Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think I might have done something stupid.

My 2824-2 was running 20sec fast so I adjusted the micro adjust. I adjusted it A LOT. In fact I probably gave in 2-3 full turns. (I was a wee bit inebriated)

Next day I woke up sober and realized it should have been turned just a smidge.

Have I broken something? It still works fine and after turning the screw back It's still reading +20.

Posted

Hi  Check that the balance spring is clean and non of the coils are sticking,  oil/dirt and are flowing correctly. where is the regulator sitting at the moment, Pictures of the movement would be helpful. The fact its still running is a plus and no serious damage has been done, but you may have inadvertantly got some dirt in watch.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Unless you have compromised the balance spring in some way', depending on which way you turned the adjuster it would either be very fast or very slow. A good clear picture of the movement as is will help with the diagnosis,  you did not slip when doing the adjustment ?...

Posted

I adjusted the micro counter clockwise. It turned back now to were it was originally. 
I'm just wondering if something gets damaged by this? I'm not familiar with how the micro screw affects the hairspring.

The movement is working as I should.

 

Posted

If you're talking about this screw, It's technically not a screw at all, but a pivot with an eccentric head. It can be turned 360° 100 times but the range of adjustment is only in the first 180°.

I doubt 3 turns have done anything other than teach you work on watches before you pop the cork. ? 

 

 

ball2824.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

What he said. The screw is an eccentric, so all you did was waggle the adjustment lever back and forth across its full range. It shouldn't be able to do any damage within that range (I've never tested it, just making an assumption on the engineers' part). I believe the eccentricity is such that it can be closer or further away from the indicating notches on the plate (180° out of phase); you'll want it closer to the notches so as to maximize the utility of said notches and to keep the adjustment as fine as possible. Adjust it correctly, and you'll be in business. I was able to get my lowest spec ETA 2824-2 dialed in to about a quarter second a day, it's way past due for a service, and I'm a relative novice. So aim high.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Thank you! That's what I was hoping for! Never done any work on 2824's so I didnt want to lift the balance out. 

Can you confirm that the screw is positioned the right way(as in not backwards)? The cut in the screw is facing out.

 

Edited by ThomasSand
Posted

Your regulator arm is back at the starting point with every 360degree turn of the micro-adjustor screw. The right position is where you get a good micro-adjustment.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Do you one better (because I can't tell from that photo). Adjust the screw a full revolution (sober), and observe its position relative to the marks. Go slow, and keep an eye on your timegrapher for learning purposes to get a feel for how much goes how far. You'll likely notice that the same degrees rotation with the eccentric closer/further from the indicator marks affects the timing delta differently due to where the eccentric's high/low points are. You've already spun it three times, so any damage done is done (not that I suspect there is any). You'll know for sure (for your own peace of mind if you're anything like me), and you'll learn something valuable in the process. Once you've done this and you're sure everything is where and how it should be, dial it in. Big ol' win all around.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 2
Posted

From an engineering perspective (not watchmaking as a begginner myself) the microscrew looks to be an eccentric cam, your full range of adjustment in that case would be 90° in either direction from central. I would suggest turning screw head to line the slot with the marks on the balance just a fraction at a time.

Graham

  • Like 1
Posted

There's an optimal drink level: enough to get the courage to open up a watch and try something you haven't before, but not enough to compromise your abilities

 

  • Like 1
Posted

For me, this is a single glass of Lagavulin on the bench beside me. Throw a nice album on the turntable, and I can think of no finer way to spend a quiet evening.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

For me, this is a single glass of Lagavulin

Shouldn't that be "slightly less than two glasses"?  ?

  • Like 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With apologies for taking advantage of your kindness in responding, would you be able to indicate what sort of additional info is needed & where on the watch I might find it? Do you have any suggestions as to what Cousins might mean by "a normal  bridle"? ( their website says they can't provide any technical information....)
    • Yeah, it looks exactly like that, but the balance staff pivots was long when fit into the jewels, so I took some  bits shorten it from the bottom pivot but  when  I made the movement run  on all position and all the other position works fine but not on dial up position.  and im not getting any reading from my timegrapher So what do you reckon the issue could be do I need to shorten the bottom pivot more and also a notice the balance rim is really close to the center wheel teeth  feel  it's catching the rim.
    • I don't think there's a risk with UV glue of causing damage. I know a friend of mine frequently reinforces vintage lume with the same lacquer that comes with the modern lume kits and hasn't had any issue with that either. I would personally leave the hole, and drag a layer of UV across the bottom to stabilize what's there.   I really like Loxeal UV glue, the one I keep around (and it is approved by my picky Japanese watchmaker friend) is their UV30-33. I think any name brand, clear UV glue would be fine though.
    • Without knowing what the existing lume is I don't think anyone would be able to answer that. With all things lume related there's a lot of trial and error. I'd avoid anything as harsh as UV and probably just go with Jewellers Cement and leave it to dry naturally.
    • Thanks @RichardHarris123. I really want to avoid a full re-lume at pretty much all costs. I'd rather leave the small hole. My main question really is: which products (which lacquer, which UV glue) is NOT going to chemically alter/damage the current lume?   PS: i've read some old posts of @HectorLooi and @nickelsilver and would be grateful to have their views.
×
×
  • Create New...