Jump to content

Help removing movement from case


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to remove a valjoux 7750 from a Maurice Lacroix MP 6348 and I believe it is accessed from the front of the watch.

The crown and stem are removed and the two retaining screws are out, the dial and movement rotate freely but the movement won't release.

One of the sub dial hands has come away so I'm trying to take the hand out to avoid dial damage.

Does anyone have experience with this or these watches? I know there are bezel removal tools from bergeon etc but wasn't sure if those worked on stationary bezels.

Thanks to anyone that has some insight.

IMG_20200828_091931.jpg

IMG_20200828_091956.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far as I know this is the type of bezel remover you need to use for that style bezel. I bought one of these to help remove rotating dive bezels (on the advice of someone) and my experience is it is poorly suited to that task, but I think it would be perfect for what you're trying to do.

I've never needed to remove a friction bezel and these pictures are from the Internet.

bezelRemover.jpg.b9d44a4586c10deb627b55c32ff29abe.jpg

removeFrictionBezel.jpg.0e8e0ca3c702835a6ec338cd197885e9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

have you removed the bezel?  put the stem back in until the bezel is off,   if it did not go in,  you have a "dial off situation".  good luck.  vin

Haven't removed the bezel yet. The keyless works needs rebuilding as the stem won't go back in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianB said:

So far as I know this is the type of bezel remover you need to use for that style bezel. I bought one of these to help remove rotating dive bezels (on the advice of someone) and my experience is it is poorly suited to that task, but I think it would be perfect for what you're trying to do.

I've never needed to remove a friction bezel and these pictures are from the Internet.

bezelRemover.jpg.b9d44a4586c10deb627b55c32ff29abe.jpg

removeFrictionBezel.jpg.0e8e0ca3c702835a6ec338cd197885e9.jpg

This is the tool I thought it would need, will try and get hold of one, thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The device BrianB pictured will work well enough on a stationary dial as well as the rotary version, C case knife under the bezel lip and twist will bring it off. Hold the watch in a cloth and be careful not to mark the case side. There is sometimes a small notch for the knife so have a good look round the case sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  The device BrianB pictured will work well enough on a stationary dial as well as the rotary version, C case knife under the bezel lip and twist will bring it off. Hold the watch in a cloth and be careful not to mark the case side. There is sometimes a small notch for the knife so have a good look round the case sides.

I've had a look through a loupe and can't see any notches. I can't work out if the bezel removes from the lip or below that where there appears to be a seam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  The device BrianB pictured will work well enough on a stationary dial as well as the rotary version, C case knife under the bezel lip and twist will bring it off. Hold the watch in a cloth and be careful not to mark the case side. There is sometimes a small notch for the knife so have a good look round the case sides.

Just tried with a case knife with a fair amount of force and there was zero give at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Removing bezels can be problematic if you encounter a tight one. I do own the tool suggested but it can be too brutal and if not careful ( From bitter experience) it can distort the bezel. I use a vintage butter knife. It is sharp enough to get under the bezel but being flexible you can feel the tension being applied.

However the movement should be removable without removing the bezel. Looking at the pics I would say it is a friction fitted case back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Removing bezels can be problematic if you encounter a tight one. I do own the tool suggested but it can be too brutal and if not careful ( From bitter experience) it can distort the bezel. I use a vintage butter knife. It is sharp enough to get under the bezel but being flexible you can feel the tension being applied.

However the movement should be removable without removing the bezel. Looking at the pics I would say it is a friction fitted case back

The case back is screw down, I've removed this, taken the stem out and undone the two screws that hold the movement to movement ring. The movement ring doesn't budge, it's part of the actual case, I didn't think the movement and dial could come out if the movement ring is fixed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok agree looking at the pics it does not have a traditional bezel. However the movement and dial should come out unless the dial has a lip. If so then the surrounding bezel will have to be removed, Cristal removed then the movement will come out from the front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi   Just a thought  the bezel could be screwed on, try using a sticky ball to unscrew it.

You're an absolute genius! Never would I have thought it would be a screw down bezel. Put it upside down in a movement holder that grabbed exactly where the bezel inverts and viola! Thank you so much

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s how the original Oyster case worked.  Those “flashy” knurled bezels, they continue to use, used to fit a tool to unscrew the bezel just like the case back. 
 

This is the first I’ve heard of it outside Rolex. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Panerai continued that case assembly method after Rolex stopped using it. No idea if the modern ones still do. I believe they were using Rolex pocket watch movements as well. 
 

Ive never handled a Panerai, so I can’t say more about dealing with them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, let me try and expand on why I think this is right (but maybe misleading at the same time). Wikipedia has a good explanation of surface tension, which is where I got most of the ideas below. The cohesion of the liquid molecules binds them together into the most compact form possible. If there are no external forces acting, this is a sphere. Surface tension is the combined effect of the cohesion between molecules on the surface with others on the surface, as well as the cohesion to molecules just under the surface, causing contraction and the formation of a denser "skin". The way a droplet of a liquid forms on a solid surface is determined by the strength of this cohesive force relative to the adhesive force between the liquid molecules and the surface material. If cohesion >> adhesion, you get a droplet. If cohesion is similar to adhesion, the liquid tends to spread out on the surface and creep away from its original location. Oil doesn't have the same high surface tension that water does, so it is not going to form a really rounded droplet on any surface in the way that water will "bead" on wax. This is where my earlier statement is misleading, but it is still exactly the same principles at work. Drops of oil on an epilamed surface are not going to run off in all directions at the lightest provocation. What the epilame does, I think, is reduce the adhesive force to the surface somewhat, making the weak cohesive force of the oil molecules more effective. The result is less tendency of the oil to spread out and creep, and more tendency to stick together as a cohesive mass. I don't think epilame has any effect on surface tension. That is a property of the liquid and is determined solely by the cohesive forces between the liquid molecules. I also don't think the epilame makes the liquid "stick" to where it is applied. The oil adheres ("sticks") more strongly to a non-treated surface than to a surface treated with epilame. This is why the epilame needs to be removed from the contact surfaces by running dry for a short period. The oil then sticks more readily to the local contact surfaces, where the epilame layer is worn away, than to the surrounding area. The oil sticks together, and is thereby anchored in place as a single body. Interestingly, reducing the adhesion of the oil to the solid surfaces will also reduce capillary action, which is what we rely on if we don't use epilame. Another reason to make sure the epilame is worn away from the spot you want the oil to stay put.    
    • Look up index vs free sprung balances.  The screws are for timing. 
    • I was considering just building a watch from scratch, I've heard the nh35 movements have a lot of case and dial choices and apparently they run poorly when you buy them new so a good service is required. But honestly building a watch like that doesn't interest me. I love fixing things. There's nothing more satisfying to me than taking something broken and making it work again. Plus watches are cool 😎 and easier to store than a car engine! I only had one engine in the dining room and my wife complained. Hopefully the watches will go unnoticed.
    • Hi all, My "practice" watch has a worn our balance pivot, so I ordered a balance complete. Pieces nr 4871 for Unitas 6310. It's probably no big deal, but my original balance wheel has plenty of screws or similar protruding all around, while the new one I got doesn't. What's the purpose of these thingies? I haven't installed it yet, maybe next week. Thanks
    • For those of you who are looking for a Seitz jewel gauge, I just want to make you aware that there may be a good opportunity right now at Tradera.com (Swedish eBay). The site has significantly fewer visitors than eBay and I have made several fantastic deals there. 1500 SEK corresponds to approx. £110/€128/$137 https://www.tradera.com/item/1922/631487681/seitz-urmakarverktyg-matare Just to make sure, I'm not associated with this listing in any way!  
×
×
  • Create New...