Jump to content

Top & bottom Incabloc chaton size also different?


paul0

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm one of the people who made the mistake of mixing up top & bottom endstones. I read in this forum that generally, they are different sizes. Thankfully I did not break the Incabloc springs. 

But I'm curious, what are your experience chatons? Are also different size for top & bottom, or are they usually the same?

systeme_incabloc_small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually the same, rarely of diferent radius size. I have several ST96 movements of both types, I guess of diferent variants. Jewel thicknesses;  unknown.

I do switch top/ bottom jewels or replace one or both, even move the bottom jewel housing, for the purpose of staff's axial adjustment.

Further, have ground( on fine sandpaper) the endstones flat surface to repair/ reduce the thickness.

Moving the jewel housing beats shimming/gouging. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chatons  - some are different, some are not. When cleaning I keep the Balance jewels with the balance and mainplate jewels with the mainplate to avoid mixing them up.

There may be a case where the jewels or chatons have been swapped around, in such cases one cap-jewel will sit loose when the inca spring is 'locked'. This is where you have to sit back and figure out if the parts were swapped around or a part from another watch was used.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, anilv said:

Chatons  - some are different, some are not. When cleaning I keep the Balance jewels with the balance and mainplate jewels with the mainplate to avoid mixing them up.

There may be a case where the jewels or chatons have been swapped around, in such cases one cap-jewel will sit loose when the inca spring is 'locked'. This is where you have to sit back and figure out if the parts were swapped around or a part from another watch was used.

Anilv

Hi Anvil, How would you compensate for general pivot wear or changes introduced like new staff, fork?

I adjust shock springs tension as well, flip the spring over.   Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally a well serviced watch will have negligible wear at the balance pivots. If its worn you have to change.

You can get away with changing the depth of the mainplate jewel to address slightly worn pivots but this can cause other problems like harispring touching the balance cock or balance, the rolller jewel not making proper contact with the pallet fork. Also a worn pivot will usually mark the cap jewel as well as wearing the edges of the pivot (not only the tip) so anything other than replacing a balance staff will be a bodge.

Having said that in my neck of the woods (Malaysia) changing a balance staff and service will set you back USD70-100 (unless a balance can be harvested from another movement) so its not really an option for a USD50 watch. I have guys come in with their fathers watch which they want to keep running for occasional use so its not surprising that they opt for a bodge. As it will see minimal use I usually oblige by cleaning the pivots up and try to get the endshake in spec.

Anilv

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, anilv said:

Generally a well serviced watch will have negligible wear at the balance pivots. If its worn you have to change.

You can get away with changing the depth of the mainplate jewel to address slightly worn pivots but this can cause other problems like harispring touching the balance cock or balance, the rolller jewel not making proper contact with the pallet fork. Also a worn pivot will usually mark the cap jewel as well as wearing the edges of the pivot (not only the tip) so anything other than replacing a balance staff will be a bodge.

Having said that in my neck of the woods (Malaysia) changing a balance staff and service will set you back USD70-100 (unless a balance can be harvested from another movement) so its not really an option for a USD50 watch. I have guys come in with their fathers watch which they want to keep running for occasional use so its not surprising that they opt for a bodge. As it will see minimal use I usually oblige by cleaning the pivots up and try to get the endshake in spec.

Anilv

By adjusting the staff I mean correcting for any and all problems you mentioned above, like incorrect  pallet- escape teeth contact etc.We don,t always start with a movement in need of just general service but sometimes to repair the cause of the above mentioned especially if parts are unavailable.

Regards

and I havn,t forgotten my promise to suggestion you made two years ago. I will show off my vintage collection in proper section. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To do it properly, a worn pivot/parts should be replaced and brought back to spec, with skill and the right tools anything can be re-built but to do it economically is not possible. Hence the bodges exist.

In the example I gave above.. I didn't even bother to put it on a timegrapher.. as long as it ran ok on my wrist for a few days without losing much time and didn't stop when I put it on my bedside table it was good enough.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...