Jump to content

Brac 117 Mainspring Barrel looks odd


Recommended Posts

Hi all. Working on my favourite type vintage watch, an old pin pellet - I just love the sound they make. A friend of mine said I sound like I’ve got a bomb strapped to my wrist when wearing one! [emoji51]

 

Anyway, this one is a Brac 117, which is an automatic. When I opened up the barrel, I found that the mainspring was tethered in place by a pin, which judging by the file marks and quality of the brazing I feel this is a bit of bodgeneering retrospectively carried out for one reason or other. The quality of the job aside, aren’t automatics supposed to have a bridle on the end of the mainspring to allow it to grip the barrel internal diameter and break away smoothly when fully wound?

 

Let’s see some pictures to clarify my above rantings

 

3553bf6c6d6ddc95641527a166c8df3f.jpg

 

 

016cb7afba215f293c9fada807a07601.jpg

206b14bf1b7d95f4776e19db81ed075e.jpg

 

What are your thoughts please? Has it been bodged, or is it supposed to be crudely pinned like that?

 

Kind regards

Deggsie

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love seeing a bit of bodgery... Just when I think I've seen it all, something even more mind blowing turns up!

I agree with the others, the very nature of an automatic is for the mainspring to slip, so as not to put ridiculous torque and pressure on reduction/reversing wheels, which would be unable to move once this spring is fully wound. In fact, the rotor surely wouldn't move once it was at full wind.

Thanks for showing us it Deggsie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amazing thing to me is this was a difficult bodge/fix when a new mainspring and or barrel would have been the best route and maybe easier. I admire the watchmaker that did this because it is a skill I bet he/she has employed before and maybe many times before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidMasters said:

The amazing thing to me is this was a difficult bodge/fix when a new mainspring and or barrel would have been the best route and maybe easier. I admire the watchmaker that did this because it is a skill I bet he/she has employed before and maybe many times before.

I know the place they do this. Seen lots of watches coming from the same place or country . Glue and paper and all sorts of bodges and tricks to make a watch run just enough to make it sell . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your quick responses gentlemen . You all seem to concur that it’s a repair of sorts, which seems logical, and I agree David it was quite a difficult fix in lieu of swapping the spring/barrel. When fully wound, the rotor did indeed lock up. I will try to research the correct spring but if anyone has the specification I’d be grateful. Thanks all and keep safe. Kind regards, Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for finding this. It’s very overpriced and as I’m in the Uk the freight charge also tops it out as prohibitive. When I look closely some parts are missing so it may be out of the frying pan and into the fire if I buy this. Most of my watches are only a few pounds, that way if I break it I’m not too upset. That said, a watch for £3-£5 is usually in need of plenty of talc and so it pushes me to learn more

Stay safe and thanks for suggesting the movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
    • Any other thoughts on how I can get a replacement coil? Any “hidden” or unknown physical shops (in Australia or elsewhere) that might have them in stock (but not always online)?
×
×
  • Create New...