wire still exposed right at the coil with some epoxy; after that it's all clean, zero continuity. But I'm a little gun-shy to touch it plugged in now!

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

there's a Simpson 260 around here somewhere but I trust the digital a little more

OH NO!  Thou doth besmirch the mighty Simpson 260??  In this case the Simpson which (as I recall) 10k ohms/volt will give a much lower impedance to the leads when measuring a voltage and you will likely not experience what @Platodescribed (essentially you are measuring electrostatic potential).  Also use the Simpson to measure the resistance from each lead to case so you dont have to deal with the autoranging meter bouncing about.  I trust the digital meter...dont get me wrong.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

It's an autoranging meter, so nothing I can change there (there's a Simpson 260 around here somewhere but I trust the digital a little more).

No earth, just the two leads.

 

Didn't mention it in the first post, but when I started looking it over I hooked it to the variac, on zero volts, then cranked up to 120- with a hand on the chassis- and got whacked! Checking continuity just after and there was definitely a small short from a lead to chassis. I put new heat shrink and potted the small section of wire still exposed right at the coil with some epoxy; after that it's all clean, zero continuity. But I'm a little gun-shy to touch it plugged in now!

Sounds like you found and fixed the original fault. I don't think we've been allowed to use variacs where I work for donkeys years - no isolation, they're regarded as dangerous!

My guess is that you're just picking up noise on your meter. It's picking up induced voltage like a radio antenna... someone will explain it better than me.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hmm, OK, I'll get out the Simpson and check again. I guess I'll touch it too? It's only 60 volts...

 

Edit- Simpson is at home, I'm at the shop, touched the frame and ground with one hand and nada, not a whiff of anything shocking. Thanks guys!

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Hmm, OK, I'll get out the Simpson and check again. I guess I'll touch it too? It's only 60 volts...

When I was in high school, I began my pursuit of electronics training.  As a sophomore I took a Basic Electronics class and later took two years of vocational radio and TV repair.  On day in the basics class, the teacher was out having a smoke and we had a contest:  who could hold the two leads of a suicide chord plugged into a variac for the highest voltage.  One kid would grab the leads and another would crank the knob.  This was absolutely stupid.  I am sure we all look back at our teen years and wonder how we survived.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

I guess I'll touch it too? It's only 60 volts...

Maybe you can enhance the effect by standing on concrete that's wet with bare feet.

Although I would really prefer you not try the experiment I suspect you might just get one chance to do it and then you leave the group permanently definitely not desirable.

Any idea when the clock was made? Depending upon the age and quality a lot of the wire really isn't the most desirable and the insulation may not be the best.  Also where the wires come out they may be rubbing on things. C can end up with a very high resistance connection to the frame.

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

When I was in high school, I began my pursuit of electronics training.  As a sophomore I took a Basic Electronics class and later took two years of vocational radio and TV repair.  On day in the basics class, the teacher was out having a smoke and we had a contest:  who could hold the two leads of a suicide chord plugged into a variac for the highest voltage.  One kid would grab the leads and another would crank the knob.  This was absolutely stupid.  I am sure we all look back at our teen years and wonder how we survived.

I messed around with some tube gear a few years back, got a good 300v once! Luckily just about 1 second and not across the heart!

 

2 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Maybe you can enhance the effect by standing on concrete that's wet with bare feet.

Although I would really prefer you not try the experiment I suspect you might just get one chance to do it and then you leave the group permanently definitely not desirable.

Any idea when the clock was made? Depending upon the age and quality a lot of the wire really isn't the most desirable and the insulation may not be the best.  Also where the wires come out they may be rubbing on things. C can end up with a very high resistance connection to the frame.

 

 

I'm pretty sure this is from the 60s. There's very very little info on them. I know some of the really old clocks that run on motors are quite sketchy with degraded insulation on the coils; there are some sites that explain how to wind new low voltage coils with modern wire, then you run off a transformer.

 

On this one I added extra insulation around the wire that has the heat shrink on it, where it contacts the coil case and movement- you can see that it gets pinched when it's all mounted.

Posted
2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

But, if I check with a voltmeter between one of the leads and the chassis I get around 60 volts, and around 7 on the other lead.

When dealing with leaks, what matter more than voltage is current. Try measuring it if you are curious. For example, one likely won't feel 10 mA, but 30. yes. BTW, your DMM may have a button for manual range selection. Although you would have noticed if that was the case.

 

1 hour ago, Plato said:

Your high impedance meter might just be picking up mains hum.

Correct. Strange things may happen with cheap DMMs as in seeing voltage decrease, while another meter could reveal the true rms voltage. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...