Jump to content

Good Sunday evening, everyone


ITProDad

Recommended Posts

I just finished servicing an 1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch. It was filthy. Came out great except for two things. It’s running 300+ seconds fast at the slowest setting. No problem, I can add timing washers. However my timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees. My slow-mo video shows a healthy 300+ degrees rotation. Any ideas why the timegrapher would show such a large difference from the visual check?

 

The performance is very similar in dial up & down and crown up positions. I’m stumped. The timegrapher is new and has appeared accurate on other watches.

 

Regards and thank you!!

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would help if we could see a picture of the timing machine results. Then preferably two positions would be nice at a minimum. One of the dial positions and crown up because it's a pocket watch.  

Then a picture of the balance wheel would be nice preferably when it's not running so we can see what it looks like.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is quite an informative document in general if you have a timegrapher: https://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Witschi Training Course.pdf

Given that the amplitude is calculated by the machine as "the time between the first pulse and the third pulse of the beat noise" could there be something that is causing an unexpected noise in between that is causing the timegrapher to throw up its wrong calculation? It's perhaps notable that the machine's calculation and your observation are a factor of two out (152 vs 300+).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a suggestion to make sure that you are comparing apples with apples....

The amplitude reported by the Timgrapher is the rotation angle between the resting position of the balance when there is no power on the mainspring (with the impulse jewel sitting between the horns of the pallet fork) and either one of the extremes of rotation (the point at which it reverses direction). The total angle of rotation (extreme clockwise point, through the pallet fork, and then out to extreme anticlockwise point) is double the amplitude.

I mention this just in case you are looking at the slow mo video and comparing the total angle of rotation with the Timegrapher results, which would result in discrepancy by a factor of 2.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there...

Just a couple of thoughts for you. Check you have not accidently placed any oil on the balance spring, check its not magnetised and check (you said it was filthy) there is not some residue or gunk after cleaning that is causing the spring coils to stick...any of these things will cause that massive +300/day issue. If you can look at the action under magnification, you should be able to pick up such an abnormality.

Cheers

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a suggestion to make sure that you are comparing apples with apples....
The amplitude reported by the Timgrapher is the rotation angle between the resting position of the balance when there is no power on the mainspring (with the impulse jewel sitting between the horns of the pallet fork) and either one of the extremes of rotation (the point at which it reverses direction). The total angle of rotation (extreme clockwise point, through the pallet fork, and then out to extreme anticlockwise point) is double the amplitude.
I mention this just in case you are looking at the slow mo video and comparing the total angle of rotation with the Timegrapher results, which would result in discrepancy by a factor of 2.


I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ITProDad said:

I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?

 

Because they are OK in balance pivot, escapement, and mainspring, while your P/W it is not. We no way to know why ,you can read many threads about "reduced amplitude", hope you can find out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ITProDad said:

I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?

As JDM alludes to in his response, a movement in good order from the mainspring through to the escapement should reasonably be expected to have an amplitude of between about 270 and 300 degrees unless designed otherwise, the highest that I've seen has been about 320 but this is not common (talking here about Swiss lever type escapements, not sure how this might vary with English lever or cylinder escapements). This means that the total angle of rotation between the two extremes of swing will be in the order of 540 to 600 degrees. Theoretically it is possible for the amplitude to be as high as perhaps 355 degrees before the impulse pin crashes into the outside of the pallet fork, however this is undesirable as amplitude can be affected by  movement of the watch during use; a watch with an amplitude of 355 on the timing machine could well find that a quick twist of the wrist has the balance crashing against the wrong side of the pallet fork with potential for damage.

If your Timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees (assuming that you have the correct lift angle set for the movement under test) then that would indicate a problem with the movement. It might also explain why the rate is so high as at very low amplitudes the rate can increase considerably.

To improve things you are going to have to go back in and do some trouble shooting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Marc. I had not considered the relationship between a low (and fast) amplitude increasing the beat rate. Makes perfect sense! I’ve simply not run into that occurrence. I will take a look at the amplitude more closely before I add timing weights or washers. The hairspring looks to have been re-pinned as it has near a centimeter of “extra” length beyond the stud. Perhaps I’ll consider re-pinning the stud and lengthening the hairspring. Of course I’ll need to adjust the collet for beat error, but it might be the most appropriate fix.

I genuinely appreciate everyone’s input! Thank you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Marc and JDM!
I was misinterpreting what the amplitude means. I was looking at the rotation of the balance wheel with the tic and too extremes. Not per beat.

Thank you for the welcome lesson in understanding one more facet of my love of mechanical watches. Sincere thanks!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/22/2019 at 4:46 PM, ITProDad said:

I just finished servicing an 1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch. It was filthy. Came out great except for two things. It’s running 300+ seconds fast at the slowest setting. No problem, I can add timing washers. However my timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees. My slow-mo video shows a healthy 300+ degrees rotation. Any ideas why the timegrapher would show such a large difference from the visual check?

I notice quoting your original question that you have a timegrapher which one? Then can we have pictures really helpful for making diagnostics?

Then in comparison with a "1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch " Versus a modern wristwatch you're going to notice differences. Like for instance the lift angle it's probably not 52° that's going to change or amplitude on the Timing machine a little bit. Plus your Watch is 125 years old a lot of people of touched it between when it left the factory and now a lot of very creative people lots of strange things have occurred. It also be nice to have a picture of the balance wheel looking straight down there's things we need to look at their in addition to the timing machine results.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
    • Why cut the paper, cut a square around the image and grind to it. 
    • I did try that last time Rich , i traced the image from the Bestfit book which is the actual size. But its more difficut to cut the shape from paper than it is to grind the steel to shape. This way is pretty easy and the final shaping is done when fitting the part. There are a couple of things i will do differently next time, clamping the 2 pieces together with a drill press will help to hold while scribing the shape in. This was a bit tricky having only one hole, if using the pins and cork the drill size needs to match the pin diameter so there is no movement at all from the template. This movement hasn't finished frying me yet, damaged thread in the plate crown wheel hole and two rubbed in cracked jewels, thats gonna be much more fun.
×
×
  • Create New...