Jump to content

H/S centering problem


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Struggling with a h/s problem that I can’t get my head around.

 

The movement is a Tavannes 38 that belongs to an old (30’s?) art deco tank watch. I have serviced the movement and at first (well after some tinkering in the h/s area) it ran beautifully with good amplitude and nice straight lines on the timegrapher.

 

But then it started to behave weird, speeding heavily and stopping.

 

I had noticed that the first h/s turn outside the regulator runs very close to the regulator pin and this is where I had pushed and pulled a bit to get it to run free. Which apparently worked for a while....

 

Removing the h/s from the balance wheel and mounting it back on the bridge, I seem to find that the h/s (in my eyes) looks quite decent with overall evenly spaced turns etc.

 

But the collet is clearly offset and centering it will inevitably push the turns tighter and closer to the regulator pin.

 

With my limited h/s adjustment experience, I can’t see a way to move the collet to the correct position without, in some way, influencing the overall h/s shape and possibly create unwanted touching between h/s turns or the regulator pin.

 

A photo is attached. I hope it makes sense to explain my problem.

 

2bf6d476198bcaea8838c519f078cf86.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi as mentioned the B/s is not right , The spring between the regulator and the stud is a little out of concentricity,  The arc should allow the regulator to move round without touching the spring and be centered between the pins. If you move the regulator towards the stud the collet will move from the center. Ideally you want the collet centered and the reglator moving towards the stud without moving the spring..   easier said than done.  Take your time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for feedback.

I have tried to alter the shape from the stud towards regulator to move the collet more towards center. And as such it works...but since anything I do close to the h/s circumference also move the entire h/s and ending with that first turn outside the regulator to move against the reg pin. It’s as if I should really need to only move the collet without touching any of the other h/s turn positions. Not possible, I guess.

To me it feels like the h/s is overall a tiny bit too large diameter to fit the three points; center, regulator and stud.

Sigh....







Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bsoderling said:

To me it feels like the h/s is overall a tiny bit too large diameter to fit the three points; center, regulator and stud.

Exactly.
If the collet is centered, the spring will touch the regulator pin. Probably this hairspring was changed in the past.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Probably this hairspring was changed in the past.



The thought has struck me as well that this may be the case.

I will try some more, maybe there’s a compromize that works?

And I was also thinking that maybe I can find a regulator from a scrap movement with a slightly longer distance from center to reg pin that offer a tiny bit more space for the first h/s turn?

Any comments to that idea?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again,

Running out of ideas, I decided to try a somewhat counterintuitive approach.

With the main trouble being the h/s touching the reg pin from the outside, I decided to remedy that to start.

I slightly straightened the h/s right across from the stud i.e. Moving the entire h/s in the ”wrong” direction and effectively increasing the error between collet and jewel hole.

What then happens when ”forcing” the collet to be over the jewel hole is that the hairspring gets a bit distorted with tighter turns on the regulator side.

But....the error introduced by the straightening gets spread out over many h/s turns and there’s still space between the spring and the the reg pin.

Looks a bit ugly but runs very well again and hopefully interesting for some h/s nerds out there.






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Thank you!   Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess. What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.
    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that. When cohesive forces within a liquid are stronger than the adhesive forces of a surface then surface tension is high causing the liquid to bead up. So  an applied epilame coating reduces the adhesive force of a surface inhibiting a fluid to wet the surface. So i guess no epilame cannot both repel and attract . If something is keeping the oil in place on top of an epilamed surface then there must be another reason for that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
×
×
  • Create New...