Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'll start.  But first, the backstory: what I didn't know beforehand was that one of my daughters "borrowed" my *brass* tweezers to apply some stickers, and put them back before I knew about it. I found that out later.

So there I am, bit of sinus trouble making me groggy, working on a practice movement to take my mind off it.  I'm unscrewing the balance bridge, and I go to grab the screw with the tweezers and put it in my tray. I hold it over the tray and let go, but it stays on the tweezer tip.  I think "That's not good".  So I put the screw and the tweezers on my demagnetizer and hit the switch. I lift the screw and drop it in the tray. And as I watch myself lifting *brass* tweezers off a demagnetizer, I realize how tired I am and go to bed (resolving to figure out why the screw stuck sometime later).

Anyone else have a funny watch repair-related story to tell?

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Edited for misspelling
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

And as I watch myself lifting *brass* tweezers off a demagnetizer, I realize how tired I am and go to bed (resolving to figure out why the screw stuck sometime later).

Science is demonstrated by experiments, so nothing is wrong repeating these sometime. The other day I found that my brass tweezers reject small screws, even after being demagnetized (the tweezers). I only went far enough to learn that brass is not actually totally amagnetic, did not try to demag the screws and just moved on.

  • Like 1
Posted

I gave a used quartz watch to our houseman, couple of days and he comes complaining he doesn't want it for it looses time dispite him winding it everyday.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I haven't posted in a bit so:

The LCD wristwatch was a new thing.  When was that?  '79, '80, not really certain.  I purchased my first one, a Seiko in '81.  Lifetime ago...  I was pulling night watch on the fall back from daylight saving time to standard.  Remember the rules said to set it back at 0200.

It was 0300 when I heard a shout from the desk sergeant who proclaimed his watch had died.  I look at it and saw the 00:00 on the display.  It seems he did not know how to set the watch so at 0200 took the back off and removed the cell for an hour then put it back in thinking the timepiece would stop for an hour and then display the correct time.

Armitron as I recall.  I bailed him out, of course.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

It's not a story of repairing, and its not a watch but a clock! Tried to escape from me, but I caught it, to make my life more difficult it tried to disappear in pieces. We had heavy wind today and my clock was placed on the window sill, seems it teamed up with the curtain and with a little help it went trough the window. I managed to collect every piece with the help of a ladder and even though the case suffered a bit it is still going. ? ?

  • Sad 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Thanks again, my daughters.  So apparently one of my daughters has a little prism-like kaleidoscope toy, which gives one "insect vision", and also looks a heck of a lot like my black loupe.  So guess where she leaves it laying about, just for giggles.
If you guessed "On my workbench", you win the prize.  Sat down to look into works of another daughter's little quartz watch, took off the back, grabbed the loupe, and saw about TWENTY BATTERIES back there!!!  Recoiled a little, and looked at the "loupe" and had to laugh.  Yep, she got me good.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you @JohnR725 and @Nucejoe for the reference links, I'll make sure to check the ebauche symbols next time before asking.  @praezis I get your point about swapping parts. I haven't done a balance staff replacement and really should learn if I want to get better at this.
    • Balance complete - Spring and wheel . The staff was replaced by a local watchmaker and he bent the harispring. 
    • Dr ranfft sees no difference between venus 180, 181 & 182, and  other calibs of same family are highly likely to  fit. @donutdan  Go on to the link below to see all related calibs, of all them you might find one to buy. https://ranfft.org/caliber/10591-Venus-180  A venus movement  is a terrible thing to deprive of TLC. Good luck   
    • Hi John, I didn‘t adress you or your statement, just grabbed a fitting quote 🙂. Maybe it‘s me, but always getting a bit nervous reading about „parts swapping“. How often did we read here that swapping back and forth didn’t help? Why not try to advance with someone‘s skill and do repair. Frank
    • Yet another Rolex has landed on my bench — this time a Sea-Dweller, ref. 16600, equipped with the trusty calibre 3135, the same calibre as the last one I worked on. The time and date settings are completely dead. I guess the yoke has slipped out of engagement with the sliding pinion. It remains to be investigated. If that is the case, it certainly makes you wonder how it can occur, considering the outstanding quality of these movements. Perhaps it was subjected to trauma? Perhaps a sloppy assembly of the keyless works? However, it is running very well. A you can see, the maximum delta is seven seconds. The maximum acceptable delta for this movement, as specified by Rolex, is 10 seconds. The average rate fully wound in five positions (crown down, left, up, dial up, and dial down) is 1.8 seconds per day. The rate tolerance as specified by Rolex is -2/+4 s/d. So it's all looking pretty perfect. What's very strange, though, and something I can't get my head around, is that the first time I measured it on my timing machine, fully wound (I could hear the mainspring slip in small steps while being wound), it performed quite poorly. The rates and beat errors were fine, but the horizontal amplitudes were around 235°, and the vertical amplitudes were all below 200°, which is the minimum amplitude as specified by Rolex after 24h. Performing that poorly, being fully wound, I felt it wasn't much use to measure it again after 24h. However, to be thorough, I nevertheless did and to my astonishment, I got the results as seen in the table above - "Fully wound minus 24h (Not Serviced)" - At that point, I decided to give the watch another full wind and take another measurement, and I got the results as seen in the above table - "Fully wound (Not Serviced)". If anyone has any idea about why I got such a poor performance the first time around, please let me know! As can be seen, the oil beneath the cap jewel is noticeably depleting. If it wasn't for the faulty date and time setting, I think this amazing watch could have been left alone for another year or two, but considering it has to be repaired, why not service it as well? Especially considering the funny behaviour in amplitude I described in the previous paragraph. What do you think? All opinions are appreciated, but if one of our much-appreciated pros, such as  @Jon, @JohnR725, @nickelsilver, or @nevenbekriev could weigh in, I'm sure it would be appreciated by many. The fit between the bracelet ends and the lugs was very tight, and I couldn't get the bracelet out by simply pressing the spring bar from one side through the drilled lugs. I'm sure there's an original Rolex tool for it unavailable to enthusiasts, and even so would cost a small fortune. During the years, I've bought a small fortune worth of tools. Some of those tools have been a complete disappointment and a waste of money, such as the spring bar tool in the picture, which I've never used and have been meaning to resell for a long time. However, as I couldn't get the bracelet out, I came to think of it, and cut myself two pieces of brass rod, deburred and polished the ends, bent them and inserted them in the tool. It worked like a charm. I’ve got to say, I’m kind of proud of this little bit of brilliance. If I’d read something like this when I was just starting, eight or nine years ago, I would’ve been super impressed. Especially considering I could barely tell which end of a screwdriver to use back then. Okay, maybe I’m exaggerating a bit, but you get the gist! I just hate it when you can't unscrew the case back by using a rubber ball. Is it really necessary to screw the case back on so hard? It's a sincere question. Maybe it is necessary for a true diver's watch like this Sea-Dweller. Fortunately, I had the right size, a number five Rolex die in my set. Getting the case back off, I had to bring out the "Big Gun". Even so, I had to apply what felt like an insane amount of force. I actually worried the tool might break, and it was not a pleasant experience. So, two thumbs down for the previous repairer, who... ...also decided it was necessary to scratch up the inside of the case back lid, which likely halves its market value. I wouldn't be surprised if the same guy caused the setting problems by being sloppy while assembling the keyless works. We shall see! I’m really looking forward to hearing your thoughts on my questions and musings!
×
×
  • Create New...