Jump to content

Friction fit or rubbed in?


Recommended Posts

Could you zoom out a bit. Seeing the rest of the plate and knowing the calibre would help. 

From the photo, it looks like a rubbed in jewel. But it could also rubbed into a brass chaton.

I have replaced rubbed in jewels with a friction fitted ones. It works as long as the pivot hole size is the same and endshake is the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't "zoom out" any further with the thrift store find spencer stereo microscope.  I only have 10x eyepieces and a 3.5x lense.   35x is the best I can do.  The other shots are from the 2x lense on my Galaxy Note 11.  

Turns out, the top balance jewel is cracked as well, and it took me 30 minutes to clean all the caked on dried oil from the jewel sockets.  

 

Here is a pic of the watch

20201120_233223.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it definitely looks like a burnished in jewel. Also looks like it's burnished in the main plate.

6 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I have replaced rubbed in jewels with a friction fitted ones. It works as long as the pivot hole size is the same and endshake is the same

ideally you should have special jewel to be burnished in as there may not be enough metal to hold the straight sided jewel which is typically the type that would friction in. If you have access to a watchmaker's lathe you can modify the modern jewel by changing its outer shape so that it becomes a burnished in jewel. otherwise you just use the modern jewel wings set open up the hole and use a friction jewel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One-dip or naphtha should be safe, but are you sure it isn't magnetized?  I would also check that.  Although, if that balance is from an Elgin 760 0r 761, I would think it would have a hairspring of non-magnetic alloy.
    • Hi, Is there a spell check function available when you are posting ? Regards CJ
    • Hi John I just did a Seiko Lord-Matic a front loader without a split stem, I used a crystal lift to remove it, although I had to have it that tight I though I was going to break the lift before the crystal would budge. So I decided that the press would be a better option as I think crystals with tension rings resist a lot of compressing. I used a crystal press to repalce it and the bezel with no issues, obviuosly a different watch to the Omega. I just took my time and kept inspecting the installation progress bit by bit Regards CJ
    • Hello All, I’m replacing the crystal in an Omega Dynamic, # 165.039, which houses a cal 552, installed through the front of the case. The replacement Sterncreuz crystal is, like the original, with tension ring. I removed the crystal using a compressed air technique to pop it out.  (I have a crystal lift, but I’m always fearful of marking the crystal edges and so avoid using it as much as possible). Now to the replacement -  any tips on putting the crystal back in?  Am I obliged to using my dreaded crystal lift to complete the task, or how about a crystal press?  I’ve put lots of crystals in using a press, but never with the movement in the watch. The thought of using one with a front-loader makes me very nervous, with the fully assembled watch sitting under the press. How would more experienced folks proceed here? Any advice, gratefully received… John Down Under…
    • No thats straight out of the watch as i found it the balance wheel is almost as bad. I've never seen so much material removed.
×
×
  • Create New...