Jump to content

Replacing pallet arbor.


SparkyLB

Recommended Posts

This is my first endeavor after successfully disassembling, cleaning and lubricating, and putting back together a swiss movement.  No date or complications, just a center seconds hand.  I did not note the movement number underneath the balance.  It was a manual-wind orphaned movement. 

On my second movement, an orphaned one picked up on eBay for practice, I made a beginner mistake and tightened the pallet bridge onto a pivot that was not in the jewel hole.  I've broken the top pivot.  I have about 6 other orphaned movements bought "for parts" and I've used a staking set to remove the damaged arbor, and took a pallet arbor from a different pallet with nearly the same dimensions.  I am having one devil of a time completing this task putting a replacement arbor into the now arbor-less pallet.   

I've been at it for days, and taking a lot more time thinking than working.  So far I've isolated the "new" pallet arbor between two stakes in my staking set, with a flat, holed stake on bottom, and a rounded holed stake above.  If there's any part of a mechanical watch movement that's smaller than a pallet arbor, I don't know what it is! 

I'm unsure on how to proceed.  I thought I might surround the bottom portion into the stake with Rodico to stabilize it as I attempt to place the pallet.  This is certainly a challenge in manual dexterity for me. 

My plans are after the pallet is slid onto the new arbor, to tap a few times with the rounded stake in the hopes it peens the arbor just enough to fill to create a friction fit.  Short of that, I might use a slightly oversized flat holed stake from the top, and peen the pallet onto the arbor to the same effect. 

Those who might have performed this task, is there a certain set of steps, or advice for a beginner such as myself? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi In todays world fitting an arbor to a pallet is rare usually a new pallet/fork is obtained via the make and calibre of the watch (the mark and number under the balance) and this is fitted as a replacement. Using a near enough staff and trying to fit that is only going to lead to problems regarding end shake and a non functioning watch. As mentioned by Watchtime some pictures of the movment front and back and the calibre and make of the watch are essential if you are requiring further assistance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SparkyLB said:

If there's any part of a mechanical watch movement that's smaller than a pallet arbor, I don't know what it is!

An hairspring stud pin, as used on some cheap mov't is way smaller. 

Quote

Those who might have performed this task, is there a certain set of steps, or advice for a beginner such as myself? 

The advice given above is the right one, get a complete fork replacement. I think you are skipping steps for a beginner, get first to the point where you can comfortably service a regular mov't without breaking or loosing anything, and enjoy the pleasure of having it run perfectly. You will have plenty of time and better skills for more demanding repairs. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all.  I will heed the advice and pick up a new, complete pallet fork.  It's somewhat reassuring to hear from those more experienced that I'm "skipping steps."  I was hoping for that kind of response rather than one that suggests that this is an easy task. 

It's an FHF 96N calibre.

 

And yes, the hairspring stud pin escaped me.  That is far smaller! 

 

Thank you all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I usually don't read new introductions but when you came to the group did you want to learn watch repair? The reason I ask is your watch seems so suffered some damage under your hands. And now you're ready to move on to a new patient and have you learned? I often relate watch repair like learning to be a doctor lots of practicing. Even though this is a damaged watch have you practice taking it apart and putting it together a whole bunch at times so you feel confident that the next watch you probably won't break anything? Then when watches were invented specifically pallet forks they didn't have epoxy glue which even if they did they wouldn't you used anyway because the pallet stones need to be moved around they need to be adjusted. so the substance of choice for holding pallet stones and roller jewel's in is shellac. It's a really interesting substance were if it's warmed up at melts the palace on can be moved around hopefully the correct position when it cools shellac hardens back up in the pallet stone will be held in place. If you're carefully could probably put your pallet stone back just warm up the fork carefully ideally there's a tool for this and your pallet stone would be fine.
    • Hi @JohnR725, I would say its a happy end, the watch was in a much worser state and turned out quite nice(imho). I just hoped for a higher result after all that work.  I agree with you, as long as it runs and keeps time, Im happy. Thank you for your advices!   
    • The full article on that patent is a really interesting odd read. I wasn't aware that even a specific set of instructions on the use of a product could be patented. Does that mean that if i can prove that walking backwards will reduce shoe wear by up to 30% then i can patent that idea, and sue in court anyone i catch doing it ?
    • The wheels turned fine. I set the escape wheel in the epoxy when it had just ‘skinned’ and wasn’t set, made sure it spun with the 4th wheel, and let it set.    After cleaning I assembled the barrel and wheel train - all fine. Moving the barrel the escape wheel spun freely. I put a bit of 9010 in my epoxy setting.    It went wrong when I put the pallet fork in. It wasn’t seated right (no jewels) and the escape wheel  knocked a pallet jewel out. I have no idea how to reset a pallet jewel - epoxy again? I’m not spending any more time on this one - it’s missing hands and the front half of the case anyway, and I have more watches ready to put on the bench. 
    • No John, we don't want Mark to change anything, we are just scared of losing a brilliant forum and losing contact with each other.  As pointed out, this forum is full of knowledge and I for one,  consider the regulars friends. I would hate to lose contact with you and the others.   PS, this forum is really important to me. 
×
×
  • Create New...