Jump to content

balance staff replacement


gary17

Recommended Posts

Hey

I cannot get the safety roller/impulse jewel to fit on the new balance staffs i ordered from balance staff.com. It goes back on the broken staff i removed from a landeron but is to loose to go on the new ones (i bought 3). 

Is there a knack to it. I have even slightly tapped it down with a small hammer hoping it might close it but no luck. I know there are new parts for landeron and the original parts and they do not mix well. But i have seen nothing about the balance staffs being changed.

Is there a solution to this problem?

cheers

gary

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clocsing the hole and perhaps broaching it back to size works, however, would such approach be acceptable for a superlative Rolex too.

Sure the movement would tic, it may even toc, however, bulding a balance complete is increasingly appearing an art to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John raises a good point. I have ordered new staffs but have found them under size. Personally I think closing holes etc carries to many irreversible risks. I normally purchase from balancestaffs .com who give the dimensions of the staff.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, clockboy said:

I have ordered new staffs but have found them under size.

 

3 hours ago, rodabod said:

Remember that sometimes the roller’s hole may have been enlargened.

My experience with aftermarket staffs a lot of times is there deliberately made over size. The watchmakers supposed to reduce them to size to fit. But what if they don't have a lathe or grasp that there are over size?

For instance the I was helping somebody restaffed the Hamilton 992B. There's only one staff it's friction fit. So I was explaining how to put new staff in you should hear a tap tap thump when it's down and all we heard was tapping? It never went down all the way and normally my rule is always measure but why measure staff that only comes in one size? Yes it was oversize. I've had Hamilton 992 B's where the staff doesn't fit because the whole is too big. This means you have to go through all your staffs to see if one might be big enough.

Problem is the components in the escapement really don't like to be stretched or shrunk too much for that matter get away with a little bit but not a lot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also one point is that if you talk about Landeron 48 and other chronos from landeron, they have different versions. 
Besides shock resistance, they come in 3 different variations in no shock resistance. One of them “annulaire”, has thinned part where you fit roller and next 2 varies in diameter of part where hair spring collet sits. 
Patience and accuracy of measurement of disassembled balance is critical, specially in case like Landeron.

Good luck!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...