Jump to content

Old Medana...eratic timekeeper!


Recommended Posts

I guess I was hoping for a simple fix, but you guys are all over this which is brilliant, but it's making me worried that I'll end up with an ornament that doesn't even tick!!

I'm tempted to adjust it for one position and walk around with my arm in the air all day!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RichParker said:

Ok, So my last post was incorrect.

I had best leave it then.

The wheel is a bit wonky isn't it! Maybe it's out of balance? This is all way beyond me and my capabilities tbh.

Not if you have the right tool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would tend to leave well enough alone. Putting a cylinder balance wheel in a truing caliper you going to have issues. If you break the cylinder it's going to be really fun to try to replace that and fun really isn't quite the right word. That's a cast balance wheel it wasn't machined. It probably had some machining but? I was trying to avoid this this is not a real high quality watch if the hands move and keeps time within minutes per day you should be happy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I would tend to leave well enough alone. Putting a cylinder balance wheel in a truing caliper you going to have issues. If you break the cylinder it's going to be really fun to try to replace that and fun really isn't quite the right word. That's a cast balance wheel it wasn't machined. It probably had some machining but? I was trying to avoid this this is not a real high quality watch if the hands move and keeps time within minutes per day you should be happy.

Thanks John, I guess I know my level of 'expertise' and limitations, so I think you're spot on.....I will leave well alone and accept a few minutes. And you're right also in that it doesn't look great quality in truth, so I shouldn't expect too much, especially with its undoubted age and wear.

Cheers guys, great to get your thoughts and to tap into that knowledge. One thing I've learned since I started dabbling and tinkering......this little corner of the world is colossal!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would certainly agree with JohnR regarding the regulator. I have seen these single pin regulators before but only on old cylinder movements, the spring rests on the pin and effectivly shortens/lengthens the spring when the regulator is moved as far as I remember it doesn't  beat  between the pins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

I have seen these single pin regulators before but only on old cylinder movements

This is a more common design than you may think.

Taken from the Timex service manual....

Inked20210319_115149_LI.thumb.jpg.4b61f1074e8cb4e93f83550ba630e1a5.jpg

Edited by Marc
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...