Jump to content

Fusee Clock keeping poor time


4ster

Recommended Posts

I have a late 19th century fusee mantle clock that keeps poor time. If fully wound-up it will lose around 5 minutes over the first couple of days before slowly regaining this time after around day four and then ending up about 5 minutes fast by the end of the week. For the size of the plates (5.5" x 4") and compared to other fusee's I have, the spring appears particularly strong and results in a substantial tick from the escapement. I suspect that the spring gauge is too thick and that I will need to fit a lighter spring. Does anyone recognize these symptoms and is there any other explanation for this type of activity in a fusee movement?

The pendulum is homemade and weighs 250 grams (perhaps a little heavy), could the weight have anything to do with this. The fusee appears typical and has a standard sized barrel about 55mm diameter & 42mm deep. I have not removed the spring from the barrel and don't know its gauge, but should this be in the region of 0.4mm?

a1.jpg

a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me the clock needs a good clean and as clockboy has said worn holes and pivots could also be worn. The reason the fusee was invented was to counter act for the un-even thickness of the mainsprings, back in the old days it was not possible to manufacture springs of equal thickness from end to end. The fusee counteracts against that problem. The spring might also be at fault as well in your clock. It could be tired or a lack of oil or sticky with grease.  The best thing is it needs to be looked at before any more wear causes more damage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rodabod said:

How large is the pendulum swing? It could be partly related to excessive amplitude (circular error and lots of recoil).

If the movement is worn such as bad holes and poor pivots, that will cause power to be lost, that will effect the swing of the pendulum, also worn escape teeth and pallets. The recoil will be very poor due to power lose it will not increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I queried the amplitude as the OP suggested that the mainspring seemed like it may be on the strong side. 
 

Worth mentioning also to the OP that a “substantial tick”  an sometimes be a sign of excessive drop as the escape wheel accelerates when it gets given the chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, my first time on the forum, thanks for the immediate responses and all the advice.

I picked this movement up on ebay a couple of years ago to fit in the first clock case I built some 45 years ago and to replace the old Perivale movement I had found at that time. It was short of gut, suspension and pendulum but seemed in remarkably good condition. There is virtually no sign of wear on the pinions and the bushes look original and nicely round. I was delighted, and once I new the pendulum length would fit in the case, the movement had a strip-down and a session in the ultrasonic bath, a polish of the pivots and holes and a little oil. Then it was in the case and on the bench for setting up. It was at this stage I realized that time keeping was inconsistent; running slow when fully wound, then faster as the spring wound down. At the extremes this is several minutes a day.

At the time the tension in the spring gave me concern. The torque required to turn the seemed excessive such that if it had a fusee chain I would be reluctant to wind it. Felling that this may be the issue I tried varying the spring pre-tension between nothing an around 3 full turns, but the time keeping seemed much the same. I have also substituted the pendulum with one having a bob of 145g  again with no improvement. At this time the next project came along and its sat on the self in the workshop ever since awaiting some inspiration. 

I have just taken a look at the swing which is 23mm at 135mm from the pivot point, by my reckoning this is near enough 5 degrees either side of center.

I'm just  at a bit of a loss as I have never encountered anything like this with a fusee. As you say, the whole reason for it was to overcome variation in torque as the spring wound down. Think it may be time to take it apart again and take a closer look. I suppose I was hoping that someone may confirm that excessive spring tension can totally mess-up the equalizing action of the fusee cone!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I can see the escape wheel teeth look dry, I can't see the pallet faces, so I can't see if they are worn. The movement sounds about right and in beat, it does look a little shallow. Time keeping on a fusee  should be spot on, they are extremely good time keepers, no more then a minute a week. Escape wheel teeth look fine no sign of bad wear, and if the pallet faces and holes and pivots are good. It will be all down to the main spring. The tension should be so, that you cannot move the line on the barrel when the movement has run down, if so this will cause the line to be out of line when it comes to winding the clock up, it will not wind easy onto the fusee. I would change that line to the nylon type, they do not mark the barrel or unravel. The type you have can unravel and cause damage. Pendulums for fusee movements included.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/pendulums-english-dial-fusee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a picture of the back plate of the clock one or two things make me think this is a English Williamson movement, I had one recently  that had a number of problems, the thing I noticed about that clock was the movement was of compact design with a strong spring and substantial chain, large pendulum with short suspension, beat correction on the crutch and a tick that could wake the dead once cased up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 4ster said:

Sorry. I got the swing of the pendulum wrong. Its swinging through 25mm at 210mm from the pivot; about 3.5 degrees either side of center

Was that on a full wind?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4ster said:

Pendulum swing was measured with just two winds onto the fusee cone. I'll try measuring it at the start, mid point and fully wound.

It shouldn't make any difference to the swing of the pendulum if you only have little power or if its on a full wind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

It shouldn't make any difference to the swing of the pendulum if you only have little power or if its on a full wind. 

In an ideal world, yes, the swing would be consistent. But this clock has largely varying rate according to state of wind, hence why I was asking questions regarding the swing of the pendulum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The clock movement is of H.Williamsons production, very nice movements the rear blued screws recessed into brass collets, its probably from the Salisbury factory so would date to 1903 to 1909 sometimes marked with Salisbury within a Key trademark, the factory burnt down in 1909 and production was moved to Coventry and these are stamped the same but with Coventry within a key the Coventry movements do not have the blued screws recessed into the collets.

I'm pretty sure yours would have originally had a chain and not a wire as the cone grove appears to be flat bottomed, Williamson did make wire fusee's but these where sold under the "Empire" brand of clocks.

This is a photo from the ebay listing of the clock I bought:

1624476574_s-l1600(2).thumb.jpg.0e1b499478e4c62f506244968276f038.jpg

The pendulum on mine is the original, Williamson worked hard to standardise parts in their clock production and had just tooled up and spent a lot of money to upgrade the Salisbury factory, only for it all to be destroyed by fire, they where also under insured and could not afford to rebuild so moved production to their Coventry factory.

The problems with the clock above where one bent tooth and a chipped tooth on the escape wheel, the anchor had very slight wear and needed to be polished to a absolute mirror finish, the spring is on the strong side and the chain is very robust on these clocks, I put half a turn of pre tension on the clock enough to make the chain taut, it runs like a steam train and is very loud compared to any other clock I have, it runs slow to about 1 minute a week so they are very capable time keepers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4ster said:

Pendulum swing was measured with just two winds onto the fusee cone. I'll try measuring it at the start, mid point and fully wound.

I think this would be a good idea as it's easy enough to do. From your video, the drop did not look excessive. And there was not significant recoil. I'd be interested to see if the amplitude of the pendulum increases, or if there is noticeably more recoil when fully wound.

Even with a fusee in place to counteract the properties of a mainspring, it is only designed to counteract the properties of a given mainspring. At either end of the curve (fully wound or fully unwound) the curve becomes more exponential, so this would be very much exacerbated if an incorrect strength was used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wls1971,  thanks so much for the information and history on the movement, really fascinating. You are right the movement should have a chain, I just didn't want to go to the expense at the time.

rodabod & oldhippy,

More on the pendulum swing. I measured the swing at three stages of winding: 1, 7 & 14 turns on to the fusee cone.

Unwound 1 turn, swing = 36mm

Half wound 7 turns, swing = 32mm

full wound 14 turns, swing = 30mm

Sure looks like the cone does not match and equalize the properties of the spring

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just taken a took at the escapement now the movement is near fully wound. As you can see from the video clip the is now very little recoil and less energy in the movement. Think I need to let it run down and take a look at just what type of spring is inside.

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angle the watch had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
    • Drilling is going to be difficult, firstly because the drill bits are so thin and brittle, expect to break a few. The second issue is access to the 'hole', as the other lug will be in the way, meaning that you will have to drill at a slight angle, putting a bending stress on the drill bit and with the slightest drop in concentration .... and back to my first point. I would be tempted to grind them flat with a Dremel type tool or small jewelers file, and then put a center punch in the center of the bit to be drilled so the drill bit doesn't skip around and break... but expect this to be slow and frustrating work. By the time you have done 4 of these you'll be an expert and can come back and tell us all the best way to do it if you go down this route. However, I would seriously consider What @watchweasol said and drill from the outside-in, this will ensure straight holes without having to work around the other lugs. It may be worthwhile making yourself a simple paper template so you can be sure to match the position of each hole before drilling. In the end you will be left with 4 holes on the outside of the lugs, but many cases are made this way and unless you are looking for it you probably won't notice or realise that it's not the way the watch was meant to be in the first place.
    • What works for me (waiting for the villagers to assemble with torches and pitchforks) is to put a liberal (in watch terms) spot of 9010 on one of the pins of the pin pallet, this seems to improve amplitude and beat error.
    • Non-magnetic is a poor description of such a hairspring. A better description would be unmagnetisable hairspring. There are metals and alloys that are attracted to magnets, but don’t become magnetised themselves. A hairspring made out such a material will be attracted to magnetised tweezers, but will not become magnetised. These hairsprings can be disrupted by being in close proximity to a magnet, but the disruption will cease the moment the magnet is moved away. These are hairsprings that could conceivably be disrupted by a magnetised hairspring stud. Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...